Unexpected Property and Auto upgrades can really add up.So can the discounts from Waterloo Insurance TM .Did you really wanta new paint job?Group Property and Auto Insuranceprotects you from unwanted upgrades.cont’d from page 5uncoordinated and disconnected from the larger whole. This leadsto fragmented, inconsistent and unreliable service out<strong>com</strong>es forcustomers. <strong>The</strong> prevailing opinion is that de-regulation has beena failure in Canada because it does not recognize the uniquenessof the country - its geography, vastness, sparse population,spread-out population centres. Deregulation is designed to encourage/attractmore <strong>com</strong>petition. Canada, unlike the U.S., doesnot have multiple entrants in the rail sector. <strong>The</strong> most significantobservations by our members relate to service erosion – includingbut certainly not limited to ever-increasing transit times, unreliableservice due to delays and congestion, capacity problems due toserious shortages of rolling stock and exorbitant fees for storage,extra drayage and much more.Another significant observation by our members relatesto performance standards. Notwithstanding these identifiedcritical service failures, systematic, national performanceis almost impossible to evaluate becausethere are currently no key performance measures(KPI’s). <strong>The</strong>re are no <strong>com</strong>prehensive standards, serviceexpectations, tracking or monitoring. <strong>The</strong>re is no systemin place with which to hold all players to account. Becauseof the lack of an integrated information systemacross the supply chain, the railways are slow to respondto sudden changes in demand. <strong>The</strong>y take severalweeks to adjust staffing levels and get equipment outof storage and in-service again. This results in less thanreliable services and volatile prices. <strong>The</strong>re is no oversightor national policy that governs performanceacross all of the functional entities i.e. between port andrail, steamship line and rail.6www.cgbgroup.<strong>com</strong>Call today and save up to 60% on your propertyand auto insurance premiums.Ontario: 905-752-8717 or 1-866-872-8717Quebec: 1-888-542-4811All Other Provinces: 1-866-247-7700Visit our website at: www.WaterlooInsurance.<strong>com</strong>Performance standards are a critical tool to help coherent functioningof the intermodal system. <strong>The</strong>y help establish expectationsand put in place a framework for collective performance and cooperation.<strong>The</strong> monopoly/duopoly – the lack of <strong>com</strong>petition – isvery problematic. Market dominance has led to a lack of focus onor <strong>com</strong>mitment to Canadian customer service by rail providers.Service decisions are often made without analysis of system-wideimplications. Historically, there has been a lack of consultation byrailways before change is introduced and lack of measurement ordata sharing after change is implemented...e.g. changes that impactimport or export supply chains such as those to free time allowedand increased storage fees.Re<strong>com</strong>mendationsIn our submission, <strong>CIFFA</strong> re<strong>com</strong>mended that the government moveas quickly as possible to address the market dominance issue relatedto the railways. Three strategies seem apparent for consideration.One, the government could endeavour to attract massiveamounts of new <strong>com</strong>petition, but this is most likely not realistic,timely or affordable given the level of investment required.A second option would be for the government to regulate <strong>com</strong>petitionand force the railways to open their infrastructure to <strong>com</strong>petitionand for the government actively to work to attract<strong>com</strong>petitors to this essential service (of particular importance toAtlantic Canada.).<strong>The</strong> <strong>Forwarder</strong> April 2010
<strong>The</strong> preferred, third option re<strong>com</strong>mended bymany <strong>CIFFA</strong> members is re-regulation of therailways through an oversight body, establishednational performance guidelines/standardsand a tracking process to monitor<strong>com</strong>pliance/performance. To build consistency,reliability and accountability into thesystem, key performance measures (KPI’s)should be established that are measurableand created through consultation. Suggestedareas are: transit times, rolling stock availability,dwell times, storage days, and investmentin infrastructure.trucks, rails, ships, ports, terminals – currentlythere is no integration. This creates duplication,added costs, inefficiencies, information errors.Re<strong>com</strong>mendations<strong>CIFFA</strong> re<strong>com</strong>mended that Transport Canadamandate the establishment of a single informationand tracking system to be used by allparticipants to improve coordination and efficiency.<strong>The</strong> system could be run by a thirdparty – non-railway, with Transport Canadaoversight to facilitate development and bringall the parties together. Investment, inclusionture in Canada: aging, unreliable equipmentthat breaks repeatedly (cranes, lo<strong>com</strong>otives,rolling stock wheels); a lack of equipment includingnot enough rolling stock, cranes,technology, information systems, knowledgeablestaff; a poor maintenance trackrecord; lack of investment in informationtechnology and the talent to manage it; badforecasting and contingency management; awillingness to hold cargo until there is returnrail car load. Canada’s <strong>com</strong>mitment to theAsia Pacific Gateway and Corridor is an admirablestart, but the grain-growing Prairiesand Ontario/Quebec manufacturing heart ofthe country are starved for investment.Re<strong>com</strong>mendationsUnfair and predatory practices should be curtailedand railways should be held accountablefor delays. A public mediation and<strong>com</strong>plaint system should be implementedand the need for out of gauge rail serviceshould be addressed in a public policy frameworkthat mandates rail lines to providequotes and carry over-sized freight instead offorcing it onto the roads. <strong>The</strong> governmentshould also seriously consider declaring therail lines an essential service given their importanceto our sovereignty and nationaleconomy.Integrated Rail System<strong>The</strong> second major issue observed is the lackof an integrated tracking/reservation system.Tracking and expediting containers efficientlythrough the system is a major problem for exportersand importers. <strong>The</strong> system is recognizedinternationally as inconsistent, unreliableand lacking capacity. <strong>The</strong>re is almost a <strong>com</strong>pletelack of <strong>com</strong>munications between variousparts of the supply chain. Each part of the industryhas its own information system –and <strong>com</strong>mitment of all stakeholders in the intermodalchain including freight forwarderswould be essential. <strong>The</strong> system could alsofunction as a monitoring system that accumulatesaggregate performance data criticalto the measurement of efficiency of the intermodalsupply chain. If this re<strong>com</strong>mendationis implemented it would measurably reduceconfusion, delays, lost cargo, unnecessarydwell times, drayage and costs etc.Rail Infrastructure<strong>The</strong> third issue focused on by Members wasthat the rail carriers are not investing adequatelyin improving the aging intermodal infrastructurein this country. Compared to thebillions of dollars being spent in the U.S.,China and Europe, Canada is falling behindand is be<strong>com</strong>ing less <strong>com</strong>petitive internationally.Railways do not have enough equipmentto service the Canadian market andwhat equipment is available is not well managedfrom an inventory control point of view.Members cite a number of proofs of the unwillingnessto invest in intermodal infrastruc-<strong>CIFFA</strong> re<strong>com</strong>mended that given its vital importanceto the economic health and futureof Canada, the Canadian government mustre-regulate the rail lines to ensure that appropriatecapital investments are being madewithin Canada and designed to benefitCanadians. Action by the government mustgo beyond capital cost allowances to actuallymandate a percentage annual spend level oninfrastructure investment within Canada byrail lines. Recognizing the need for fundingto make up for decades of insufficient investmentit is re<strong>com</strong>mended that a dedicated railinfrastructure fund be created, supported bycross industry-sector stakeholders and government.Given that railways are abandoningshort rail spurs, the federal governmentshould give due consideration to investmentin short lines.Canada is a trading nation. If we wish to<strong>com</strong>pete as global traders in a <strong>com</strong>petitivemarketplace, if we wish to attract foreigninvestment and trade, if we wish to continueto drive Canada’s economic growthand the well-being of its citizens, the governmentof Canada must take action nowto ensure a rail freight service that servesthe national interest.<strong>The</strong> full paper is available atwww.ciffa.<strong>com</strong> underAdvocacy/Rail-Intermodal.Members are encouraged tosend their thoughts on ourreport to Ruth Snowden,Executive Director.ruths@ciffa.<strong>com</strong>.7<strong>The</strong> <strong>Forwarder</strong> April 2010