12.07.2015 Views

Why use multiple-choice questions on accounting - Bryant

Why use multiple-choice questions on accounting - Bryant

Why use multiple-choice questions on accounting - Bryant

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Why</str<strong>on</strong>g> Use Multiple Choice Questi<strong>on</strong>s 45Ingram, R. W., and T. P. Howard. 1998. The Associati<strong>on</strong> Between Course Objectives and GradingMethods in Introductory Accounting Courses. Issues in Accounting Educati<strong>on</strong> (Vol. 13, No. 4)815-832.Jacks<strong>on</strong>, R. E. 2006. Post Graduate Educati<strong>on</strong>al Requirements and Entry into the CPA Professi<strong>on</strong>.Journal of Labor Research (Vol. 27, No. 1) 101-114.Katz, I. R., R. E. Bennett, and A. E. Berger. 2000. Effects of Resp<strong>on</strong>se Format <strong>on</strong> Difficulty of SATMathematics Items: It's Not the Strategy. Journal of Educati<strong>on</strong>al Measurement (Vol. 37) 39-57.Kennedy, P. E., and W. B. Walstad. 1997. Combining Multiple-Choice and C<strong>on</strong>structed-Resp<strong>on</strong>seTest Scores: An Ec<strong>on</strong>omist’s View. Applied Measurement in Educati<strong>on</strong> (Vol. 10) 359-75.Kuechler, W. L., and M. G. Simkin. 2003. How Well Do Multiple-Choice Tests Evaluate StudentUnderstanding in Computer Programming Classes? Journal of Informati<strong>on</strong> Systems Educati<strong>on</strong>(Vol. 14, No. 4) 389-400.Lukhele, R., D. Thissen, and H. Wainer. 1994. On the Relative Value of Multiple-Choice,C<strong>on</strong>structed Resp<strong>on</strong>se, and Examinee-Selected Items <strong>on</strong> Two Achievement Tests. Journal ofEducati<strong>on</strong>al Measurement (Vol. 31, No. 3) 234-250.Lumsden, K. G., A. Scott, and A. Becker. 1987. The Ec<strong>on</strong>omics Student Reexamined: Male-FemaleDifferences in Comprehensi<strong>on</strong>. Journal of Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Educati<strong>on</strong> (Vol. 18, No.4)365 - 375._______, and _______. 1995. Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Performance <strong>on</strong> Multiple Choice and Essay Examinati<strong>on</strong>s:A Large-Scale Study of Accounting Students. Accounting Educati<strong>on</strong>: An Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal(Vol. 4) 153-167.Martinez, M. E. 1999. Cogniti<strong>on</strong> and the Questi<strong>on</strong> of Test-Item Format. Educati<strong>on</strong>al Psychologist(Vol. 34) 207-218.Messick, S. 1993. Trait Equivalence as C<strong>on</strong>struct Validity of Score Interpretati<strong>on</strong> Across MultipleMethods of Measurement. In Bennett, R. E., and W. C. Ward. C<strong>on</strong>struct Versus Choice inCognitive Measurement. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum) 61-73.Nunnally, J., and I. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric Theory. (New York, McGraw Hill).Puliyenthuruthel, J. 2005. How Google Searches-for Talent. Business Week Issue (April 11) 52.Rogers, W. T., and D. Harley. 1999. An Empirical Comparis<strong>on</strong> of Three- and Four-Choice Itemsand Tests: Susceptibility to Testwiseness and Internal C<strong>on</strong>sistency Reliability. Educati<strong>on</strong>al andPsychological Measurement (Vol. 59) 234-247.Rothkopf, M. 1987. No More Essay Questi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the Uniform CPA Examinati<strong>on</strong>. AccountingHoriz<strong>on</strong>s (Vol. 1, No. 4) 79-85.Shaftel, J., and T. L. Shaftel. 2007. Educati<strong>on</strong>al Assessment and the AACSB. Issues in AccountingEducati<strong>on</strong> (Vol. 22, No. 2) 215-232.Simkin, M. G., and W. L. Kuechler. 2005. Multiple-Choice Tests and Student Understanding: Whatis the C<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>? Decisi<strong>on</strong> Sciences Journal of Innovative Educati<strong>on</strong> (Vol. 3) 73-97.Snyder, A. 2003. The New CPA Exam-Meeting Today’s Challenges. Journal of Accountancy(Vol. 196, No. 6) 11-12.Summerfield, B. 2008. GIAC. The Hands-On Security Certificati<strong>on</strong>. Certificati<strong>on</strong> Magazine (Vol.10, No. 6) 24-25.Traub, R. E. 1993. On the Equivalence of the Traits Assessed by Multiple-Choice and C<strong>on</strong>structed-Resp<strong>on</strong>se Tests. In C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> Versus Choice in Cognitive Measurement, edited by Bennett,R. E. and W.C. Ward. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum) 29-44.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!