12.07.2015 Views

OECD Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Molecular Genetic Testing

OECD Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Molecular Genetic Testing

OECD Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Molecular Genetic Testing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What is theOrganization <strong>for</strong> Economic Cooperation and Development?(<strong>OECD</strong>)• Governmental Organization - established <strong>in</strong> 1961• Orig<strong>in</strong> traced to post-WWII Marshal Plan• 30 member countries + cooperative arrangements with 70+ others• Focus is to promote economic growth and f<strong>in</strong>ancial stability• Biotechnology and health care viewed as key sectors• <strong>Molecular</strong> genetic test<strong>in</strong>g viewed as important and evolv<strong>in</strong>g• Lack of an <strong>in</strong>ternational frameworkhttp://www.oecd.org


The Journey to Guidel<strong>in</strong>e DevelopmentFocus: <strong>Molecular</strong> genetic test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> medical (disease-related) conditions<strong>OECD</strong> GUIDELINEFOR QUALITY ASSURANCEiN MOLECULAR GENETICTESTING200020052007


<strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Assurance</strong> and Proficiency Test<strong>in</strong>g<strong>for</strong> <strong>Molecular</strong> <strong>Genetic</strong> Test<strong>in</strong>g(Evidence <strong>for</strong> Policy Development)Total:US:827 Responses226 Responses2005http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/12/34779945.pdf


Laboratory Practice Sett<strong>in</strong>gs(from the survey)12%20%8%4%4%16%20%22%38%56%IndependentPrivate HospitalPublic Hospialublic Non-HospitalsResearch60%50%40%30%20%10%0%AllLaboratoriesUSLaboratoriesSett<strong>in</strong>g% Labs<strong>in</strong> one or more sett<strong>in</strong>gs


SpecimensProcessedSpecimens Processed <strong>for</strong> Test<strong>in</strong>g(from the survey)1,600,0001,400,0001,200,0001,000,000800,000600,000400,000200,000874,6081,112,9881,401,536167,649205,860279,744AllLaboratoriesUSLaboratories02000 2001 2002Year


Cross-Border Flow of Samples(from the survey)In 2002Number of samples sent out of countryTotal: 18,000US: 5030Percentage of laboratories send<strong>in</strong>g samplesout of countryAll Countries: 67% (554 out of 827)US: 28% (63 out of 226)


<strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Assurance</strong> IndexIn<strong>for</strong>mation elementStandard operat<strong>in</strong>gProcedures developedStandard operat<strong>in</strong>gprocedures reviewed bydirectorLaboratory report isissuedReport is reviewed bydirectorTurnaround time data iscollected% Total comply<strong>in</strong>g(n=827)9482958481% US comply<strong>in</strong>g(n=226)8898969483


General elementsReport<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Quality</strong> Index% Total comply<strong>in</strong>g % US comply<strong>in</strong>gBasic ElementsTwo unique identifiers 100100Result 95 92Added SpecificityDate of Birth 88 100Reason <strong>for</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g 89 94Statement of limitations 78 79Director’s s signature 84 94Implications <strong>for</strong> other familymembersAlso Useful61 64Date of report 99 100Sample collection date 86 98Suggestion <strong>for</strong> further test<strong>in</strong>g 82 79


Variables associated with higher quality <strong>in</strong>dices• Standard Operat<strong>in</strong>g Procedures exist• Standard operat<strong>in</strong>g procedures are reviewed by director• Laboratory test result report is issued (written or electronic)• Laboratory test result report is reviewed by director• Offer<strong>in</strong>g of prenatal / pre-implantation test<strong>in</strong>g• Affiliation with a genetics unit• Licens<strong>in</strong>g and accreditation• Participation <strong>in</strong> proficiency test<strong>in</strong>g• Not primarily <strong>in</strong> a research sett<strong>in</strong>g• Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g data on turnaround time• Lab director has an MD or PhD• Lab director is certified• Lab director has <strong>for</strong>mal tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g• Lab technicians have a university degree• lab technicians have relevant tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g


Official Recognition of LaboratoriesAll countriesUSLicensed / Certified 49% 98%Accredited 54% 84%Barriers to Accreditation(one or more reasons given)All countriesn=362USn=23In process 8% 14%Cost too high 64% 54%Not required 46% 45%Other 28% 14%


Guidel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Assurance</strong><strong>in</strong> <strong>Molecular</strong> <strong>Genetic</strong> Test<strong>in</strong>g"Prior to <strong>for</strong>m acceptance by theUS and other countries of the <strong>OECD</strong>.there was a significant commentperiod and <strong>for</strong>mal discussion"http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/43/6/38839788.pdf


<strong>OECD</strong> <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Assurance</strong><strong>in</strong> <strong>Molecular</strong> <strong>Genetic</strong> Test<strong>in</strong>g• Promote m<strong>in</strong>imum standards• Facilitate mutual recognition of quality assurance frameworks• Strengthen <strong>in</strong>ternational co-operation to facilitate cross-borderflow of patient specimens <strong>for</strong> medically necessary test<strong>in</strong>g• Increase public confidence <strong>in</strong> the governance of moleculargenetic test<strong>in</strong>g


<strong>OECD</strong> <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Assurance</strong><strong>in</strong> <strong>Molecular</strong> <strong>Genetic</strong> Test<strong>in</strong>gComponents1. General pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and best practices2. <strong>Quality</strong> assurance systems3. Proficiency test<strong>in</strong>g4. <strong>Quality</strong> of result report<strong>in</strong>g5. Education and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g standards6. AnnotationsOrganization:Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples (1,2,3...): Primarily directed to governmentsBest Practices (i, ii, iii): Primarily directed to laboratories and other entities


General pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and best practicesA.2 - <strong>Molecular</strong> genetic test<strong>in</strong>g should be delivered with<strong>in</strong> the framework ofhealthcare.A.i - Regulatory/professional bodies should, as appropriate, review whether<strong>in</strong>struments available to manage a quality assurance frameworkrequire adaptation <strong>for</strong> molecular genetic test<strong>in</strong>gA.3 - All molecular genetic test<strong>in</strong>g services should be provided andpractices under a quality assurance frameworkA.iii - <strong>Molecular</strong> genetic test results should be reported back to thereferr<strong>in</strong>g health care professional to enable counsel<strong>in</strong>g andhealthcare decision mak<strong>in</strong>g


<strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Assurance</strong> Systems<strong>in</strong> <strong>Molecular</strong> <strong>Genetic</strong> Test<strong>in</strong>gB.1 - Governments and regulatory bodies should recognize thataccreditation of medical laboratories is an effective procedure<strong>for</strong> assur<strong>in</strong>g quality.B.i. - All laboratories report<strong>in</strong>g molecular genetic test<strong>in</strong>g results <strong>for</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ical care purposes should be accredited or hold anequivalent recognition. (additional clarification <strong>for</strong> roleof research laboratories)B.9 - Governments should encourage <strong>in</strong>ternational collaboration <strong>for</strong>the development and validation of molecular genetic tests.B.viii - Laboratories should cooperative (<strong>in</strong>ternationally) to collect,develop, verify and make available reference materials.


Proficiency Test<strong>in</strong>g:Monitor<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Quality</strong> of Laboratory Per<strong>for</strong>manceC.1 - The per<strong>for</strong>mance of laboratories offer<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical molecular genetictests should be measured.C.iii - Proficiency test<strong>in</strong>g schemes should be structured to assess allphases of the laboratory process, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g result report<strong>in</strong>g.C.4 - Accreditation or equivalent recognition should be the basis <strong>for</strong> the<strong>in</strong>ternational recognition of proficiency test<strong>in</strong>g scheme andproviders.C.v - Laboratories should participate <strong>in</strong> a proficiency test<strong>in</strong>g scheme <strong>for</strong>every test offered, when such schemes exist. When not available,they should participate <strong>in</strong> alternate methods.


<strong>Quality</strong> of Result Report<strong>in</strong>gD.1 - All laboratories should issue molecular genetic test<strong>in</strong>g results<strong>in</strong> the <strong>for</strong>m of a written and/or electronic report to thereferr<strong>in</strong>g health professionalD.i - Reports should communicate <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation effectively tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>toaccount that the recipient may not be a specialist.D.2 - Where reports are issued directly to patients, it should beencouraged that laboratories recommend consultationwith an appropriate health care professional.D.4 - The <strong>in</strong>terpretation of the result should be appropriate to the<strong>in</strong>dividual and cl<strong>in</strong>ical situation and based on objectiveevidence.


Education and Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gStandards <strong>for</strong> Laboratory PersonnelE.2 - Standards <strong>for</strong> laboratory accreditation or other equivalentrecognition should require that all molecular geneticspersonnel have a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of education, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, skills,and experience that ensures their competence.E.4 - Development of educational and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programmes should beencouraged where they do not exist.E.vi. Comparison of education and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g systems between jurisdictionsshould be facilitated as a means to establish equivalence.E.5 - Relevant government or professional authorities shouldrecognize medical genetics as a discipl<strong>in</strong>e compris<strong>in</strong>g both acl<strong>in</strong>ical and a laboratory specialty.


Next Step: Implementation<strong>OECD</strong> Perspective Each country charged to implement Follow up meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> two yearsUS Perspective Needs: Access to quality test<strong>in</strong>g, validation,and reference materials.Eurogentests Road show: <strong>OECD</strong> <strong>Guidel<strong>in</strong>es</strong>International Organization <strong>for</strong> Standardization (ISO) Workgroup 1 (<strong>Quality</strong> and Competency of MedicalLaboratories), Technical Committee 212 explor<strong>in</strong>grelevance


Promot<strong>in</strong>g Availability, Access, and <strong>Quality</strong>Potential Benefits to the US?1. Encourag<strong>in</strong>g development of a framework <strong>for</strong> mutual recognition <strong>Quality</strong> assurance and professional competence2. Promote options <strong>for</strong> proficiency test<strong>in</strong>g or alternate assessment3. Promote collaboration relevant to availability and accessto reference materials4. Enhance opportunities <strong>for</strong> collaboration <strong>for</strong> the developmentand validation of tests, particularly those <strong>for</strong> rare diseases5. Promote importance and role of research laboratories <strong>in</strong>work<strong>in</strong>g with the cl<strong>in</strong>ical sector


Questions?Thank You

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!