Soil Fertility - Texas A&M AgriLife

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Elemental Concenttrations in VariousAnimal Zn FeMannuresCu Mn S----------------------mg/kg------------------------Dairy 129 4430Beef 92 2582Poultry 602 2668Swine 5000 800Biosolids 1340 227836 195 377818 251 5026465 579 7661400 2000 -473 357 -
Typical Appllication Rates• Should always be determined by soil testing• Biosolids (Class A) – 1tto2T/A• Poultry litter – 2 to 3 T/A• Cattle/Dairy – 10 to 25 T/A
Page 5: Essential Elements Found to Limit P
Page 9 and 10: Grazingvs.HayMost of the nutrientsa
Page 11 and 12: FertilizerSelectionSppring rate (lb
Page 14 and 15: Effect of Soil pH onNutrient Recove
Page 16 and 17: ‣ Neutralizing ValueLimestonee Qu
Page 18 and 19: Effect of Nittrogen Rateon Yield an
Page 20 and 21: Retail Fertilizer Material Prices(J
Page 22 and 23: PhospphorusCharacteristicstis and d
Page 24: Injected - 6 inches Surface Applied
Page 27 and 28: Phosphorus FertilizerOrdinary super
Page 29 and 30: Potassium Deficiency- Stand ddeclin
Page 31 and 32: Sources ofNutrients• Selected Com
Page 33: Elemental Concenttrations in Variou
Page 37 and 38: Disadvantagees of Manures• Unwant
Page 39 and 40: Soil Amendment or SNAKE OIL?
Page 41 and 42: Types of SoilAmendments• Biologic
Page 43 and 44: Biological inoculaants and activato
Page 45 and 46: Mineral Nutrrient Sources• Bayflo
Page 47 and 48: WettingAgents• Basic H• Satural
Page 49 and 50: Research Comparing Soil Amendmentst
Page 51 and 52: Lilly, North Carolina, 1978orn Yiel
Page 53 and 54: Effects of Huumic Acid onTifton 85
Page 55 and 56: FertilizerProductsGrasshopper 30-10
Page 57 and 58: Advanntages• No advantages were f
Page 59 and 60: Traditional Soiil Amendments• Man
Page 61 and 62: Proceddure forTaking Sooil SamplesF
Page 63 and 64: Proceddure forTaking Sooil SamplesC
Page 65 and 66: http://soilcrop.tamu.edutamu
Page 67: Effect of P Rate onYield of Improve

Soil Fertility - Texas A&M AgriLife

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?