12.07.2015 Views

Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science - My Sehir

Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science - My Sehir

Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science - My Sehir

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SCHRÖDINGER’S GRAVE 133where he would become director and rema<strong>in</strong> until his retirement<strong>in</strong> 1955, when he returned to Austria.Generations <strong>of</strong> physics students equate quantum physicswith Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger’s wave equation, treat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> wave functionas a probability distribution. The amplitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wave functionat any po<strong>in</strong>t represents <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g an electron<strong>the</strong>re. The solution to Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger’s equation for an electron<strong>in</strong> some sort <strong>of</strong> potential well is an <strong>in</strong>evitable f<strong>in</strong>al examproblem <strong>in</strong> elementary quantum mechanics.Now suppose that you actually detect <strong>the</strong> electron with your<strong>in</strong>struments. There is no longer any uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty about its location.The act <strong>of</strong> observ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> electron is said to “collapse” <strong>the</strong>wave function to that po<strong>in</strong>t. To some scientists <strong>the</strong> collapse <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> wave function made it seem as if <strong>the</strong> conscious act <strong>of</strong> observationactually created <strong>the</strong> th<strong>in</strong>g observed, turn<strong>in</strong>g a fuzzyprobability function <strong>in</strong>to a th<strong>in</strong>g—even though Schröd<strong>in</strong>gerhimself had ridiculed this <strong>in</strong>terpretation.Everyone agreed that <strong>the</strong> Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger equation worked, and<strong>the</strong>re were millions <strong>of</strong> important calculations wait<strong>in</strong>g to be done.It was a time <strong>of</strong> great opportunity, translat<strong>in</strong>g classical descriptions<strong>of</strong> nature <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong> quantum physics—even if<strong>the</strong>re was some disagreement about how to expla<strong>in</strong> it. Whynot just agree that nature behaves as if reality depends on <strong>the</strong>conscious act <strong>of</strong> an observer and get on with it? Inevitablyhowever, scientists began to omit <strong>the</strong> phrase “as if” from <strong>the</strong>irdiscussions. Why bo<strong>the</strong>r, everyth<strong>in</strong>g was work<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>e?Some took it much far<strong>the</strong>r, argu<strong>in</strong>g that s<strong>in</strong>ce events on anatomic scale are affected by <strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong> observation, and s<strong>in</strong>ceeveryth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> universe is made <strong>of</strong> atoms, we should not besurprised to f<strong>in</strong>d our thoughts <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g events on <strong>the</strong> macroscopicscale <strong>in</strong> which our lives are lived. Those with a spiritualbent began talk<strong>in</strong>g about “universal consciousness.”This was a godsend for <strong>the</strong> paranormal community. It providedscientific cover for every New <strong>Age</strong> fantasy from telepathyto feng shui. New <strong>Age</strong> technobabble was spr<strong>in</strong>kled with “quantumnon-locality,” “entanglement,” and “collaps<strong>in</strong>g” wave functions.The CIA would spend millions on “remote view<strong>in</strong>g,” and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!