Linking Marketing Metrics to Financial Performance - Emory ...
Linking Marketing Metrics to Financial Performance - Emory ...
Linking Marketing Metrics to Financial Performance - Emory ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
focus on the short-term outcomes(Anderson 1982; Dekimpe andHanssens 1995). While companiessuch as Kraft and General Mills areselling at two <strong>to</strong> three times bookvalue, P&G’s valuation is a lofty 8.7times book value, almost equallydivided in current value and futureexpected performance. In otherwords, while senior managerscomplain that inves<strong>to</strong>rs put far <strong>to</strong>omuch on short-term quarterlyearnings, the market actually putsthe majority of value on the ability <strong>to</strong>manage growth and risk in thefuture.A fundamental question still remainsunanswered – as <strong>to</strong> what is the longtermimpact of many marketingactivities? Research on this questionis sparse (only recent exceptions areDekimpe and Hanssens 1999, andMela, Gupta and Lehmann 1997).The long-term impact could manifestin a variety of ways – it could reducerisks associated with cash flowstreams generated by marketing,and create a more sustainablesource of revenues for the firm. Thismight play a more vital role from theperspective of developing a healthyorganization that excels both overthe short term and the long term.But this accounting standards debateis not likely <strong>to</strong> be resolved withoutcollaborative research betweenaccountants and marketers.Nonetheless, it is important that <strong>to</strong>pmanagement be willing <strong>to</strong> pay forcertain marketing activities overmultiple periods, and not expectevery marketing undertaking <strong>to</strong> havepositive short-term results. Inparticular, it is important <strong>to</strong>recognize that some marketingactivities are focused on buildingmarket-based assets where theoutcomes have strategic value (e.g.,building a new channel, investing inbrand development, or cus<strong>to</strong>meracquisition). Other activities arefocused on “maintenance marketing”or where one might leveragemarket-based assets <strong>to</strong> enhanceshort-term performance (e.g., pricepromotionsthat leverage brandequity <strong>to</strong> extract value for thecompany). To accomplish this, it isessential we have measures not jus<strong>to</strong>f short–term consequences asderived from marketing mix modelsbut also the long-term effects.Analogous <strong>to</strong> when a companyinvests in a plant, there is a tangibleasset which appears on the books forwhich there is a known depreciationschedule.While current accounting practicesneither permit us <strong>to</strong> show the longtermeffects nor depreciatemarketing expenditures, there is noreason why we should not have suchlong-term measures and recognizethese metrics as fundamental assetsof the firm. Thus, in order <strong>to</strong>highlight marketing’s invaluablecontribution <strong>to</strong>wards the long termhealth of a company, it is imperativethat we clearly understand howmarketing activities at an individualcampaign level link <strong>to</strong> (i) thefinancial consequences that are theconcern of accounting and financedepartments, and (ii) the intangibleassets that are the concern of theCEO and board of direc<strong>to</strong>rsmanaging the ultimate strategicdirection for the organization.2. Existing frameworks that linkmarketing <strong>to</strong> firm performance2.1 A traditional industry perspective– the DuPont ModelSince its humble beginnings in 1919,the DuPont model has come a longZyman Institute of Brand Science 6