12.07.2015 Views

SHLAA Discarded Sites (March 2013) in PDF format - Allerdale ...

SHLAA Discarded Sites (March 2013) in PDF format - Allerdale ...

SHLAA Discarded Sites (March 2013) in PDF format - Allerdale ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SHLAA</strong> Location Settlement Site Site CommentsRefArea CapacityEXRU192 Land at Abbey Terrace Abbeytown 0.04 1 Less than 0.3haEXRU44 Land off Abbey Road Abbeytown 0.24 8 Less than 0.3haAARU123 Land at Manildra Abbeytown 0.25 8 Less than 0.3haAARU62 Land north of MillGroveAbbeytown 0.57 19 <strong>Discarded</strong> due to archaeological constra<strong>in</strong>ts(Scheduled Ancient Monument and Grade 1Listed Build<strong>in</strong>g)AARU60 Land adjacent to theGlebeAbbeytown 0.59 20 Access to site would need to <strong>in</strong>corporateexist<strong>in</strong>g access to garages belong<strong>in</strong>g to GlebeAARU58 Land adjacent to Croft Abbeytown 0.61 20 Unable to ascerta<strong>in</strong> ownership of siteHouseRU42 Land to the rear of Allonby 2.26 85 Lies with<strong>in</strong> Flood Zone 2/3Dick<strong>in</strong>son Place FarmEXRU61 Land at GriggsfieldFarmAllonby 2.39 90 Site considered too detached from settlement.Wedge to the south (Rear of Sea Gleam-Christmas Cottage) more appropriateRU41 Land off B5300(b) Allonby 2.9 109 Detached from ma<strong>in</strong> settlement. No suitableRU40 Land off B5300(a) Allonby 3.4 136 Detached from ma<strong>in</strong> settlement. No suitableEXRU100 Land to the rear of Brigham 0.07 2 Less than 0.3haAARU08 Lawsons Garth Brigham 0.19 6 Site has plann<strong>in</strong>g permissionEXRU188 Land at Barrs Lane Brigham 0.24 8 Means of access to the site consideredsubstandard to support residentialdevelopment. Less than 0.3haEXRU142 Land at Brigham Brigham 0.27 9 Less than 0.3ha. Could be developed <strong>in</strong>EXRU79 Croft Hill Farm Brigham 0.51 17 Means of access to the site consideredsubstandard to support residentialdevelopmentEXRU207 Croft Farm Brigham 0.53 18 Means of access to the site consideredsubstandard to support residentialdevelopmentBrigham 1.53 54 Access considered substandard. Owneradvised to consult highways. Only front arearealistic proposition for developmentEXRU198 Land off Ellerbeck Brow Brigham 1.64 58 Would have adverse visual impact - site poorlyEXRU135 Land to the rear of HighRiggEXRU206 Land at The Hill Brigham 2.18 82 <strong>Discarded</strong> as development of majority of sitewould have adverse landscape/visual impact.Development of area adjacent to 'The Hill'more realistic propositionEXRU95 Land off Hotchberry Rd Brigham 2.9 109 Substandard access due to restricted visibility.EXRU33 Kirk Cross Quarry, Brigham 3.14 126 Site has plann<strong>in</strong>g permissionBrighamEXRU191 Old Quarry Brigham 6.8 272 Site has significant biodiversity potential.Exist<strong>in</strong>g employment uses raise potentialamenity issues.EXRU129 Land adj P<strong>in</strong>e Tree Broughton 0.05 2 Site has plann<strong>in</strong>g permissionEXRU200 Land at Thorndene Broughton 0.16 5 Less than 0.3haRU16 Bryleen Broughton 0.24 8 Less than 0.3haEXRU184 Land at Pear Tree Broughton 0.25 8 Less than 0.3haEXRU112 Land at Coldgill Avenue Broughton 0.34 11 Part of site has permission, rema<strong>in</strong>der under0.3haEXRU36 Land at Craggs Road,BroughtonBroughton 1.3 46 Doubtful whether suitable standard accesscould be achieved. Development of site wouldhave adverse visual/landscape impact.EXRU212 Land adj Church Broughton 1.68 59 Site has plann<strong>in</strong>g permission

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!