12.07.2015 Views

Physicochemical Characterization, Chlorination and ... - IJGHC

Physicochemical Characterization, Chlorination and ... - IJGHC

Physicochemical Characterization, Chlorination and ... - IJGHC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Physicochemical</strong>...Andzi et al.All the results are deposited in the Table 8. To illustrate these results, Figures 2, 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 presents,respectively, the appearance time of the plop, the residual turbidity <strong>and</strong> the yields of the reduction ofthe turbidity according to the dose of coagulant.ParametersTable-8: Jar Test ResultsRawWaterWaters of River Djoué (Sample)Water treated by sulfate of Aluminum <strong>and</strong> LimeNumber of Becher 0 1 2 3 4 5 6Dose of Sulfate of aluminum(mg/L)0 5 10 15 20 25 25Dose of lime (mg/L) 0 5 5 10 10 10 10pH 7,5 6,87 6,76 7,04 6,62 6,57 6,57T°C 20 20 20 20 20 20 20Turbidity 15 10 6,28 5,01 1,12 2,07 2,07Color 7,5 8 2,5 1,25 0 0 0Time of appearance of plop (mn,s)Yield of eliminat° of Turbidity(%)3’ 2’17’’2’ 1’20’’ 2’25’' 2’25’33,33 58,13 15 92,53 86,20 86,20It appears (Figure-2) that the appearance time of the plop evolves in two phases. In the first phase,the appearance time of plop decreases with the increase of the coagulant dose. In the second phase itsdecrease with the increase of coagulant dose. The minimal time of appearance of the plop is obtainedafter 80 seconds (1min 20s) in pH = 6.62. The doses of sulfate of aluminum <strong>and</strong> lime are respectively20 mg/L <strong>and</strong> 10 mg/L.Figure-2: Time of Appearance of the Plop according to the Dose of Coagulant (mg/L)625 <strong>IJGHC</strong>; June – August 2013, Vol.2, No.3, 618-630.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!