draft manuscript - University of California, Berkeley

More documents

Recommendations

Info

List of Figures1 Indigenous Groups of Maynas, 1638-1768 (Grohs 1974) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi2 Early Locations of the Omagua, Kokama, Kokamilla, Yurimagua and Aisuari . . . . xii2.1 Old Omagua Vowels (Phonemic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6v
AcknowledgmentsOur greatest thanks go to the speakers of Omagua with whom we have collaborated in the documentationand description of their language: Lazarina Cabudivo Tuisima, Manuel Cabudivo Tuisima(†2010), Amelia Huanaquiri Tuisima, Arnaldo Huanaquiri Tuisima, Alicia Huanío Cabudivo, andLino Huanío Cabudivo. We owe an important debt to Catherine Clark and Edinson Huamancayo,who carried out exploratory fieldwork in 2003 and 2004, respectively, under the direction of LevMichael and Christine Beier, with funding from Cabeceras Aid Project. We also thank our colleaguesin the ongoing documentation and description of Omagua: Clare Sandy, Tammy Stark andVivian Wauters. The current phase of the Omagua documentation project began in 2009 with thedigitization, parsing and grammatical analysis of an ∼100,000-word text corpus, in which MarcJanuta and Teresa McFarland also played essential roles. Field-based documentation was carriedout in 2010 and 2011 with funding from the National Science Foundation’s Documenting EndangeredLanguages program (award #0966499 Collaborative Research: Kokama-Kokamilla (cod) andOmagua (omg): Documentation, Description and (Non-)Genetic Relationships). We also wish tothank our colleagues in the ongoing Comparative Tupí-Guaraní Project at the University of California,Berkeley, whose work has provided important insights into the linguistic history of Omagua:Keith Bartolomei, Natalia Chousou-Polydouri, Michael Roberts and Vivian Wauters. Finally, wewish to thank Rosa Vallejos Yopán, whose work on Kokama-Kokamilla, Omagua’s sister language,has been critical for interpreting key aspects of the Old Omagua materials we discuss in this work.vi
Page 1: A Linguistic Analysis of Old Omagua
Page 5: List of Tables1 Morphemes and Abbre
Page 10 and 11: verid Veridical =semaiTable 2: Morp
Page 12 and 13: Figure 1: Indigenous Groups of Mayn
Page 14 and 15: Chapter 1IntroductionEcclesiastical
Page 16 and 17: such as Günter Tessmann (1930:47-6
Page 18 and 19: Chapter 2Grammatical Sketch of Old
Page 20 and 21: synchronic I, namely greater confus
Page 22 and 23: Table 2.3: Old Omagua Free Pronouns
Page 24 and 25: ‘Of these three people, which bec
Page 26 and 27: ene putaRi2sg desire(?)=kate=locten
Page 28 and 29: 2.2.3.1 Tense-Aspect-Mood2.2.3.1.1
Page 30 and 31: locative *=aRi (O’Hagan 2011:89-9
Page 32 and 33: 2.2.3.1.4 Irrealis =mia Synchronica
Page 34 and 35: illustrated in (2.19) and (2.20) be
Page 36 and 37: Table 2.9: Verbs Nominalized with -
Page 38 and 39: However, constituents derived with
Page 40 and 41: Table 2.11: Modern Omagua Nouns and
Page 42 and 43: The latter function is illustrated
Page 44 and 45: Table 2.14: Modern Omagua Demonstra
Page 46 and 47: upa =katu yene= sawa =kai upai ayai
Page 48 and 49: clitic because it follows other mor
Page 50 and 51: Table 2.18: Old Omagua Interrogativ
Page 52 and 53: 2.3.6.2 Conjunction with Comitative
Page 54 and 55: 2.3.6.4 Exact Similative maiRamania
Page 56 and 57:
‘To Heaven, so that they may live
Page 58 and 59:
2.3.7.3.2 Temporal Overlap: Point =
Page 60 and 61:
Note that while both =kate and =pup
Page 62 and 63:
Historically, =sep1 appears to have
Page 64 and 65:
aikiaRa musap1R1ka persona =kana uy
Page 66 and 67:
(2.83) maRaitipa Dios muRa?maRaiwha
Page 68 and 69:
tanu= eu =mai ne= yume ikume tanu=
Page 70 and 71:
The phonemic representation of Old
Page 72 and 73:
Table 3.3: Scribal Errors in the Co
Page 74 and 75:
la dirección de varios de dichos m
Page 76 and 77:
accurate, although there are certai
Page 78 and 79:
(4.4) a. Tanu eocmai neyume icume t
Page 80 and 81:
Chapter 5Catechism Fragment5.1 Bibl
Page 82 and 83:
5.1.3 Cabral (1995)Cabral’s (1995
Page 84 and 85:
(5.3) a. i. Marepupe tipa, Dios yag
Page 86 and 87:
(5.7) a. i. Mareiqua tipa Dios yagu
Page 88 and 89:
(5.10) a. i. Aiquiara musa puereca
Page 90 and 91:
Chapter 6Full Catechism6.1 Bibliogr
Page 92 and 93:
(Uriarte [1776]1986:602-607), which
Page 94 and 95:
aw1R1ka 178 Dios amitihow.many God
Page 96 and 97:
yene= ikua =senuni Dios =semai se y
Page 98 and 99:
close: ‘The son of God transforme
Page 100 and 101:
close: ‘The son of God transforme
Page 102 and 103:
(6.18) a. i. Jesu Xto. umanuraschi
Page 104 and 105:
ayaise cristiano =kana upai auca 20
Page 106 and 107:
. i. Vyahuere upa yenneca (entre l
Page 108 and 109:
(6.27) a. i. Mua quaraschi pupe mac
Page 110 and 111:
y lo segundo, guardar los diez Mand
Page 112 and 113:
close: ‘They will encounter [it].
Page 114 and 115:
ne= sapiaRi =tipa aikiaRa upa =katu
Page 116 and 117:
ne= yam1m1a =tipa upa =katu ne= ĩy
Page 118 and 119:
(7.2) a. Enesemai tasaschita upacat
Page 120 and 121:
Chapter 8Omagua Passages in Uriarte
Page 122 and 123:
‘Portuguese, to the church!’ori
Page 124 and 125:
Roaya epeka 275 -ta =RaSi pantaleó
Page 126 and 127:
The above example is the only attes
Page 128 and 129:
c. yenepatiRik1Ra, yume uku.yene= p
Page 130 and 131:
Chapter 9Historical Context of Old
Page 132 and 133:
military force quelled the revolt,
Page 134 and 135:
Table 9.1: Jesuit Missionaries Amon
Page 136 and 137:
the missionary or on the use of res
Page 138 and 139:
...él en persona les enseñaba la
Page 140 and 141:
varias veces en la latina. Los verb
Page 142 and 143:
9.2.3 Practical Language Learning a
Page 144 and 145:
and explicitly advises the training
Page 146 and 147:
The first version of an ecclesiasti
Page 148 and 149:
(9.2) tuyuka RitamatuyukalandRitama
Page 150 and 151:
tanu= papa 1wati Ritama =kate yuRit
Page 152 and 153:
the Full Catechism, and (9.15) from
Page 154 and 155:
A somewhat different process of sem
Page 156 and 157:
‘Teach me, does God exist?’b. a
Page 158 and 159:
Another difference between the ques
Page 160 and 161:
‘God is none of these things. The
Page 162 and 163:
‘So that he may truly know God, s
Page 164 and 165:
clitic =tipa, whereas the correspon
Page 166 and 167:
9.5 Text HistoryThe goal of this se
Page 168 and 169:
1690s, and possibly added to or mod
Page 170 and 171:
Chapter 10ConclusionOn the basis of
Page 172 and 173:
BibliographyAdelung, Johann Christo
Page 174 and 175:
de la Cruz, Laureano. [1653]1900. N
Page 176 and 177:
González Suárez, Federico. 1904.
Page 178 and 179:
Mikkelsen, Line H. 2005. Copular Cl
Page 180 and 181:
Uriarte, Manuel J. [1754]1942. Cart
show all

draft manuscript - University of California, Berkeley

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?