12.07.2015 Views

a non-linear scheme for pmepr reduction in mc-cdma system - IJCSET

a non-linear scheme for pmepr reduction in mc-cdma system - IJCSET

a non-linear scheme for pmepr reduction in mc-cdma system - IJCSET

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S.Tamilselvan et al./ International Journal of Computer Science & Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Technology (<strong>IJCSET</strong>)A NON-LINEAR SCHEME FOR PMEPRREDUCTION IN MC-CDMA SYSTEMS.TamilselvanPondicherry Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g College, Pondicherry -605014tamilselvan@pec.eduAbstract- The ma<strong>in</strong> feature of the next-generation wireless <strong>system</strong>s will be the convergence of multimediaservices such as speech, audio, video, image, and data. This implies that a future wireless term<strong>in</strong>al,by guarantee<strong>in</strong>g high speed data, will be able to connect to different networks <strong>in</strong> order to supportvarious services: switched traffic, IP data packets, and broadband stream<strong>in</strong>g services such as video.Multicarrier Code Division Multiple Access (MC-CDMA) <strong>scheme</strong> is the promis<strong>in</strong>g candidate <strong>for</strong> futurebroadband wireless <strong>system</strong>s, as it provides higher flexibility, transmission rates and spectral efficiency. Itcomb<strong>in</strong>es an orthogonal frequency division multiplex<strong>in</strong>g (OFDM) modulation with a Code DivisionMultiple Access (CDMA) <strong>scheme</strong> and hence exploits the advantages of OFDM as well as CDMA.A well-known, major drawback of conventional orthogonal frequency-division multiplex<strong>in</strong>g (OFDM)transmission <strong>scheme</strong>s is their strong envelope fluctuation and high peak-to-mean envelope power ratio(PMEPR), lead<strong>in</strong>g to power amplification difficulties. That is the OFDM signal which is the superpositionof large number of modulated subcarriers, usually exhibits a high <strong>in</strong>stantaneous peak value with respectto average value lead<strong>in</strong>g to envelope fluctuations. This is cited as a major drawback <strong>in</strong> OFDM <strong>scheme</strong>.This drawback is found <strong>in</strong> MC-CDMA too. As MC-CDMA signals have high envelope fluctuations and ahigh peak-to-mean envelope power ratio (PMEPR), which leads to amplification difficulties.In order to avoid the out-of-band radiation levels which are <strong>in</strong>herent to <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> distortion, poweramplifiers <strong>for</strong> OFDM transmission are required to have <strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> characteristics and/or a significant <strong>in</strong>putback off has to be adopted. There<strong>for</strong>e, reduced power efficiency is the price to pay <strong>for</strong> high bandwidthefficiency. A class of low-complexity signal-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong>s <strong>for</strong> reduced PMEPR, spectrally efficientMC-CDMA transmission was proposed.I. INTRODUCTIONThe ma<strong>in</strong> feature of the next-generation wireless <strong>system</strong>s will be the convergence of multi-media servicessuch as speech, audio, video, image, and data. This implies that a future wireless term<strong>in</strong>al, by guarantee<strong>in</strong>g highspeed data, will be able to connect to different networks <strong>in</strong> order to support various services: switched traffic,IP data packets, and broadband stream<strong>in</strong>g services such as video. Multicarrier code-division multiple-access(MC-CDMA) <strong>scheme</strong> is the potential candidate <strong>for</strong> future generation wireless <strong>system</strong>s.In traditional communications, the important components of a communications <strong>system</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude the transmitter,communication channel and receiver. The objective of a communications <strong>system</strong> is to successfully deliver<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation data from the source to receiver through a given channel. In multiuser communication <strong>system</strong>s, thefocus is to establish same transmission objectives but <strong>for</strong> multiple users which share a communication channel.The significance of multiuser <strong>system</strong>s is shown by the provision of applications such as mobile cellular phones,asymmetric digital subscriber l<strong>in</strong>es (ADSL) services and other uses such as satellite communications. There areseveral multiple access <strong>scheme</strong>s that can be used to provide a communication service to multiple users. Some ofthe fundamental multiple access <strong>scheme</strong>s are Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA), Time DivisionMultiple Access (TDMA), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) and Space Division Multiple Access(SDMA).The Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g (OFDM) modulation is one specific <strong>for</strong>m of FDMAmultiple access <strong>scheme</strong>. OFDM is an effective multiple access technique that possesses many desirableproperties. The OFDM method is bandwidth efficient, easily implemented and OFDM signals are robust aga<strong>in</strong>stmultipath fad<strong>in</strong>g. A particular important problem that exists <strong>in</strong> OFDM transmission is that OFDM signals oftenexhibit high peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR). In practice this high PAPR frequently cause signal distortionand <strong>in</strong>crease bit error rate when high power amplifier (HPA) is used. The objective of this project is to conductan <strong>in</strong> depth <strong>in</strong>vestigation of a particular technique of subcarrier pulse shap<strong>in</strong>g proposed <strong>in</strong> the literature <strong>for</strong>PAPR <strong>reduction</strong> <strong>in</strong> OFDM signals.ISSN : 2229-3345 Vol. 3 No. 3 March 2012 14


S.Tamilselvan et al./ International Journal of Computer Science & Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Technology (<strong>IJCSET</strong>)• The zero padded frequency-doma<strong>in</strong> block { , k= 0,1,…N’-1}, where N’ is a powerof two, is <strong>for</strong>med byadd<strong>in</strong>g N-N’ zeros to the orig<strong>in</strong>al frequency-doma<strong>in</strong> blockis given Eqn.(1).As other multicarrier signals, MC-CDMA signals have high envelope fluctuations and a high peak-to-meanenvelopee power ratio (PMEPR), which leads to amplification difficulties. This is particularly important <strong>for</strong> theupl<strong>in</strong>k transmission, s<strong>in</strong>ce efficientlow-cost power amplification is desirable at the mobile term<strong>in</strong>als (MTs).Moreover, the transmission over time-dispersivechannels destroys the orthogonality between spread<strong>in</strong>g codes,which might lead to significant multiple-access <strong>in</strong>terference levels and frequent runn<strong>in</strong>g of HPA <strong>in</strong>to saturationregion reduces the power efficiency. To reduce the envelope fluctuations of the transmitted signals, whilema<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the spectral efficiency, the MC-CDMA signal associated to each MT is submitted to a clipp<strong>in</strong>gdevice, followed by a frequency doma<strong>in</strong> filter<strong>in</strong>g operation. However, the<strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> distortion effects can behigh when an MC-CDMA transmitter with reduced envelope fluctuations is <strong>in</strong>tended.II. CHOICE OF PMEPR REDUCTION TECHNIQUEThere have been many proposal of methods <strong>in</strong>which the power ratio can be reducedd <strong>in</strong> MC-CDMA multi-ofcarrier signals. Some researchers have developedd methods of achiev<strong>in</strong>g lowPMEPR through the application“partial transmits sequence, block cod<strong>in</strong>g and selected mapp<strong>in</strong>g”. Other techniques oflower<strong>in</strong>g thePMEPRratio which have been published <strong>in</strong>volve complicated applications of supplementaryFFT function blocksrequir<strong>in</strong>gmore functional components. In addition, <strong>non</strong>-hardware basedapproaches that also <strong>in</strong>cur otherdisadvantages such as add<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation <strong>in</strong> overhead parameters or handshak<strong>in</strong>g algorithms to control PMEPRlevels. Additional <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation bear<strong>in</strong>g causes OFDM signal to be less bandwidth efficient.Though a class of low-complexity signal-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong>s <strong>for</strong> reduced PMEPR, spectrally efficient MC-aCDMA transmission proposed requires supplementary FFTfunction blocks, but this <strong>scheme</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>es<strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>operation <strong>in</strong>the time doma<strong>in</strong> with a <strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>, filter<strong>in</strong>g operation <strong>in</strong> the frequency doma<strong>in</strong>. Thisfrequency-doma<strong>in</strong> filter<strong>in</strong>g, besidess not requir<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creased guard time to avoid <strong>in</strong>tersymbol <strong>in</strong>terference(ISI), canbe very selective, e.g., completely remov<strong>in</strong>g theout-of-band radiation effects of the preced<strong>in</strong>g<strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>operation.More recently, a similar class of signal-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong>ss <strong>for</strong> the samegoals was analyzed. The differencelies <strong>in</strong> the type of <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> operation with each class: a <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>ity operat<strong>in</strong>g on thecomplex MC-CDMAsamples <strong>in</strong> [8], and a <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>ity which separately operates ontheir real (I)and imag<strong>in</strong>ary (Q) parts <strong>in</strong>[9]. Our<strong>scheme</strong> considers the <strong>for</strong>mer class only, which provides better per<strong>for</strong>mance,and studies the cases where a given<strong>scheme</strong> (<strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> time-doma<strong>in</strong> operation followed by frequency-doma<strong>in</strong>filter<strong>in</strong>g) is repeatedly used, <strong>in</strong> aniterative way.Though the proposed method that is focused on does not require additional FFT’s operators and only requires<strong>in</strong>gle FFT and IFFT functions <strong>in</strong> the transceiverss to operate. The technique <strong>in</strong>volves the shap<strong>in</strong>g of time limitedsubcarrier pulses. Themodificationof subcarrier pulse shapes does not add extra <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation to the exist<strong>in</strong>gstructure of MC-CDMA signals and hence bandwidth efficiency is unaffected. Cod<strong>in</strong>gmethods as describedpreviously can assist <strong>in</strong>controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terchannel <strong>in</strong>terference through channel cod<strong>in</strong>g.There<strong>for</strong>e, through the use of this<strong>non</strong>-<strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> signal process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong>, certa<strong>in</strong> pulse shape characteristics canbe tested<strong>in</strong> search <strong>for</strong> the best pulse characteristics. Theobjective is to f<strong>in</strong>d thegeneral pulse shapecharacteristics that promote the improvements <strong>in</strong> lower<strong>in</strong>g the factor of high PMEPRfound <strong>in</strong> MC-CDMAsignals.III. TRANSMISSION OF MC-CDMA SIGNALA WIDE CLASS OF NONLINEAR SIGNAL-PROCESSING SCHEMEWith the basic signal-process<strong>in</strong>g<strong>scheme</strong>s considered here <strong>for</strong> MC-CDMAtransmission is shown <strong>in</strong>Figure 1,each block of time-doma<strong>in</strong> samples is generated as follows.Figure 1 BlockDiagram <strong>for</strong> Proposed TechniqueeISSN : 2229-3345 Vol. 3 No. 3 March 2012 15


S.Tamilselvan et al./ International Journal of Computer Science & Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Technology (<strong>IJCSET</strong>) ; , ,… (1)• The Inverse Discrete Fourier Trans<strong>for</strong>m (IDFT) of this frequency-doma<strong>in</strong> block is computed, lead<strong>in</strong>g to thetime doma<strong>in</strong> block { ; n=0,1,...N-1} with is given Eqn.(2). ∑ (2) • Each sample is submitted to a <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> operation(an envelope clipp<strong>in</strong>g)accord<strong>in</strong>g to, lead<strong>in</strong>g to themodified block { ; n=0,1,…,N’-1}, where is given Eqn.(3). | | (3)• A discrete Fourier trans<strong>for</strong>m (DFT) br<strong>in</strong>gs the <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>ly modified block back to the frequency doma<strong>in</strong>,where a shap<strong>in</strong>g operation is per<strong>for</strong>med by a multiplier bank with selected coefficients, {Gk; k=0,1,…,N’-1}, so as to obta<strong>in</strong> the block , with is given by the Eqn.(4). ;,,…. (4)• The f<strong>in</strong>al frequency-doma<strong>in</strong> block results from by remov<strong>in</strong>g the zeros, where is shown <strong>in</strong>Eqn.(5). ;,,…….. (5)• Append<strong>in</strong>g zeros to each <strong>in</strong>put block prior to comput<strong>in</strong>g the required IDFT is a well-known OFDMimplementation technique, which is equivalent to oversampl<strong>in</strong>g, by a factor given <strong>in</strong> Eqn.(6) below, theideal MC-CDMA burst. (6)• The subsequent <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> operation is crucial <strong>for</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the envelope fluctuations, whereas the frequencydoma<strong>in</strong>filter<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g the set given <strong>in</strong> Eqn.(7) can reduce the result<strong>in</strong>g spectral spread<strong>in</strong>g (of course, withsome regrowth of the envelope fluctuations). ;,,,……, (7)The removal of subcarriers with zero amplitude reduces the computational ef<strong>for</strong>t and corresponds todecimation <strong>in</strong> the time doma<strong>in</strong>. For a given and a careful selection of , the <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> characteristic (<strong>for</strong> a given<strong>in</strong>put level) and the set can {Gk} ensure small envelope fluctuations while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g low out-of-bandradiation and <strong>in</strong>-band self-<strong>in</strong>terference levels. When the <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> operation is chosen to be an ideal envelopeclipp<strong>in</strong>g, with clipp<strong>in</strong>g. , , (8)It should be mentioned that this wide class of signal-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong>s <strong>in</strong>cludes, as specific cases, <strong>scheme</strong>sproposed so far. where the same clipp<strong>in</strong>g is adopted when assum<strong>in</strong>g ,the condition <strong>in</strong> Eqn.(8) with <strong>for</strong> the <strong>in</strong>bandsubcarriers, and out-of-band. It should also be mentioned that, <strong>for</strong> an ideal envelope clipp<strong>in</strong>g, the proposedsignal-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong> can be shown to be equivalent to the peak cancellation method.A more sophisticated technique, allow<strong>in</strong>g improved PMEPR reduc<strong>in</strong>g results, could be simply developed onthe basis of the signal-process<strong>in</strong>g approach described above. Such a technique consists of repeatedly us<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> aniterative way, the signal-process<strong>in</strong>g cha<strong>in</strong> which leads from to <strong>in</strong> Fig.1. The technique proposed <strong>in</strong> [17]corresponds to the particular case where the <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> operation is an envelope clipp<strong>in</strong>g, and the frequencydoma<strong>in</strong>filter<strong>in</strong>g is characterized by <strong>for</strong> the Gk=0 <strong>for</strong> the out-of-band subcarriers.ISSN : 2229-3345 Vol. 3 No. 3 March 2012 16


S.Tamilselvan et al./ International Journal of Computer Science & Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Technology (<strong>IJCSET</strong>)A. Def<strong>in</strong>ition of PMEPRIV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe cont<strong>in</strong>uous time signal x(t) represents the sum of all the parallel transmission streams as expressed <strong>in</strong>Eqn.(9). Peak-to-mean envelope power ratio can clearly be recognised through the understand<strong>in</strong>g of the<strong>in</strong>dividual numerator and denom<strong>in</strong>ator expressions. The <strong>for</strong>mer specifies the maximum transmitted signalsquared value, which represents the peak power of the total transmitted MC-CDMA signal. The latter def<strong>in</strong>esthe average power across the sum of composite time doma<strong>in</strong> signals def<strong>in</strong>ed by x(t). The average transmittedsignal power can be found through the time average expectation of the entire signal power of the comb<strong>in</strong>ed Nsub-channels. |||| (9)A ratio is taken between the peak and the average power of the MC-CDMA signal to give a power ratio.PMEPR measurement of power ratio is derived from sampled discrete <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation <strong>in</strong> the signal <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation.B. Maximum PMEPR PlotThe particular equation of <strong>in</strong>terest is the maximum PMEPR equation def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Eqn.(4), which specifies theworst case PMEPR. The def<strong>in</strong>ition of maximum PMEPR is entirely based on the summ<strong>in</strong>g of the pulse valuesthroughout the pulse <strong>in</strong>terval. The important factor that should be noted is that <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g pulse heights directlyaffects the maximum PMEPR.C. Cumulative Distribution FunctionThe occurrences of peak fluctuations seems to be follow<strong>in</strong>g CDF <strong>in</strong> a conventional MC-CDMA <strong>system</strong>. TheCDF of a probability distribution function evaluated at a number ‘x’, is the probability of the event occurrencesthat a Random Variable(X) with that distribution is less than or equal to ‘x’. The typical range of PMEPRvalues are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.The behavior of the PMEPR is seen to decrease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g ‘n’ which reflects on the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gcorrelation between subcarriers. The rate of decay <strong>in</strong> PMEPR plot is reduced as ‘n’ tend to a large value as thecurves approach a horizontal asymptote.For the normalised s<strong>in</strong>e pulse case, the plot of the maximum PMEPR aga<strong>in</strong>st the shape parameter ‘n’ <strong>in</strong> termsof CCDF <strong>for</strong> each iteration is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.Figure 2 CDF plot of PMEPRISSN : 2229-3345 Vol. 3 No. 3 March 2012 17


S.Tamilselvan et al./ International Journal of Computer Science & Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Technology (<strong>IJCSET</strong>)TABLE 1COMLEMENTARY CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTIONFUNCTIONNo. ofIterationPMEPR(dB)0 8.7550 20By plott<strong>in</strong>g the maximum PMEPR <strong>for</strong> a normalised s<strong>in</strong>e pulse, an attractive result was ga<strong>in</strong>ed. It can beobserved that the normalisation of s<strong>in</strong>e pulses have brought PMEPR levels lower than the unmodified s<strong>in</strong>epulse. The maximum PMEPR has changed considerably achiev<strong>in</strong>g a greater rate of PMEPR <strong>reduction</strong> per ‘n’.This implies that lower<strong>in</strong>g the energy of the pulses has direct impact on the lower<strong>in</strong>g of PMEPR.SNR(dB)1 7.5660 19.42 6.8031 17.43 4.8830 16.34 4.1113 15.9Figure 3 CCDF plots of each iterationAn OFDM modulation with N=64 subcarriers and an M-QAM constellation, with a Gray mapp<strong>in</strong>g rule, oneach subcarrier is considered. The set of multiply<strong>in</strong>g co efficient{Gk; k=0,1,2,…N’-1} has a trapezoidal shape,with Gk=1 <strong>for</strong> the N data subcarriers (<strong>in</strong>-band region), dropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>ly to 0 along the first (N1-N)/2 out-ofbandsubcarriers at both sides of the <strong>in</strong>-band region, which means N1 <strong>non</strong>zero subcarriers. The <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>operation is chosen to be an ideal envelope clipp<strong>in</strong>g .On consider<strong>in</strong>g the basic, s<strong>in</strong>gle-iteration signal-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong>s, Figure 4 is concerned with thebandwidth-efficiency issues when us<strong>in</strong>g these <strong>scheme</strong>s, with a clipp<strong>in</strong>g level of 2.0. A well-known PSD-relatedfunction was adopted: the so-called fractional out-of-band power (FOBP), def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>for</strong> a symmetrical PSD.Clearly, this clipp<strong>in</strong>g can lead to high out-of-band radiation levels.However, by us<strong>in</strong>g a frequency-doma<strong>in</strong> filter<strong>in</strong>g with Gk=1 <strong>for</strong> the data subcarriers and 0 <strong>for</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gones (i.e.) we can reduce these levels to those of conventional MC-CDMA. Further <strong>reduction</strong> is achieved if thisfilter<strong>in</strong>g is comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the w<strong>in</strong>dow<strong>in</strong>g procedure.ISSN : 2229-3345 Vol. 3 No. 3 March 2012 18


S.Tamilselvan et al./ International Journal of Computer Science & Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Technology (<strong>IJCSET</strong>)Figure 4 PMEPR Behaviour of each iterationThe transmitter employs a power amplifier which is quasi-<strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> with<strong>in</strong> the range of variations of the <strong>in</strong>putenvelope, and the coherent detection operates under perfect synchronization and channel estimation.On assum<strong>in</strong>g L iterations <strong>for</strong> two users and an envelope clipp<strong>in</strong>g level with 2.0 , while Gk=1<strong>for</strong> the <strong>in</strong>-bandsubcarriers and 0 <strong>for</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g From the Table 1, it is clear that the envelope fluctuations by us<strong>in</strong>g theiterative technique can be reduced. The maximum envelope can be already close to with just three or fouriterations.D. BER Per<strong>for</strong>manceFigure 5 Non-<strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>ity of HPAThe conventional BER per<strong>for</strong>mance of a MC-CDMA <strong>system</strong> without employ<strong>in</strong>g the an envelope clipp<strong>in</strong>g andfilter<strong>in</strong>g procedure <strong>in</strong> an iterative way is approximately as depicted <strong>in</strong> figure 6.Figure 6 Conventional BER of MC-CDMAISSN : 2229-3345 Vol. 3 No. 3 March 2012 19


S.Tamilselvan et al./ International Journal of Computer Science & Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Technology (<strong>IJCSET</strong>)Figure 7 BER per<strong>for</strong>mances of each iterationOn consider<strong>in</strong>g the correspond<strong>in</strong>g BER per<strong>for</strong>mances on an ideal additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN)channel, still with an envelope clipp<strong>in</strong>g as the <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> operation. As expected, the required Eb/N0 decreaseswhen clipp<strong>in</strong>g level is <strong>in</strong>creased, and the BER per<strong>for</strong>mances with are already close to the correspond<strong>in</strong>gper<strong>for</strong>mances with <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite users. However, <strong>in</strong>creased values of subcarriers imply a higher PMEPR, i.e., an<strong>in</strong>creased power amplification backoff.Figure 6 shows the BER <strong>for</strong> each iteration <strong>in</strong> comparison with required/conventional BER per<strong>for</strong>mance. Theoptimum values of clipp<strong>in</strong>g level are 2.0 <strong>for</strong> 4, 2.6 <strong>for</strong> 16, and3.2 <strong>for</strong> 64QAM.Moreover, these optimum values of clipp<strong>in</strong>g levels are almost <strong>in</strong>dependent of the frequency-doma<strong>in</strong> filter<strong>in</strong>gef<strong>for</strong>t. When not consider<strong>in</strong>g the iterative procedure analyzed <strong>in</strong> chapter 3, where the signal-process<strong>in</strong>g cha<strong>in</strong> isrepeatedly used which leads from to peak amplitude clipped pulses, so as to provide an additional <strong>reduction</strong> ofthe envelope fluctuations while preserv<strong>in</strong>g a compact spectrum.From the Figure 7, the BER per<strong>for</strong>mance of MC-CDMA with this <strong>reduction</strong> technique reaches theconventional MC-CDMA per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased no. of iteration and degradation <strong>in</strong> SNR.V. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCHIn this work, a problem experienced <strong>in</strong> the OFDM modulation technique <strong>in</strong> the MC-CDMA <strong>system</strong> has beenstudied. The various multiple access techniques that were common <strong>in</strong> modern communications <strong>system</strong>s are<strong>in</strong>troduced. OFDM modulation was <strong>in</strong>troduced which was a specific <strong>for</strong>m of multiple access technique based onFDMA and also discusses how OFDM modulation operates and commences the advantages and disadvantagesof the modulation <strong>scheme</strong>. The PAPR problem that is commonly experienced <strong>in</strong> MC-CDMA signals was<strong>in</strong>troduced provid<strong>in</strong>g the motivation <strong>for</strong> an effective solution.Consequently a wide class of digital signal-process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong>s <strong>for</strong> MC-CDMA transmission which comb<strong>in</strong>ea <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> operation <strong>in</strong> the time doma<strong>in</strong>, and a <strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> filter<strong>in</strong>g operation <strong>in</strong> the frequency doma<strong>in</strong> was presentedand evaluated. The ultimate goal of these <strong>scheme</strong>s is to reduce substantially the envelope fluctuation of ord<strong>in</strong>aryMC-CDMA <strong>system</strong>, while keep<strong>in</strong>g its high spectral efficiency and allow<strong>in</strong>g a low-cost, power-efficientimplementation.A detailed evaluation of MC-CDMA signal transmission techniques which employ the signal-process<strong>in</strong>g<strong>scheme</strong>s considered here was carried out, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g computations of power spectra, BER per<strong>for</strong>mances, andachieved PMEPR values. Such evaluation has taken advantage of our statistical characterization of thetransmitted blocks and <strong>in</strong>cluded other implementation issues (such as the impact of the time-w<strong>in</strong>dow<strong>in</strong>gprocedures). A set of per<strong>for</strong>mance results was presented and discussed, show<strong>in</strong>g that the proposed basic<strong>scheme</strong>s can provide a significant PMEPR <strong>reduction</strong> while keep<strong>in</strong>g a high spectral efficiency.The iterative technique based on the basic <strong>scheme</strong>s was shown to allow a further PMEPR <strong>reduction</strong>, alsoma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the spectral efficiency of conventional MC-CDMA, with only a moderately <strong>in</strong>creasedimplementation complexity. When compared with other distortionless techniques, also capable of reduc<strong>in</strong>g thePMEPR of MC-CDMA signals, these signal process<strong>in</strong>g techniques <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g deliberate <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> distortionwere shown to offer improved per<strong>for</strong>mance/complexity tradeoffs, <strong>for</strong> small constellations and a high number ofsubcarriers.The <strong>non</strong>- <strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> signal process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong> has been used to test narrowband and broadband pulses conclud<strong>in</strong>gthat broadband pulses were far superior <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g PMEPR. Numerical results demonstrate that improvementsISSN : 2229-3345 Vol. 3 No. 3 March 2012 20


S.Tamilselvan et al./ International Journal of Computer Science & Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Technology (<strong>IJCSET</strong>)<strong>in</strong> PMEPR <strong>reduction</strong> require certa<strong>in</strong> frequency characteristics of subcarriers pulses. Some of thesecharacteristics <strong>in</strong>clude:• Large ma<strong>in</strong> lobe width• Low sidelobe peaks• High or flat amplitude ma<strong>in</strong> lobe responsesThe worst case PMEPR values are obta<strong>in</strong>ed through the use of rectangular subcarrier pulses with highsidelobe peaks <strong>in</strong> their response. It is suggested that pulses with relatively low side lobe peaks should be used todeviate the worst case scenario. This is because the worst case PMEPR is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g rectangular pulses.The <strong>non</strong>- <strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> signal process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong> proves to be a simple approach to PMEPR <strong>reduction</strong> based onmodifications to the exist<strong>in</strong>g MC-CDMA signal structure. Unlike techniques such as PTS and precod<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>signal process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong> does not require additional implementation complexity, modification <strong>in</strong> thereceiver structure or overhead cod<strong>in</strong>g at the expense of bandwidth respectively. The <strong>non</strong>- <strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> signalprocess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong> used <strong>in</strong> this thesis per<strong>for</strong>ms well <strong>in</strong> assist<strong>in</strong>g the study of efficient signal characteristics thatimprove PMEPR <strong>reduction</strong>.A typical <strong>scheme</strong> of signal process<strong>in</strong>g has been tested <strong>in</strong> this project. More optimized <strong>scheme</strong>s should betested <strong>in</strong> order to ga<strong>in</strong> a deeper understand<strong>in</strong>g of other signal characteristics and their effects on the per<strong>for</strong>manceof PMEPR <strong>reduction</strong>.VI. REFERENCES[1] L. Cim<strong>in</strong>i, Jr., “Analysis and simulation of a digital mobile channel us<strong>in</strong>g orthogonal frequency-division multiplex<strong>in</strong>g,” IEEETransaction Communication., vol. COM-33, pp. 665–675, July 1985.[2] A. Jones and T. Wilk<strong>in</strong>son, “Comb<strong>in</strong>ed cod<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> error control and <strong>in</strong>creased robustness to <strong>system</strong> <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>ities <strong>in</strong> OFDM,”Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference., vol. 2, Atlanta, GA, May 1996, pp. 904–908.[3] S. Müller and J. Huber, “OFDM with reduced peak-to-average power ratio by optimum comb<strong>in</strong>ation of partial transmitsequences,” Electronics Letters, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 368–369, Feb. 1997.[4] S. Müller, R. Bäuml, R. Fischer, and J. Huber, “OFDM with reduced peak-to-average power ratio by multiple signalrepresentation,”Annual Telecommunication, vol. 52, pp. 58–67, Feb. 1997.[5] L. Cim<strong>in</strong>i, Jr. and N. Sollenberger, “Peak-to-average power <strong>reduction</strong> of an OFDM signal us<strong>in</strong>g partial transmit sequences,”IEEE Communication Letters, vol. 4, pp. 86–88, Mar. 2000.[6] R. O’Neill and L. Lopes, “Envelope variations and spectral splatter <strong>in</strong> clipped multicarrier signals,” Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of IEEEPersonal, Indoor, Mobile Radio Conference., vol. 1, Sept. 1995, pp. 71–75.[7] X. Li and L. J. Cim<strong>in</strong>i, Jr., “Effects of clipp<strong>in</strong>g and filter<strong>in</strong>g on the per<strong>for</strong>mance of OFDM,” IEEE Communication Letters, vol.2, pp. 131–133, May 1998.[8] R. D<strong>in</strong>is and A. Gusmão, “A class of signal process<strong>in</strong>g algorithms <strong>for</strong> good power/bandwidth tradeoffs with OFDMtransmission,” Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of IEEE International Symposium In<strong>for</strong>mation Theory, June 2000, pp. 216–216.[9] “A new class of signal process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>scheme</strong>s <strong>for</strong> bandwidth-efficient OFDM transmission with low envelope fluctuation,”Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 1, pp. 658–662, May 2001.[10] H. Rowe, “Memory less <strong>non</strong><strong>l<strong>in</strong>ear</strong>ities with Gaussian <strong>in</strong>put: Elementary results,” Bell Syst. Tech. Journal, vol. 61, pp. 1519–1525, Sept. 1982.[11] H. Ochiai and H. Imai, “Per<strong>for</strong>mance of deliberate clipp<strong>in</strong>g with adaptive symbol selection <strong>for</strong> strictly bandlimited OFDM<strong>system</strong>s,” IEEE Journal on Selected of Areas Communication, vol. 18, pp. 2270–2277, Nov. 2000.[12] J. Armstrong, “New OFDM peak-to-average power <strong>reduction</strong> <strong>scheme</strong>,” Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference,vol. 1, pp. 756–760 May 2001.[13] H. Ochiai and H. Imai, “Per<strong>for</strong>mance analysis of deliberately clipped OFDM signals,” IEEE Transaction Communication, vol.50, pp. 89–101, Jan. 2002.[14] R. D<strong>in</strong>is and A. Gusmão, “Per<strong>for</strong>mance evaluation of an iterative PMEPR-reduc<strong>in</strong>g technique <strong>for</strong> OFDM transmission,”Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of IEEE GLOBECOM, vol. 1, pp. 20–2, Dec. 2003[15] R. Nee and R. Prasad, OFDM <strong>for</strong> Wireless Multimedia Communications. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2000.[16] T. May and H. Rohl<strong>in</strong>g, “Reduc<strong>in</strong>g the peak-to-average power ratio <strong>in</strong> OFDM radio transmission <strong>system</strong>s,” Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of IEEEVehicular Technology Conference, vol. 3, pp. 2474–2478 ,May 1998.[17] J. Armstrong, “Peak-to-average power <strong>reduction</strong> <strong>for</strong> OFDM by repeated clipp<strong>in</strong>g and frequency-doma<strong>in</strong> filter<strong>in</strong>g,” IEEEElectronics Letters, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 246–247, Feb. 2002.[18] R. D<strong>in</strong>is and A. Gusmão, “On the per<strong>for</strong>mance evaluation of OFDM transmission us<strong>in</strong>g clipp<strong>in</strong>g techniques, ”Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs ofIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 5, pp. 2923–2928, Sept. 1999.[19] G. Stette, “Calculation of <strong>in</strong>termodulation from a s<strong>in</strong>gle carrier amplitude characteristic,” IEEE Transaction Communication.,vol. COM-22, pp. 319–323, Mar. 1974.[20] M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover, 1972.ISSN : 2229-3345 Vol. 3 No. 3 March 2012 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!