12.07.2015 Views

financial market simulation based on intelligent agents – case study

financial market simulation based on intelligent agents – case study

financial market simulation based on intelligent agents – case study

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Journal of Applied Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Sciences2. The Use of Agent-<str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> Methods for Modelling and Simulati<strong>on</strong> the Behaviour of RealFinancial MarketsThe behaviour of real <str<strong>on</strong>g>financial</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g>s shows some significant deviati<strong>on</strong>s from the efficient<str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g>hypothesis, which argues that the <str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g> price reflects all informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the fair value oftraded assets and should not deviate from it. In fact, the <str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g> price often differs from the fair valueof assets, which is reflected especially in the so-called <str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g> bubbles (Ilie 2011). Market bubble is anartificial overvaluati<strong>on</strong> of assets due to excessive demand, or <strong>on</strong> the other hand it is the <str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g>collapse due to the oversupply of the assets. Efficient-<str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g> hypothesis is according to (Schleifer2000) <str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> three basic assumpti<strong>on</strong>s: the investors are able to rate the assets with unlimitedrati<strong>on</strong>ality. If some investors are not rati<strong>on</strong>al, their purchases are random and therefore they canceleach other out, and finally the influence of irrati<strong>on</strong>al investors <strong>on</strong> the price of the assets is eliminatedby rati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>agents</strong>. (Burian 2010).The model described in this article is <str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the agent-<str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> model of <str<strong>on</strong>g>financial</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g>(Westerhoff, 2009), which, like many similar models (Brock and Hommes 1997, 1998; G<strong>on</strong>çalves2003; Kirman 1991, 1993; Lux 1998; Lux and Marchesi 1999) describes some typical characteristicsof the real <str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g>. An agent-<str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> model is a computerized <str<strong>on</strong>g>simulati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> of a number of decisi<strong>on</strong>makers(<strong>agents</strong>) and instituti<strong>on</strong>s, which interact through prescribed rules (Vymetal and Sperka, (2011).The <strong>agents</strong> can be as diverse as needed - from c<strong>on</strong>sumers to policy-makers and Wall Streetprofessi<strong>on</strong>als - and the instituti<strong>on</strong>al structure can include everything from banks to the government.Such models do not rely <strong>on</strong> the assumpti<strong>on</strong> that the ec<strong>on</strong>omy will move towards a predeterminedequilibrium state, as other models do. Instead, at any given time, each agent acts according to itscurrent situati<strong>on</strong>, the state of the world around it and the rules governing its behaviour. An individualc<strong>on</strong>sumer, for example, might decide whether to save or spend <str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the rate of inflati<strong>on</strong>, his or hercurrent optimism about the future, and behavioural rules deduced from psychology experiments. Thecomputer keeps track of the many agent interacti<strong>on</strong>s, to see what happens over time. Agent-<str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>simulati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>s can handle a far wider range of n<strong>on</strong>linear behaviour than c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al equilibriummodels. Policy-makers can thus simulate an artificial ec<strong>on</strong>omy under different policy scenarios andquantitatively explore their c<strong>on</strong>sequences.The cure for macroec<strong>on</strong>omic theory, however, may have been worse than the disease. Duringthe last quarter of the twentieth century, ‘rati<strong>on</strong>al expectati<strong>on</strong>s’ emerged as the dominant paradigm inec<strong>on</strong>omics. This approach assumes that humans have perfect access to informati<strong>on</strong> and adapt instantlyand rati<strong>on</strong>ally to new situati<strong>on</strong>s, maximizing their l<strong>on</strong>g-run pers<strong>on</strong>al advantage. Of course real peopleoften act <strong>on</strong> the basis of overc<strong>on</strong>fidence, fear and peer pressure - topics that behavioural ec<strong>on</strong>omics isnow addressing. (Farmer and Foley 2009)But there is a still larger problem. Even if rati<strong>on</strong>al expectati<strong>on</strong>s are a reas<strong>on</strong>able model ofhuman behaviour, the mathematical machinery is cumbersome and requires drastic simplificati<strong>on</strong>s toget tractable results. The equilibrium models that were developed, such as those used by the USFederal Reserve, by necessity stripped away most of the structure of a real ec<strong>on</strong>omy. There are nobanks or derivatives, much less sub-prime mortgages or credit default swaps - these introduce toomuch n<strong>on</strong>linearity and complexity for equilibrium methods to handle. Agent-<str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> models could helpto evaluate policies designed to foster ec<strong>on</strong>omic recovery.We may use agent-<str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> methods in the <strong>case</strong> of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>financial</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g>, which is a relativelybalanced <str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g> (supply roughly coincides with the demand) with bubbles and busts. Furthermore, inc<strong>on</strong>trast to the efficient-<str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g> hypothesys assumpti<strong>on</strong>s is more realistic to assume that (Burian 2010):• Agents are limited <strong>on</strong>ly rati<strong>on</strong>al. They do not have all informati<strong>on</strong> or they are not able tointerpret it correctly.• Agents are heterogeneous. They react with varying sensitivity to the reports of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>market</str<strong>on</strong>g>developments and affect them differently str<strong>on</strong>g random factors that influence their decisi<strong>on</strong>s.• Agents make decisi<strong>on</strong>s influenced by the opini<strong>on</strong>s of their close colleagues.The model, which we describe in this paper, is <str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> these assumpti<strong>on</strong>s.250

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!