02.12.2012 Views

evaluation of the study visit - Mekong River Commission

evaluation of the study visit - Mekong River Commission

evaluation of the study visit - Mekong River Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MRC Study Visit to <strong>the</strong> Danube <strong>River</strong> Basin 2012<br />

4.1.1 Presentations and experts<br />

The excursion to <strong>the</strong> national park started with a presentation on <strong>the</strong> EU Water Framework Directive<br />

(WFD). Presentations where given by Fresh-Thoughts staff covering <strong>the</strong> following aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

WFD:<br />

� General Principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> water Framework Directive<br />

o Overall Objectives<br />

o Main Principles<br />

o <strong>River</strong> Basin Management Approach<br />

o Common Implementation Strategy<br />

� Implementation Process<br />

o Timeline<br />

o Planning Process<br />

o WFD requirements<br />

o Water Pricing<br />

� Lessons learned – 10 years later implementation experiences<br />

The presentation was <strong>the</strong>n followed by a contribution on managing large river basins towards<br />

integration and joint aims, comparing <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mekong</strong> and Danube. The presentation covered <strong>the</strong><br />

following aspects<br />

� Role <strong>of</strong> international <strong>River</strong> Basin Management<br />

� Comparison <strong>Mekong</strong> and Danube <strong>River</strong> Basins<br />

� Basic facts and figures<br />

� Management frameworks in <strong>River</strong> Basins<br />

� Significant Water Management Issues<br />

� Difference in RBM between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mekong</strong> and Danube Basin<br />

� Examples <strong>of</strong> good transboundary cooperation<br />

4.1.2 Summary<br />

The WFD commits <strong>the</strong> European Union Member States to achieve good qualitative and quantitative<br />

status <strong>of</strong> all water bodies (including marine waters up to one nautical mile from shore) by 2015. It is a<br />

framework in <strong>the</strong> sense that it prescribes steps to reach common goals ra<strong>the</strong>r than adopting <strong>the</strong><br />

more traditional limit value approach. Thus, to achieve 'good surface water status' both <strong>the</strong><br />

ecological status and <strong>the</strong> chemical status <strong>of</strong> a surface water body need to be at least 'good'.<br />

Ecological status refers to <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure and functioning <strong>of</strong> aquatic ecosystems <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

surface waters and is defined locally as being lower than a <strong>the</strong>oretical reference point <strong>of</strong> pristine<br />

conditions, i.e. in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic influence.<br />

The WFD requires <strong>River</strong> Management Plans covering a six year planning cycles. Draft <strong>River</strong> Basin<br />

Management Plans have to be published for public consultation. Article 14 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> WFD requires<br />

Member States "to encourage <strong>the</strong> active involvement <strong>of</strong> interested parties" in <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

it.<br />

The implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> WFD raised and raises a number <strong>of</strong> shared technical challenges for <strong>the</strong> EU<br />

Member States, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>, stakeholders and NGOs. In addition, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European river<br />

[3]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!