01.12.2012 Views

Hydrometallurgical process for extraction of metals...

Hydrometallurgical process for extraction of metals...

Hydrometallurgical process for extraction of metals...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Association <strong>of</strong> Metallurgical Engineers <strong>of</strong> Serbia<br />

AMES<br />

Scientific paper<br />

UDC: 661.061.34:628.4.043<br />

HYDROMETALLURGICAL PROCESS FOR EXTRACTION OF<br />

METALS FROM ELECTRONIC WASTE-PART I: MATERIAL<br />

CHARACTERIZATION AND PROCESS OPTION SELECTION<br />

Željko Kamberović * , Marija Korać, Dragana Ivšić, Vesna Nikolić,<br />

Milisav Ranitović<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Technology and<br />

Metallurgy, Belgrade, Serbia<br />

Received 11.11.2009<br />

Accepted 28.12.2009.<br />

Abstract<br />

Used electronic equipment became one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing waste streams in<br />

the world. In the past two decades recycling <strong>of</strong> printed circuit boards (PCBs) has been<br />

based on pyrometallurgy, higly polluting recycling technology whic causes a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental problems. The most <strong>of</strong> the contemporary research activities on recovery<br />

<strong>of</strong> base and precious <strong>metals</strong> from waste PCBs are focused on hydrometallurgical<br />

techniques as more exact, predictable and easily controlled. In this paper mechanically<br />

pretrated PCBs are leached with nitric acid. Pouring density, percentage <strong>of</strong> magnetic<br />

fraction, particle size distribution, metal content and leachability are determined using<br />

optical microscopy, atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), X-ray fluorescent<br />

spectrometry (XRF) and volumetric analysis. Three hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong> options<br />

<strong>for</strong> recycling <strong>of</strong> copper and precious <strong>metals</strong> from waste PCBs are proposed and<br />

optimized: the use <strong>of</strong> selective leachants <strong>for</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> high purity <strong>metals</strong> (fluoroboric<br />

acid, ammonia-ammonium salt solution), conventional leachants (sulphuric acid,<br />

chloride, cyanide) and eco-friendly leachants (<strong>for</strong>mic acid, potassium persulphate).<br />

Results presented in this paper showed that size reduction <strong>process</strong> should include<br />

cutting instead <strong>of</strong> hammer shredding <strong>for</strong> obtaining suitable shape & granulation and that<br />

<strong>for</strong> further testing usage <strong>of</strong> particle size -3 +0.1mm is recommended. Also, Fe magnetic<br />

phase content could be reduced be<strong>for</strong>e hydro treatment.<br />

Key words: electronic waste, printed circuit boards, recycling, hydrometallurgy,<br />

copper, precious <strong>metals</strong><br />

* Corresponding author: Željko Kamberović kamber@tmf.bg.ac.rs


232 MJoM Vol 15 (4) 2009 p.231-243<br />

Introduction<br />

Fast electronic industry development brought the great benefits in everyday life,<br />

but its consequences are usually ignored or even unknown. Used electronic equipment<br />

became one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing waste streams in the world. From 20 to 50 million<br />

tonnes <strong>of</strong> waste electical and electronic equipment (WEEE, e-waste) are generated each<br />

year, bringing significant risks to human health and the environment [1]. EU legislative<br />

restricts the use <strong>of</strong> hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE)<br />

(Directive 2002/95/EC) such as: lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium and flame<br />

retardants: polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) or polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE)<br />

and also promotes the collection and recycling <strong>of</strong> such equipment (Directive<br />

2002/96/EC). They have been in implementation since February 2003. Despite rules on<br />

collection and recycling only one third <strong>of</strong> electrical and electronic waste in the<br />

European Union is reported as appropriately treated and the other two thirds are sent to<br />

landfills and potentially to sub-standard treatment sites in or outside the European<br />

Union. In December 2008 the European Commission proposed to revise the directives<br />

on EEE in order to tackle the fast increasing waste stream <strong>of</strong> these products [2].<br />

Recycling <strong>of</strong> printed circuit boards (PCBs), as a key component in the WEEE, in<br />

past two decades have been based on recovery via material smelting. This is highly<br />

polluting, primitive recycling technology that can cause a variety <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

problems. It is mostly <strong>process</strong>ed, sometimes illegally, in developing countries, <strong>for</strong><br />

instance China, India, Pakistan and some African countries [3,4]. Goosey and Kellner in<br />

their detailed study [5] have defined the existing and potential technologies that might<br />

be used <strong>for</strong> the recycling <strong>of</strong> PCBs. They pointed out that <strong>metals</strong> could be recycled by<br />

mechanical <strong>process</strong>ing, pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, biohydrometallurgy or a<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> these techniques.<br />

Pyrometallurgy, as traditional method to recover precious and non-ferrous <strong>metals</strong><br />

from e-waste, includes different treatments on high temperatures: incineration, melting<br />

etc. Pyrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>es could not be considered as best available recycling<br />

techniques anymore because some <strong>of</strong> the PCB componenets, especially plastics and<br />

flame retardants, produce toxic and carcinogenic compounds. The most <strong>of</strong> the research<br />

activities on recovery <strong>of</strong> base and precious <strong>metals</strong> from waste PCBs are focused on<br />

hydrometallurgical techniques <strong>for</strong> they are more exact, predictable and easily controlled<br />

[6,7].<br />

In recent years the great number <strong>of</strong> investigations have been conducted in order<br />

to solve the problem <strong>of</strong> WEEE and develop appropriate recycling techniques. According<br />

to Cui and Zhang [7] recycling <strong>of</strong> e-waste can be broadly divided into three major steps:<br />

a) disassembly-mechanical pretreatment: selectively removing hazardous and valuble<br />

components <strong>for</strong> special treatment and it is necessary step <strong>for</strong> further operations, b)<br />

concentrating: increasing the concentration <strong>of</strong> desirable materials using mechanical<br />

and/or metallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing and c) refining: metallurgical treatment and purification<br />

<strong>of</strong> desirable materials.<br />

Hydrometallurgu, i.e. leaching and cementation <strong>process</strong> in Serbian mine Bor was<br />

first mentioned in 1907 when 200 tons <strong>of</strong> copper were produced. Since those days till<br />

today copper hydrometallurgy has not mount at Serbia and nearby region [8].<br />

<strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong>ing consist <strong>of</strong>: leaching – transfering desirable<br />

components into solution using acides or halides as leaching agents, purification <strong>of</strong> the


Kamberović et al- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>... 233<br />

leach solution to remove impurities by solvent <strong>extraction</strong>, adsorption or ion-exchange,<br />

then recovery <strong>of</strong> base and precious <strong>metals</strong> from the solution by electrorefining <strong>process</strong>,<br />

chemical reduction, or crystallization. The most efficient leaching agents are acids, due<br />

to their ability to leach both base and precious <strong>metals</strong>. Generally, base <strong>metals</strong> are<br />

leached in nitric acid [9, 10]. The most efficient agent used <strong>for</strong> solder leach is<br />

fluoroboric acid [11]. Copper is leached by sulphuric acid or aqua regia [12]. Aqua regia<br />

is also used <strong>for</strong> gold and silver [11], but these <strong>metals</strong> are usually leached by thiourea or<br />

cyanide [13]. Palladium is leached by hydrochloric acid and sodium chlorate [7].<br />

Biohydrometallurgy is a new, cleaner and one <strong>of</strong> the most promising ec<strong>of</strong>riendly<br />

technologies. Biosorption is a <strong>process</strong> employing a suitable biomass to sorb<br />

heavy <strong>metals</strong> from aqueous solutions [14]. This is physico-chemical mechanism based<br />

on ion-exchange [15], metal ion surface complexation adsorption or both [16].<br />

Oishi et al. [17] conducted research on recovery <strong>of</strong> copper from PCBs by<br />

hydrometallurgical techniques. Proposed <strong>process</strong> consists <strong>of</strong> leaching, solvent <strong>extraction</strong><br />

and electrowinning. In the first stage <strong>of</strong> research conducted by Veit et al. [12]<br />

mechanical <strong>process</strong>ing was used as comminution followed by size, magnetic and<br />

electrostatic separation. After pretreatment, the fraction with concentrated Cu, Pb and<br />

Sn was dissolved with acids and treated in an electrochemical <strong>process</strong> in order to<br />

recover the <strong>metals</strong> separately, especially copper, with two different solutions: aqua regia<br />

and sulphuric acid. Frey and Park [11] per<strong>for</strong>med research <strong>for</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> high purity<br />

precious <strong>metals</strong> from PCBs using aqua regia as a leachant. The most significant<br />

achievement <strong>of</strong> this research was synthesis <strong>of</strong> pure gold nanoparticles.<br />

Sheng and Etsell [9] investigated leaching <strong>of</strong> gold from computer chips. The first<br />

stage was leaching <strong>of</strong> base <strong>metals</strong> with nitric acid and the second, leaching <strong>of</strong> gold with<br />

aqua regia due to its flexibility, ease and low capital requirement. Non-metallic<br />

materials are also recovered this way, mainly plastic and ceramics. Quinet et al. [18]<br />

carried out bench-scale <strong>extraction</strong> study on the applicability <strong>of</strong> economically feasible<br />

hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing routes to recover silver, gold and palladium from waste<br />

mobile phones. Selective <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> dissolved <strong>metals</strong> from solution is very difficult<br />

and demanding <strong>process</strong> [19].<br />

Experimental<br />

Electronic waste is defined as a mixture <strong>of</strong> various <strong>metals</strong>, particularly copper,<br />

aluminum and steel, attached to different types <strong>of</strong> plastics and ceramics.<br />

The samples <strong>for</strong> experimental research presented in this paper were milled PCBs<br />

with obtained by mechanical pretreatment <strong>of</strong> waste computers.<br />

The mechanical pretreatment <strong>of</strong> end-<strong>of</strong>-life computers was per<strong>for</strong>med at<br />

SETrade, Belgrade. The first stage was manual disassembling <strong>of</strong> computers, liberation<br />

<strong>of</strong> PCBs and removal <strong>of</strong> the batteries and capacitors. Liberated PCBs were milled in<br />

QZ-decomposer, separating magnetic materials from non magnetic fractions, while<br />

aluminum was manually removed from conveyor belt. Material was then milled in<br />

shredder Meccano Plastica, after which material was not exposed to another magnetic<br />

separation.<br />

Characterization <strong>of</strong> granulated waste PCBs included determination <strong>of</strong> following<br />

parameters: pouring density, percentage <strong>of</strong> magnetic fraction, particle size distribution,


234 MJoM Vol 15 (4) 2009 p.231-243<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> metal components leachability using optical microscopy, atomic absorption<br />

spectrometry (AAS), X-ray fluorescent spectrometry (XRF) and volumetric analysis.<br />

Also, appropriate hydrometallurgical system <strong>for</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> metal components and<br />

optimization <strong>of</strong> <strong>process</strong> parameters: temperature, time, solid:liquid ratio and mixing<br />

velocity are selected.<br />

Sieve analysis was per<strong>for</strong>med using Taylor type sieves and mass <strong>of</strong> fractions<br />

obtained after 30 minutes sieving was measured. Percentage <strong>of</strong> each fraction was<br />

calculateded.<br />

The pouring density <strong>of</strong> total sample and <strong>of</strong> each fraction was measured using<br />

Hall flowmeter funnel (ASTM B13). Pouring density <strong>of</strong> total sample was 889 kg/m 3 .<br />

The sample was subjected to the magnetic separation <strong>process</strong> using two<br />

permanent magnets each weighing 100g. Percentage <strong>of</strong> magnetic material content was<br />

5.39%.<br />

Content <strong>of</strong> metallic and non-metallic components <strong>of</strong> entire sample as well as <strong>for</strong><br />

each fraction was determined by leaching with 50 vol.% HNO3 near to boiling<br />

temperature with agitation followed by filtration after cooling. Metallic fraction is<br />

transferred to liquid. Solid non-metallic residue mass is measured after filtration.<br />

Experimental results are shown in Table 1.<br />

Table 1. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> PCBs granulated samples<br />

mm Fraction, ρ, kg/m<br />

wt.%<br />

3<br />

Metallic part,<br />

wt.%<br />

5.000 7.07 800 43.84<br />

2.500 37.24 880 50.44<br />

2.000 6.99 830.15 55.47<br />

1.800 8.50 986.33 38.86<br />

1.250 11.68 1235.63 31.57<br />

1.000 5.61 1474.61 48.48<br />

0.800 5.42 1136.59 61.25<br />

0.630 4.81 1022.48 43.95<br />

0.500 1.64 958.63 50.20<br />

0.400 2.75 908.81 44.26<br />

0.315 2.47 794.15 41.31<br />

0.250 1.16 656.74 37.87<br />

0.100 2.82 632.61 35.86<br />

-0.100 1.83 622.05 38.50<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the sieve analysis showed that the greatest percent <strong>of</strong> sample was in<br />

fraction +2.5mm. Metallic part was mostly contained in fraction +0.8 mm.<br />

Figures 1a-f are presenting some <strong>of</strong> the PCB fractions be<strong>for</strong>e and after dissolving<br />

in nitric acid and removal <strong>of</strong> metallic components.


Kamberović et al- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>... 235<br />

As received After dissolution<br />

a)<br />

c)<br />

e)<br />

Figure1. PCB fractions be<strong>for</strong>e and after dissolving in HNO3 a&b) 1.8mm; c&d)<br />

1.0mm; e&f) 0.1mm<br />

b)<br />

d)<br />

f)


236 MJoM Vol 15 (4) 2009 p.231-243<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> chemical composition <strong>of</strong> granulated PCBs was per<strong>for</strong>med using<br />

volumetric analysis, AAS and XRF spectrometry. Materials used <strong>for</strong> presented analysis<br />

were both granulated samples and samples after sieve analysis dissolved in 50 vol.%<br />

HNO3.<br />

Volumetric analysis was per<strong>for</strong>med using standard sodium tiosulphate solution<br />

<strong>for</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> samples dissolved in 50 vol.% HNO3. Results showed that copper<br />

content in granulated PCBs was 21.61 wt%. Also, distribution <strong>of</strong> copper in fractions<br />

was determined by volumetric analysis as presented in Table 2.<br />

Table 2. Distribution <strong>of</strong> copper in fractions<br />

fraction, mm Cu, wt.%<br />

5.000 21.96<br />

2.500 18.37<br />

2.000 21.81<br />

1.800 13.90<br />

1.250 17.82<br />

1.000 22.75<br />

0.800 26.34<br />

0.630 17.53<br />

0.500 24.26<br />

0.400 20.22<br />

0.315 15.08<br />

0.250 11.16<br />

0.100 11.45<br />

-0.100 11.47<br />

Presented results show that copper is mostly concentrated in fraction +0.8 mm.<br />

AAS was used <strong>for</strong> analyzing solutions <strong>of</strong> each fraction, obtained by dissolving in<br />

50 vol.% HNO3, in order to determine content <strong>of</strong> Cu, Zn, Fe, Ni, Pb. It was per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

by Perkin Elmer 4000 spectometer calibrated with standard solutions <strong>for</strong> each measured<br />

metal. Results <strong>of</strong> experimental analysis are shown in Table 3.


Kamberović et al- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>... 237<br />

Table 3. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> WPCBs each fraction in wt.%<br />

mm Cu Zn Ni Fe Pb<br />

5.000 11.06 1.89 1.79 5.99 0.89<br />

2.500 30.50 2.25 1.93 0.18 0.71<br />

2.000 30.24 2.28 1.21 2.28 1.53<br />

1.800 24.14 2.04 0.29 0.13 0.78<br />

1.250 35.31 1.73 1.07 1.20 3.85<br />

1.000 33.38 2.23 0.36 1.22 7.15<br />

0.800 27.62 2.21 0.61 0.51 5.91<br />

0.630 28.99 1.68 0.59 0.88 3.56<br />

0.500 40.42 1.81 0.61 1.45 3.44<br />

0.400 40.16 1.24 0.97 1.30 3.50<br />

0.315 23.17 1.27 0.61 1.68 3.76<br />

0.250 14.44 1.18 0.31 1.77 2.09<br />

0.100 7.87 1.31 0.20 2.36 1.50<br />

-0.100 6.32 2.89 0.58 5.22 2.12<br />

Fraction +5mm contained ~6% <strong>of</strong> Fe, which means that magnetic separation was<br />

not efficient enough <strong>for</strong> this size <strong>of</strong> particles.<br />

XRF spectrometry was used <strong>for</strong> direct analysis <strong>of</strong> granulated PCBs samples.<br />

Characteristic parts like contacts, solders and composites were analysed. XRF analysis<br />

was per<strong>for</strong>med on Skyray EDX 3000. Measurement spots labeled lom-1 to 4 are<br />

presented at Figure 2 and results in Table 4.<br />

Figure 2. Measurement spots <strong>for</strong> XRF analysis


238 MJoM Vol 15 (4) 2009 p.231-243<br />

Table 4. Results <strong>of</strong> XRF analysis<br />

Cu Ag Rh Pd Pt Au<br />

Lom 1 96.254 3.746<br />

Lom 2 95.072 4.928<br />

Lom 3 73.121 6.45 2.521 17.943<br />

Lom 3 30.749 14.762 8.806 2.353 43.33<br />

Lom 4 95.03 4.97<br />

XRF analysis showed that metal content varies from sample to sample and it<br />

highly depends on measuring spot.<br />

Based on detailed literature review and presented experimental results, several<br />

<strong>process</strong> option were selected as an appropriate hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> from electronic waste was.<br />

Process option 1-The use <strong>of</strong> selective leachants and recovery <strong>of</strong> high purity<br />

<strong>metals</strong> from PCBs<br />

This <strong>process</strong> option involves four main stages:<br />

1. mechanical pre treatment that includes shredding, magnetic separation,<br />

eddy current separation and classification [11],<br />

2. solder leach with fluoroboric acid and Ti(IV) ion as oxidizing agent<br />

[20],<br />

3. recovery <strong>of</strong> copper that includes leaching with ammonia-ammonium<br />

salt solution, purification by solvent <strong>extraction</strong> with organic LIX 26 and<br />

electrowinning [17]<br />

4. recovery <strong>of</strong> high purity precious <strong>metals</strong> (Au, Ag ang Pd) using aqua<br />

regia [11].<br />

Schematic preview <strong>of</strong> <strong>process</strong> option 1 is presented in Figure 3.


Kamberović et al- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>... 239<br />

Non metalic<br />

Electronic Scrap<br />

(General composition:<br />

Cu, Al, Fe, Sn, Pb, Zn, Ni, Ag, Au, Pd + non metallic<br />

Shredding<br />

Magnetic & Eddy<br />

Current separation<br />

Residue: about 90 wt.% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

(Cu, Sn, Pb, Zn, Ni, Ag, Au, Pd + non metallic<br />

24h, 25 C<br />

Solder leach<br />

(HBF4 )<br />

Residue: about18 % <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

(Cu, Zn, Ni, Ag, Au, Pd)<br />

Copper leach<br />

[Cu(II)/NH3/NH4 + ]<br />

Residue: about 2 wt.% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

(Zn, Ni, Ag, Au, Pd)<br />

Recovery <strong>of</strong> precious<br />

<strong>metals</strong><br />

Separation <strong>of</strong> nickel and<br />

zinc<br />

solution<br />

Iron/steel fraction<br />

aluminum fraction<br />

Solder recovery:<br />

electrowinning<br />

solder: 7 wt.% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

Sn: 4.2 wt.%<br />

Pb: 2.8 wt.%<br />

solution Copper recovery:<br />

electrowinning<br />

16% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

Leaching<br />

Solvent<br />

Extraction<br />

Electrowinning<br />

Figure 3. The recycling <strong>process</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> contained in PCB waste<br />

PCB: ground<br />

Solution:Cu(II)/NH3/NH4 +<br />

Duration: 24h, 25°C<br />

Process option 2- The use <strong>of</strong> conventional leachants <strong>for</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> from<br />

waste PCBs<br />

This <strong>process</strong> option represents bench-scale method <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> and recovery <strong>of</strong><br />

copper and precious <strong>metals</strong> from waste PCBs. After comminution, material was<br />

subjected to serial <strong>of</strong> hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing routes: sulphuric acid leaching and<br />

precipitation <strong>for</strong> Cu recovery; chloride leaching followed by cementation <strong>for</strong> Pd, Ag, Au<br />

and Cu recovery and cyanidation and activated carbon adsorption <strong>for</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> Au<br />

and Ag. The proposed flowsheet is presented in Figure 4.


240 MJoM Vol 15 (4) 2009 p.231-243<br />

Figure 4. Proposed flowsheet <strong>for</strong> the recovery <strong>of</strong> precious <strong>metals</strong> from WPCBs [18]<br />

Process option 3- The use <strong>of</strong> green leachants <strong>for</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> from waste<br />

PCBs<br />

This <strong>process</strong> option is particulary based on recovery <strong>of</strong> gold from electronic<br />

waste using an “eco-friendly” or “green” reagents. After communition, non-toxic<br />

reagents <strong>for</strong>mic acid and potassium persulphate are used <strong>for</strong> Au leaching at boiling<br />

temperature. Base <strong>metals</strong>, obtained as by-products, in a further steps could be recoverd<br />

by electrowining. Gold is recoverd by melting. This <strong>process</strong> option is presented in<br />

Figure 5.


Kamberović et al- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>... 241<br />

Fig. 5. Flow sheet <strong>of</strong> gold recovery from gold-plated PCBs (GPCB), gold-coated glass<br />

bangles (GCGB) and gold-coated mirrors (GCM)


242 MJoM Vol 15 (4) 2009 p.231-243<br />

Conclusion<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> experimental results it can be concluded that properties <strong>of</strong><br />

investigated material is in accordance with literature and it could be a representative <strong>for</strong><br />

selection <strong>of</strong> proper hydrometallurgical recycling technique. AAS chemical analysis has<br />

shown that fraction above 5 mm contained high amount <strong>of</strong> Fe and should be avoided by<br />

more efficient magnetic separation. Also, -0.1 mm fracton can cause various difficulties<br />

in <strong>process</strong>, great loses due to large content <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> in this fraction and decreased<br />

leachability.<br />

Final selection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>process</strong> which could be applied <strong>for</strong> further analysis<br />

depends on input materials characteristics. There is no completely green option.<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> suitable hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong> highly depend on leaching tests and<br />

techno-economical analysis and possible solution <strong>for</strong> electronic waste lies in<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> proposed <strong>process</strong> options.<br />

Literature<br />

[1] S. Herat, International regulations and treaties on electronic waste (e-waste),<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Environmental Engineering, 1 (4), 2009, 335 - 351<br />

[2] Recast <strong>of</strong> the WEEE and RoHS Directives proposed in 2008,<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/weee/index_en.htm<br />

[3] Basel Action Network and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, Exporting Harm:<br />

The High-Tech Trashing <strong>of</strong> Asia, Seattle and San Jose, 2002<br />

[4] Carroll, High-Tech Trash, National Geographic Magazine Online, 2002,<br />

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/2008-01/high-tech-trash/carrolltext.html<br />

[5] M. Goosey, R. Kellner, A Scoping study end-<strong>of</strong>-life printed circuit boards,<br />

Intellect and the Department <strong>of</strong> Trade and Industry, Makati City, 2002<br />

[6] J. C. Lee, H. T. Song, J. M. Yoo, Present status <strong>of</strong> the recycling <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

electrical and electronic equipment in Korea, Resources, Conservation and<br />

Recycling 50 (4), 2007, 380–397<br />

[7] J. Cui, L. Zhang, Metallurgical recovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> from electronic waste: A<br />

review, Journal <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Materials, 158 (2-3), 2008, 228–256<br />

[8] Ž. Kamberović, D. Sinadinović, M. Sokić, M. Korać, <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong><br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> refractory and polymetallic copper ores, V th Congress <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Metallurgists <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, 17-20 septembar, Ohrid, Makedonija, 2008, IL-02-E<br />

[9] P.P. Sheng, T.H. Etsell, Recovery <strong>of</strong> gold from computer circuit board scrap<br />

using aqua regia, Waste Management and Research, 25 (4), 2007, 380–383<br />

[10] R. Vračar, Vučković N., Kamberović Ž., Leaching <strong>of</strong> copper(I) sulphide by<br />

sulphuric acid solution with addition <strong>of</strong> sodium nitrate, Hydrometallurgy,<br />

Elsevier, vol 70/1-3 (2003) 143 - 151<br />

[11] Y. J. Park, D. Fray, Recovery <strong>of</strong> high purity precious <strong>metals</strong> from printed circuit<br />

boards, Journal <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Materials 164 (2-3), 2009, 1152 –1158<br />

[12] H. M. Veit, A. M. Bernardes, J. Z. Ferreira, J. A. Soares Tenório, C. de Fraga<br />

Malfatti, Recovery <strong>of</strong> copper from printed circuit boards scraps by mechanical


Kamberović et al- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>... 243<br />

<strong>process</strong>ing and electrometallurgy, Journal <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Materials, 137 (3), 2006,<br />

1704–1709<br />

[13] Ž. Kamberović, D. Sinadinović, M. Korać, Metallurgy <strong>of</strong> gold and silver (in<br />

Serbian), SIMS, 2007<br />

[14] K. Chojnacka, Biosorption and bioaccumulation – the prospects <strong>for</strong> practical<br />

applications, Environment International, 2009, Article in Press, Corrected Pro<strong>of</strong><br />

[15] G. Naja, V. Diniz, B. Volesky, Predicting metal biosorption per<strong>for</strong>mance, In:<br />

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the16th International Biohydrometallurgy Symposium, S. T. L.<br />

Harrison, D. E. Rawlings, J. Peterson, Eds., Compress Co.: Cape Town, South<br />

Africa, 2005, 553−562<br />

[16] B.C. Qi, C. Aldrich, Biosorption <strong>of</strong> heavy <strong>metals</strong> from aqueous solutions with<br />

tobacco dust, Bioresource Technology, 99 (13), 2008, 5595–5601<br />

[17] T. Oishi, K. Koyama, S. Alam, M. Tanaka, J. C. Lee, Recovery <strong>of</strong> high purity<br />

copper cathode from printed circuit boards using ammoniacal sulphate or<br />

chloride solutions, Hydrometallurgy 89 (1-2), 2007, 82–88<br />

[18] P. Quinet, J. Proost, A. Van Lierde, Recovery <strong>of</strong> precious <strong>metals</strong> from electronic<br />

scrap by hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing routes, Minerals and Metallurgical<br />

Processing, 22 (1), 2005, 17–22<br />

[19] J. Pavlović, S.Stopić, B.Friedrich, Ž. Kamberović, Selective Removal <strong>of</strong> Heavy<br />

Metals from Metal-bearing Wastewaters in Cascade Line Reactor,<br />

Environmental Science and Pollution Research-ESPR, 7, Vol.14, (2007), 518-<br />

522<br />

[20] Gibson at al. Patent US 6.641.712 B1, 2003, Process <strong>for</strong> the recovery <strong>of</strong> tin, tin<br />

alloys or lead alloys from printed circuit boards


Association <strong>of</strong> Metallurgical Engineers <strong>of</strong> Serbia<br />

AMES<br />

Scientific paper<br />

UDC: 628.477.6<br />

HYDROMETALLURGICAL PROCESS FOR EXTRACTION OF<br />

METALS FROM ELECTRONIC WASTE-PART II: DEVELOPMENT<br />

OF THE PROCESSES FOR THE RECOVERY OF COPPER FROM<br />

PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS (PCB)<br />

Željko Kamberović 1* , Marija Korać 2 , Milisav Ranitović 2<br />

1 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Technology and Metallurgy, University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Serbia<br />

2 Innovation center <strong>of</strong> the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Technology and Metallurgy, Belgrade,<br />

Serbia<br />

Received 13.06.2011<br />

Accepted 15.08.2011<br />

Abstract<br />

Rapid technological development induces increase <strong>of</strong> generation <strong>of</strong> used electric<br />

and electronic equipment waste, causing a serious threat to the environment. Waste<br />

printed circuit boards (WPCBs), as the main component <strong>of</strong> the waste, are significant<br />

source <strong>of</strong> base and precious <strong>metals</strong>, especially copper and gold. In recent years, most <strong>of</strong><br />

the activities on the recovery <strong>of</strong> base and precious <strong>metals</strong> from waste PCBs are focused<br />

on hydrometallurgical techniques as more exact, predictable and easily controlled<br />

compared to conventional pyrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>es. In this research essential aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> the hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> waste <strong>of</strong> electronic and electrical equipment<br />

(WEEE) using sulfuric acid and thiourea leaching are presented. Based on the<br />

developed flow-sheet, both economic feasibility and return on investment <strong>for</strong> obtained<br />

<strong>process</strong>ing conditions were analyzed. Furthermore, according to this analysis, SuperPro<br />

Designer s<strong>of</strong>tware was used to develop a preliminary techno-economical assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

presented hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>, suggested <strong>for</strong> application in small mobile plant<br />

addressed to small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Following <strong>of</strong> this paper, the<br />

described <strong>process</strong> is techno-economically feasible <strong>for</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> gold exceeding the<br />

limit value <strong>of</strong> 500ppm. Payback time is expected in time period from up to 7 years,<br />

depending on two deferent amounts <strong>of</strong> input waste material, 50kg and 100kg <strong>of</strong> WEEE<br />

per batch.<br />

Key words: waste printed circuit boards, recycling, hydrometallurgy, copper leaching,<br />

gold leaching, techno-economical assessment<br />

* Corresponding author: Željko Kamberović, kamber@tmf.bg.ac.rs


140 Metalurgija-MJoM Vol 17 (3) 2011 p. 139-149<br />

Introduction<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> rapid technical and technological development, waste electric and<br />

electronic equipment (WEEE) is becoming one <strong>of</strong> the major environmental risks <strong>for</strong> its<br />

high quantity and toxicity in recent years. In terms <strong>of</strong> materials and components WEEE<br />

is non-homogeneous and very complex, and the major challenge <strong>for</strong> recycling<br />

operations is how to respond to poor recovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> by mechanical treatment as well<br />

to avoid gas handling problems or hazard gas compounds release using<br />

pirometallurgical <strong>process</strong>. Printed circuit boards (PCBs), as a key component <strong>of</strong> WEEE,<br />

can be considered as a significant secondary raw material due to its complex<br />

composition, mainly consisted <strong>of</strong> plastic, glass, ceramics and <strong>metals</strong> (copper, aluminum,<br />

iron, zinc, nickel, lead and precious <strong>metals</strong>). In the past two decades much attention has<br />

been devoted to development <strong>of</strong> techniques <strong>for</strong> recycling WEEE, especially copper and<br />

precious <strong>metals</strong> [1, 2, 3]. The state <strong>of</strong> the art in recovery <strong>of</strong> precious <strong>metals</strong> from<br />

electronic waste highlights two major recycling techniques, such as pyrometallurgical<br />

and hydrometallurgical, both combined with mechanical pre-treatment.<br />

Pyrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing including incineration, smelting in a plasma arc furnace or<br />

blast furnace, sintering, melting and reactions in a gas phase at high temperatures has<br />

been a conventional technology <strong>for</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> from WEEE [4, 5, 6]. However,<br />

state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art smelters are highly depended on investments. In the last decade,<br />

attention has been moved from pyrometallurgical to hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

recovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> from electronic waste [7, 8].<br />

This paper describes essential aspects <strong>of</strong> the hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing <strong>of</strong><br />

WEEE using sulfuric acid and thiourea leaching. Previous studies, reported by authors<br />

[9, 10] were conducted in order to investigate optimal <strong>process</strong>ing conditions concerning<br />

hydrometallurgical recovery <strong>of</strong> base and precious <strong>metals</strong> from WPCBs. In this paper<br />

some results obtained in these studies are also presented. Based on these results,<br />

regarding characterization and development <strong>of</strong> the hydrometallurgical treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

waste material, both economic feasibility and return on investment <strong>for</strong> obtained<br />

<strong>process</strong>ing conditions were analyzed. Furthermore, this analysis was used in order to<br />

develop a preliminary techno-economical assessment <strong>of</strong> presented hydrometallurgical<br />

<strong>process</strong> adopted <strong>for</strong> use in small mobile plant taking into account limitation <strong>of</strong> necessary<br />

quantities <strong>of</strong> waste material as well as investment, addressed to small and medium sized<br />

enterprises (SMEs).<br />

Materials<br />

Material used in presented research is comminuted and mechanically pre-treated<br />

waste PCBs, as described in previous studies by authors [1, 9, 10]. Chemical<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> two samples was analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy, X-ray<br />

fluorescence spectroscopy and, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission<br />

spectroscopy. Obtained results together with literature data are presented in Table 1. In<br />

this paper, fractions (F), 0.071mm< F


Kamberović et al.- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>i... 141<br />

2mm and -1mm was examined in the range <strong>of</strong> 100 to 700 rpm. Solution used <strong>for</strong> testing<br />

was 30 wt. % NaCl, whose density matches the density <strong>of</strong> H2SO4 solution used <strong>for</strong><br />

leaching.<br />

Table 1. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> sample <strong>of</strong> WPCBs [9]<br />

Materials Sample 1 *<br />

Sample 2<br />

%(w/w)<br />

**<br />

Literature data [3]<br />

%(w/w)<br />

%(w/w)<br />

Cu 27.99 25.24 20<br />

Al 0.47 0.69 2<br />

Pb 2.17 2.22 2<br />

Zn 2.01 2.05 1<br />

Ni 1.23 0.93 2<br />

Fe 1.18 0.98 8<br />

Sn 3.26 3.17 4<br />

Au/ppm 440 890 1000<br />

Pt/ppm 57 17 -<br />

Ag/ppm 1490 1907 2000<br />

Pd/ppm 50 47 50<br />

Ceramics 20.41 22.14 max 30%<br />

Plastics 32.07 32.41 max 30%<br />

* WPCBs collected by S.E.Trade d.o.o. Belgrade, fraction –6mm<br />

** WPCBs collected by Institute Mihajlo Pupin, fraction –1+0.071mm<br />

In a first step fraction -2mm was examined. It was shown that the increase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stirring rate did not produce any effect on the waste material which remained at the<br />

bottom <strong>of</strong> the laboratory glass.<br />

In the next step fraction -1mm was examined when the intensification <strong>of</strong> material<br />

mixing was noticed at 200 rpm. At 300 rpm, all the granulate particles from the<br />

container are raised and caught mixing while floating particles slowly transit into the<br />

solution. Finally, at 600 rpm all particles <strong>of</strong> the waste materials are fully affected by<br />

mixing.<br />

In the industrial leaching conditions, stirring rate <strong>of</strong> 600 rpm is relatively high<br />

and could cause great trouble <strong>for</strong> carrying out <strong>of</strong> the <strong>process</strong> <strong>of</strong> leaching. It is assumed<br />

that with proper solid:liquid ratio, results obtained at 300 rpm will be satisfactory, and<br />

thus this parameter was fixed in the further analysis.<br />

According to experimental set up, reported in a previous study [1, 9,10], leaching<br />

tests were per<strong>for</strong>med in a glass vessel with 15.6 cm in diameter, with a condenser, steel<br />

impeller, oxygen dispersion tube and hydrogen peroxide dozer. Experimental set up is<br />

shown in Figure 1.<br />

Electrowinning (EW) was per<strong>for</strong>med in a rectangular electrolytic cell with<br />

dimensions 100×88×300mm with effective volume 2000 mL made <strong>of</strong> high density<br />

polypropylene. The cathode material was copper (Cu 99,99%) and anode was lead<br />

antimony alloy (PbSb7).


142 Metalurgija-MJoM Vol 17 (3) 2011 p. 139-149<br />

Fig.1. Experimental apparatus <strong>for</strong> leaching: 1.Electro-resistant heater; 2.Reaction<br />

glass vessel; 3.Cooler with condenser; 4.Mixer; 5.Oxygen tube; 6.Peroxide dozer;<br />

7.Digital pH and temperature measurement device<br />

Results and discussion<br />

Optimum <strong>process</strong>ing conditions were obtained by variation <strong>of</strong> different leaching<br />

parameters. <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> copper from the waste material was<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med using sulfuric acid as leaching agent. Solid residue after copper leaching<br />

step, was leached by thiourea in the presence <strong>of</strong> ferric ion (Fe2(SO4)3) as an oxidant in<br />

sulfuric acid solution, in order to extract gold. In the case <strong>of</strong> copper leaching, analysis<br />

was per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> both, laboratory and pilot scale, while gold leaching was tested only<br />

<strong>for</strong> laboratory scale. According to summarized results, optimum copper and gold<br />

leaching parameters are presented in Table 2.<br />

Table 2. Optimal gold and copper leaching conditions<br />

Parameter<br />

Copper leaching<br />

Gold leaching<br />

Laboratory scale Pilot scale<br />

Acid conc.<br />

H2SO4 conc. 1.5-2M 1.5-2M 10 g dm -3<br />

thiourea conc. / / 20 g dm -3<br />

Oxidants conc.<br />

H2O2 40mL/h 50 kg/t /<br />

O2 16L/h 80 L/kg/h /<br />

Fe 3+ / / 6 g dm -3<br />

Solid-liquid ratio 50-100g/L 150-200g/L 20 % <strong>of</strong> solid<br />

Temperature 75-80°C 70°C 40°C<br />

Stirring rate >300rpm ~300rpm 600 rpm<br />

Time >5h


Kamberović et al.- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>i... 143<br />

EW was per<strong>for</strong>med in order to extract metallic copper from leaching solution.<br />

Optimal EW conditions are shown in Table 3, while obtained copper deposit is<br />

illustrated in Figure 2.<br />

Table 3. Optimal EW conditions<br />

Voltage 2.1V<br />

Current 120-200A/m 2<br />

density<br />

Temperature 40ºC<br />

Time 15h<br />

Steering rate 100rpm<br />

Fig.2. Copper deposited on the cathode<br />

According to presented optimal <strong>process</strong>ing parameters, block diagram <strong>for</strong><br />

hydrometallurgical recovery <strong>of</strong> base and precious <strong>metals</strong>, using selective leaching<br />

agents from WPCBs was developed. Block diagram <strong>for</strong> hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing<br />

<strong>of</strong> WPCBs using sulfuric acid and thiourea leaching is shown on Figure 3.<br />

Fig.3. Block diagram <strong>for</strong> hydrometallurgical recovery <strong>of</strong> base and precious <strong>metals</strong> [9]


144 Metalurgija-MJoM Vol 17 (3) 2011 p. 139-149<br />

Although hydrometallurgy is relatively widely used in base and precious <strong>metals</strong><br />

<strong>process</strong>ing plants, the objective <strong>of</strong> this work was to discuss the possibility <strong>of</strong> providing a<br />

purely hydrometallurgical alternative to the pyrometalurgical <strong>process</strong> as more exact,<br />

easily controlled, less expensive, and less subjected to losses <strong>for</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> base and<br />

precious <strong>metals</strong> from WEEE. On the other hand, by adopting an entirely<br />

hydrometallurgical route <strong>for</strong> use in small mobile plant, economic benefits <strong>for</strong> SMEs<br />

may be possible, regarding low capital investment and necessary quantities <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

material.<br />

Process option investigated in this paper was based on preliminary results carried<br />

out on the pilot scale in the scope <strong>of</strong> the European project “Innovative<br />

<strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> Processes to recover Metals from WEEE including lamp and<br />

batteries – HydroWEEE” (FP 7 – research activities addressed to SMEs). Core objective<br />

<strong>of</strong> this project was development <strong>of</strong> suitable multi functional hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> base and precious <strong>metals</strong> from fluorescent powders coming from CRT<br />

and spent lamps, printed circuit boards, LCD and lithium spent batteries. The<br />

experience and knowledge obtained in the preliminary pilot plant tests gave important<br />

technological indications <strong>for</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> the small mobile plant HydroWEEE.<br />

Furthermore results obtained during the activities <strong>of</strong> project, particularly related to<br />

WPCBs in this paper, have been used <strong>for</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> techno-economical<br />

assessment <strong>for</strong> the new mobile hydrometallurgical plant. Schematic outline <strong>of</strong><br />

HydroWEEE mobile plant is presented in Figure 4.<br />

Fig.4. Outline <strong>of</strong> the mobile pilot plant placed in a transportable container [11]<br />

The techno-economical assessment <strong>for</strong> hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing route<br />

presented in Figure 3, was applied on the small mobile plant schematically shown in<br />

Figure 4. For this purpose the SuperPro Designer s<strong>of</strong>tware was used. Conceptual outline<br />

<strong>of</strong> hydrometallurgical treatment <strong>of</strong> WPCBs is shown in Figure 5.


Kamberović et al.- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>i... 145<br />

Fig.5. Outline <strong>of</strong> hydrometallurgical treatment <strong>of</strong> WPCBs<br />

With the intention to open up the possibility <strong>for</strong> an economic evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

presented hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing route, the techno-economical assessment is<br />

achieved through the development <strong>of</strong> gold amount variation models, present in waste<br />

material, as a crucial economical component <strong>of</strong> WPCBs. The models, developed by<br />

SuperPro Designer s<strong>of</strong>tware, calculate system efficiencies, total capital costs and<br />

production (operating) costs. This methodology was applied to the development <strong>of</strong> all


146 Metalurgija-MJoM Vol 17 (3) 2011 p. 139-149<br />

models and obtained results are directly comparable regarding time needed <strong>for</strong> return <strong>of</strong><br />

investment.<br />

Assessment was per<strong>for</strong>med by modeling two different amounts <strong>of</strong> input waste<br />

material, 50kg and 100kg <strong>of</strong> WEEE per batch, following the presented solid:liquid ratio,<br />

whereas <strong>for</strong> gold this ratio was in the range from 200ppm to 1000ppm. These data were<br />

combined to give cost and per<strong>for</strong>mance analysis <strong>for</strong> the integrated system.<br />

Prior to hydrometallurgical treatment, the mechanical pre-treatment <strong>of</strong> WPCBs<br />

was per<strong>for</strong>med. This procedure, in addition to other mechanical operations, includes<br />

granulation <strong>of</strong> input waste material according to previously described results [1].<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, presented models exclude mechanical pre-treatment cost.<br />

Fixed parameters, i.e. total capital cost and operating cost, were calculated<br />

according to prices in Serbia, October 2010, involving all economic factors in final<br />

executive summary, regarding total plant direct cost, total plant indirect cost, labor,<br />

utilities and raw material costs.<br />

Table 4 shows results obtained by per<strong>for</strong>ming simulation focused on calculation<br />

<strong>of</strong> payback time related to different amounts <strong>of</strong> gold. This calculation was used to assess<br />

the operational time, needed to achieve economical sustainability <strong>of</strong> such<br />

hydrometallurgical plant. Calculations were focused on the determination <strong>of</strong> total<br />

revenues <strong>of</strong> presented hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong> regarding gold recovery. Total<br />

income <strong>for</strong> each model was calculated according to LME prices, October 2010 [12] <strong>for</strong><br />

revenues, and it was crucial to determine economic sustainability <strong>of</strong> the whole <strong>process</strong>.<br />

Finally, based on these results, Diagrams 1 and 2 show the dependence between the<br />

operational time needed <strong>for</strong> return on investment and gold amount present in the waste<br />

material, concerning increase <strong>of</strong> payback time with decreasing gold amount.<br />

Table 4. a) Calculated dependence <strong>of</strong> gold amount vs. payback time, 50 kg <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

input material per batch<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – 50 kg<br />

Total Capital Investment 148,000$<br />

Capital Investment Charged to this Project 148,000$<br />

Operating Cost 97,000$/yr<br />

Gold amount, Total revenues, Return on investment, Payback time,<br />

ppm<br />

$/yr<br />

%<br />

years<br />

200 62,000 -15.97 not feasible<br />

300 83,000 -1.96 not feasible<br />

440 92,000 3.14 31.84<br />

500 100,000 8.39 11.92<br />

600 115,000 14.65 6.83<br />

700 132,000 21.29 4.70<br />

800 148,000 27.99 3.57<br />

890 159,000 32.36 3.09<br />

1000 161,000 32.95 3.02


Kamberović et al.- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>i... 147<br />

Table 4. b) Calculated dependence <strong>of</strong> gold amount vs. payback time, 100 kg <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

input material per batch<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – 100 kg<br />

Total Capital Investment 149,000$<br />

Capital Investment Charged to this Project 149,000$<br />

Operating Cost 144,000$/yr<br />

Gold amount, Total revenues, Return on investment, Payback time,<br />

ppm<br />

$/yr<br />

%<br />

years<br />

200 99,000 -21.68 not feasible<br />

300 129,000 -2.71 not feasible<br />

440 169,000 17.32 5.77<br />

500 188,000 24.88 4.02<br />

600 219,000 37.44 2.67<br />

700 252,000 50.75 1.97<br />

800 281,000 62.30 1.61<br />

890 299,000 69.65 1.44<br />

1000 339,000 85.55 1.17<br />

Gold (ppm)<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12<br />

Return on investment (year)<br />

Diagram 1. Dependence <strong>of</strong> gold amount vs. payback time, 50 kg <strong>of</strong> waste input material<br />

per batch


148 Metalurgija-MJoM Vol 17 (3) 2011 p. 139-149<br />

Gold (ppm)<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Return on investment (year)<br />

Diagram 2. Dependence <strong>of</strong> gold amount vs. payback time, 100 kg <strong>of</strong> waste input<br />

material per batch<br />

Conclusion<br />

In the presented work the techno-economical feasibility <strong>of</strong> the hydrometallurgical<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> WPCBs has been demonstrated, concerning great environmental and<br />

economical potentials that the development <strong>of</strong> an efficient hydrometallurgical route <strong>for</strong><br />

recovery <strong>of</strong> base and precious <strong>metals</strong> may <strong>of</strong>fer. According to these facts the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> such a technology responding to contemporary strict environmental<br />

requirements would be much easier. In addition, presented hydrometallurgical<br />

technology will allow the production <strong>of</strong> material with purity suitable <strong>for</strong> commercial<br />

use.<br />

According to models evaluated in this paper it is clear that the most important<br />

economic criteria is related to gold amount present in the waste material. Following<br />

these results, <strong>process</strong> is techno-economically feasible <strong>for</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> gold exceeding the<br />

limit value <strong>of</strong> 500ppm. Gold and silver obtained as cement powder could be sold to<br />

refinery or internally refined up to commercial purity Au and Ag metal powders in<br />

small a rafination equipment.<br />

Relatively insufficient widespread presence <strong>of</strong> hydrometallurgy in a field <strong>of</strong><br />

WEEE recycling still signifies domination <strong>of</strong> the pyrometallurgy. On the contrary to<br />

SMEs requirements, it is quite clear that presented technology imply a future alternative<br />

to pyrometalurgical <strong>process</strong> that can be readily applied in small plants, unlike large<br />

multisector companies not so dependent on investment as well <strong>for</strong> market share.


Kamberović et al.- <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong>i... 149<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

This work has been carried out with financial support <strong>of</strong> the EU within the<br />

project “Innovative <strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> Processes to recover Metals from WEEE<br />

including lamp and batteries – HydroWEEE”, FP 7 – Funding Scheme: research<br />

activities addressed to SMEs and Ministry <strong>of</strong> Science and Technical Development,<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia, project “Innovative synergy <strong>of</strong> by-products, waste minimization and<br />

clean technology in metallurgy”, No. 34033.<br />

References<br />

[1] Ž. Kamberović, M. Korać, D. Ivšić, V. Nikolić, M. Ranitović,<br />

<strong>Hydrometallurgical</strong> <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>extraction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> from electronic waste-Part I,<br />

Metalurgija – Journal <strong>of</strong> Metallurgy, 15 (4), 231 – 244, 2009<br />

[2] J. Cui, E. Forssberg, Mechanical recycling <strong>of</strong> waste electric and electronic<br />

equipment: a review, Journal <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Materials B99, 243-263, 2003<br />

[3] I.O. Ogunniyi, M.K.G. Vermaak, D.R. Groot, Chemical composition and<br />

liberation characterization <strong>of</strong> printed circuit board comminution fines <strong>for</strong><br />

beneficiation investigations Waste Management, 29 (7), 2140-2146, 2009<br />

[4] J.E.H<strong>of</strong>fmann, Recovering precious <strong>metals</strong>f rom electronic scrap, Jom-J. Miner.<br />

Met. Mater. Soc. 44 (7), 43–48, 1992<br />

[5] E.Y.L.Sum, The Recovery <strong>of</strong> Metals from Electronic Scrap, Jom-J.Miner. Met.<br />

Mater. Soc. 43 (4), 53–61, 1991<br />

[6] J.-c. Lee, H.T. Song, J.-M. Yoo, Present status <strong>of</strong> the recycling <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

electrical and electronic equipment in Korea, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 50 (4),<br />

380–397, 2007<br />

[7] J. Cui, L. Zhang, Metallurgical recovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>metals</strong> from electronic waste: A<br />

review, Journal <strong>of</strong> Hazardous Materials 158 (2-3), 228–256, 2008<br />

[8] P. Quinet, J. Proost, A. Van Lierde, Recovery <strong>of</strong> precious <strong>metals</strong> from electronic<br />

scrap by hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong>ing routes, Miner. Metall. Process. 22 (1)<br />

(2005) 17–22.<br />

[9] Ž. Kamberović, M. Korać, S.Vračar, M. Ranitović, Preliminary <strong>process</strong> analysis<br />

and development <strong>of</strong> hydrometallurgical <strong>process</strong> <strong>for</strong> the recovery <strong>of</strong> copper from<br />

waste printed circuit boards, 8 th International Symposium and Environmental<br />

Exhibition - Going Green CARE INNOVATION 2010, November 8-11, 2010,<br />

Vienna, Austria<br />

[10] Ž. Kamberović, M. Korać, D. Ivšić, V. Nikolić, M. Ranitović, Process selection<br />

<strong>for</strong> hydrometallurgical WPCBs recycling, 4 th International Conference –<br />

Processing and Structure <strong>of</strong> Materials, Palić, Serbia, 2010., Proceedings 67-72<br />

[11] F. Veglio, F. Beolchini, F. Pagnanelli, L. Toro, B. Kopacek, Process analysis,<br />

<strong>process</strong> design <strong>of</strong> pilot plant, first practical experiences in the pilot plant, 8 th<br />

International Symposium and Environmental Exhibition - Going Green CARE<br />

INNOVATION 2010, November 8-11, 2010, Vienna, Austria<br />

[12] London Metal Exchange, www.lme.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!