Mekelle University The School of Graduate Studies Faculty of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Means ComparisonsDif=Mean[i]-Mean[j] 15/1wo 35/1wo 55/1wo 25/1wo 15/1w 25/1w 45/1w 35/1w 55/1w 45/1wo15/1wo 0.0000 0.4267 0.6967 1.0067 1.0967 1.3633 1.6567 1.7000 1.8633 2.083335/1wo -0.4267 0.0000 0.2700 0.5800 0.6700 0.9367 1.2300 1.2733 1.4367 1.656755/1wo -0.6967 -0.2700 0.0000 0.3100 0.4000 0.6667 0.9600 1.0033 1.1667 1.386725/1wo -1.0067 -0.5800 -0.3100 0.0000 0.0900 0.3567 0.6500 0.6933 0.8567 1.076715/1w -1.0967 -0.6700 -0.4000 -0.0900 0.0000 0.2667 0.5600 0.6033 0.7667 0.986725/1w -1.3633 -0.9367 -0.6667 -0.3567 -0.2667 0.0000 0.2933 0.3367 0.5000 0.720045/1w -1.6567 -1.2300 -0.9600 -0.6500 -0.5600 -0.2933 0.0000 0.0433 0.2067 0.426735/1w -1.7000 -1.2733 -1.0033 -0.6933 -0.6033 -0.3367 -0.0433 0.0000 0.1633 0.383355/1w -1.8633 -1.4367 -1.1667 -0.8567 -0.7667 -0.5000 -0.2067 -0.1633 0.0000 0.220045/1wo -2.0833 -1.6567 -1.3867 -1.0767 -0.9867 -0.7200 -0.4267 -0.3833 -0.2200 0.0000Alpha=0.05Comparisons for all pairs using Tukey-Kramer HSDq* Alpha3.54110 0.05Abs(Dif)-LSD 15/1wo 35/1wo 55/1wo 25/1wo 15/1w 25/1w 45/1w 35/1w 55/1w 45/1wo15/1wo -3.0653 -2.6387 -2.3687 -2.0587 -1.9687 -1.7020 -1.4087 -1.3653 -1.2020 -0.982035/1wo -2.6387 -3.0653 -2.7953 -2.4853 -2.3953 -2.1287 -1.8353 -1.7920 -1.6287 -1.408755/1wo -2.3687 -2.7953 -3.0653 -2.7553 -2.6653 -2.3987 -2.1053 -2.0620 -1.8987 -1.678725/1wo -2.0587 -2.4853 -2.7553 -3.0653 -2.9753 -2.7087 -2.4153 -2.3720 -2.2087 -1.988715/1w -1.9687 -2.3953 -2.6653 -2.9753 -3.0653 -2.7987 -2.5053 -2.4620 -2.2987 -2.078725/1w -1.7020 -2.1287 -2.3987 -2.7087 -2.7987 -3.0653 -2.7720 -2.7287 -2.5653 -2.345345/1w -1.4087 -1.8353 -2.1053 -2.4153 -2.5053 -2.7720 -3.0653 -3.0220 -2.8587 -2.638735/1w -1.3653 -1.7920 -2.0620 -2.3720 -2.4620 -2.7287 -3.0220 -3.0653 -2.9020 -2.682055/1w -1.2020 -1.6287 -1.8987 -2.2087 -2.2987 -2.5653 -2.8587 -2.9020 -3.0653 -2.845345/1wo -0.9820 -1.4087 -1.6787 -1.9887 -2.0787 -2.3453 -2.6387 -2.6820 -2.8453 -3.0653Positive values show pairs of means that are significantly different.LevelMean15/1wo A 2.573333335/1wo A 2.146666755/1wo A 1.876666725/1wo A 1.566666715/1w A 1.476666725/1w A 1.210000045/1w A 0.916666735/1w A 0.873333355/1w A 0.710000045/1wo A 0.4900000Levels not connected by same letter are significantly different98
5: Summary of number of Earthworm found in the Bins.C/N ratioNumber of Eisenia foetidaAdults Juveniles TotalInitial After 70 days Initial After 70 days15/1w* 60 0 0 0 025/1w* 60 830 0 1360 219035/1w* 60 220 0 430 65045/1w* 60 330 0 580 91055/1w* 60 380 0 640 1020w* = with earthworm99
Page 1 and 2:
Mekelle UniversityThe School of Gra
Page 3 and 4:
AbstractVermicomposting is the proc
Page 5 and 6:
AcronymsANRS-----------------------
Page 7 and 8:
4.2 DISCUSSIONS ...................
Page 9 and 10:
Chapter 1: Introduction1.1 Backgrou
Page 11 and 12:
ConclusionUSCIRF has and will conti
Page 13 and 14:
Introduction of earthworms to areas
Page 15 and 16:
1.4 General objectiveThe objective
Page 17 and 18:
segments of sexually mature individ
Page 19 and 20:
scab fungus, spores of which are tr
Page 21 and 22:
compaction caused by agricultural t
Page 23 and 24:
2.6 Palatability of the Substrata t
Page 25 and 26:
circumstances. As Eisenia foetida t
Page 27 and 28:
the field. Lumbricus terrestris is
Page 29 and 30:
earthworms were added to soil made
Page 31 and 32:
2.14 Production of Earthworm CastsA
Page 33 and 34:
sand, respectively (Borowski, 1995)
Page 35 and 36:
A recent study found that earthworm
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3: Materials and Methods3.1
Page 39 and 40:
exchangeable capacity using ammoniu
Page 41 and 42:
And the three ingredient equation f
Page 43 and 44:
The four-ingredient equation for mo
Page 45 and 46:
Without earthwormPredetermined mixW
Page 47 and 48: Chapter 4: Results and Discussions4
Page 49 and 50: Figure 2: Effects of C/N ratio on C
Page 51 and 52: Figure 4: Effects of C/N ratio on C
Page 53 and 54: 4.2 DiscussionsAddition of earthwor
Page 55 and 56: earthworm dead tissue, nitrogen exc
Page 57 and 58: esults were found by Ndegwa and Tho
Page 59 and 60: is bound in organic matter in a for
Page 61 and 62: Therefore, developing countries lik
Page 63 and 64: Bostrom, U. (1986). The effect of s
Page 65 and 66: Gerard, B.M. and R.K.M. Hay. (1979)
Page 67 and 68: Marinissen, J.C.Y. Dexter, A.R. (19
Page 69 and 70: Rao S, Subba Rao A, Takkar PN (1996
Page 71 and 72: Simek, M. and V. Pizl. (1989). The
Page 73 and 74: www.vermico.comYeates, G.W. (1981).
Page 75 and 76: 2: Calculated Mass of Ingredients u
Page 77 and 78: Ingredient % Moisture % Carbon % Ni
Page 79 and 80: Ingredient % Moisture % Carbon % Ni
Page 81 and 82: 4: Data analysis using JMP modelTab
Page 83 and 84: Table 2. Oneway Analysis of Organic
Page 85 and 86: Table 3. Oneway Analysis of Availab
Page 87 and 88: Table 4. Oneway Analysis of Total N
Page 89 and 90: Table 5. Oneway Analysis of CEC (cm
Page 91 and 92: Table 6. Oneway Analysis of Ex. Ca
Page 93 and 94: Table 7. Oneway Analysis of Ex. K (
Page 95 and 96: Table 8. Oneway Analysis of Ex. Mg
Page 97: Table 9. Oneway Analysis of Ex. Aci
show all

Mekelle University The School of Graduate Studies Faculty of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?