Unabomber Manifesto - ouroboros ponderosa

they were getting it back in increased sales. One member of FC met a salesmanager a couple of years ago who was frank enough to tell him, "Our job isto make people buy things they don't want and don't need." He thendescribed how an untrained novice could present people with the factsabout a product, and make no sales at all, while a trained and experiencedprofessional salesman would make lots of sales to the same people. Thisshows that people are manipulated into buying things they don't really want.12. The problem of purposelessness seems to have become less seriousduring the last 15 years or so, because people now feel less securephysically and economically than they did earlier, and the need for securityprovides them with a goal. But purposelessness has been replaced byfrustration over the difficulty of attaining security. We emphasize the problemof purposelessness because the liberals and leftists would wish to solve oursocial problems by having society guarantee everyone's security; but if thatcould be done it would only bring back the problem of purposelessness. Thereal issue is not whether society provides well or poorly for people's security;the trouble is that people are dependent on the system for their securityrather than having it in their own hands. This, by the way, is part of thereason why some people get worked up about the right to bear arms;possession of a gun puts that aspect of their security in their own hands.13. Conservatives' efforts to decrease the amount of governmentregulation are of little benefit to the average man. For one thing, only afraction of the regulations can be eliminated because most regulations arenecessary. For another thing, most of the deregulation affects businessrather than the average individual, so that its main effect is to take powerfrom the government and give it to private corporations. What this means forthe average man is that government interference in his life is replaced byinterference from big corporations, which may be permitted, for example, todump more chemicals that get into his water supply and give him cancer.The conservatives are just taking the average man for a sucker, exploitinghis resentment of Big Government to promote the power of Big Business.14. When someone approves of the purpose for which propaganda isbeing used in a given case, he generally calls it "education" or applies to itsome similar euphemism. But propaganda is propaganda regardless of thepurpose for which it is used.15. We are not expressing approval or disapproval of the Panamainvasion. We only use it to illustrate a point.16. When the American colonies were under British rule there were fewerand less effective legal guarantees of freedom than there were after theAmerican Constitution went into effect, yet there was more personalfreedom in pre-industrial America, both before and after the War ofIndependence, than there was after the Industrial Revolution took hold inthis country. We quote from Violence in America: Historical and ComparativePerspectives, edited by Hugh Davis Graham and Ted Robert Gurr, Chapter12 by Roger Lane, pages 476-478:"The progressive heightening of standards of property, and with itthe increasing reliance on official law enforcement (in 19th centuryAmerica). . .were common to the whole society. . .[T]he change insocial behavior is so long term and so widespread as to suggest aif a person is "inferior" it is not his fault, but society's, because he hasnot been brought up properly.19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings ofinferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, aruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith inhimself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but hecan still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, andhis efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior.[1]But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings of inferiority are soingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strongand valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strongonly as a member of a large organization or a mass movement withwhich he identifies himself.20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protestby lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police orracists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, butmany leftists use them not as a means to an end but because theyprefer masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait.21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassionor by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for theleftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principlecannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is tooprominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power.Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be ofbenefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. Forexample, if one believes that affirmative action is good for blackpeople, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile ordogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take adiplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbaland symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmativeaction discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not takesuch an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs.Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problemsserve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility andfrustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm blackpeople, because the activists' hostile attitude toward the whitemajority tends to intensify race hatred.22. If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists would haveto invent problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse formaking a fuss.23. We emphasize that the foregoing does not pretend to be anaccurate description of everyone who might be considered a leftist. Itis only a rough indication of a general tendency of leftism.