01.12.2012 Views

Parents' Experiences of the Process of Choosing a Secondary School

Parents' Experiences of the Process of Choosing a Secondary School

Parents' Experiences of the Process of Choosing a Secondary School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

over parents who live within <strong>the</strong> catchment area but have not formally expressed a<br />

preference for that school.<br />

2.5 The Code <strong>of</strong> Practice points out that <strong>the</strong>re is some discretion over how places are<br />

allocated when parents are asked to express more than one preference and a school<br />

is oversubscribed. Priority can be given to <strong>the</strong> parents’ order <strong>of</strong> ranking but this is<br />

not a statutory requirement. How this is interpreted by different LEAs is <strong>the</strong> source<br />

<strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variation in practice that exists concerning admissions.<br />

2.6 Where a parent has been asked or chooses to express more than one preference for a<br />

secondary school, how those preferences are used by admission authorities to<br />

allocate school places is <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> differing opinions. In general terms this<br />

concerns whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> preferences a parent expresses should be considered in a rank<br />

order or treated as if <strong>the</strong>y are equal. The implications <strong>of</strong> this can be very important<br />

for parents. If preferences are dealt with in <strong>the</strong> strict order <strong>of</strong> priority as expressed<br />

by parents it may mean that a parent who is unsuccessful in obtaining a place at<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir first preference school is unable to obtain a place at <strong>the</strong>ir second preference<br />

school even if <strong>the</strong> school is nearby where <strong>the</strong> parent lives. Some LEAs avoid this<br />

problem by ensuring that if a parent does not obtain a place at <strong>the</strong>ir first preference<br />

school, a place is available at <strong>the</strong> local school as long as <strong>the</strong>y have put it as <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

second choice (see 4.1 below).<br />

2.7 Those LEAs where preferences are regarded as if <strong>the</strong>y are equal are able to manage<br />

<strong>the</strong> system more easily and co-ordinate <strong>of</strong>fers <strong>of</strong> school places. They can ensure<br />

that <strong>of</strong>fers are made at <strong>the</strong> same time to all parents. With <strong>the</strong>se kinds <strong>of</strong> arrangement<br />

LEAs are also able to take into account <strong>the</strong> travel consequences for parents and<br />

travel costs for <strong>the</strong> LEA when allocating places. However, this can mean that,<br />

where <strong>the</strong> LEAs have asked parents to rank <strong>the</strong>ir preferences in order <strong>the</strong>y do not<br />

invariably give a parent who has named a school first preference priority over<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r parent who has named it second or lower.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!