Postscript5PostscriptAccomplishmentsThe three ma<strong>in</strong> activities dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Sixth <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong> Field Trip received activeand productive participation of stakeholders from government agencies, civilsociety, academe, and professional organizations (See Box 10). By and large,<strong>the</strong> field trip succeeded at two broad and important levels. On one hand, EMI was ableto fur<strong>the</strong>r explore <strong>the</strong> possibilities of harness<strong>in</strong>g and streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g its partnership withlocal <strong>in</strong>stitutions, and on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, it was able to enhance stakeholders’ ownership of<strong>the</strong> <strong>DRMMP</strong> process. The latter was accomplished by actually <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g partners andstakeholders <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of MEGA-Plan and MEGA-Index, two of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>components of MEGA-Learn.The Sixth <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong>Field Trip concluded <strong>the</strong>preparatory phase of <strong>the</strong>3cd implementation <strong>in</strong><strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong>. It directedits efforts at validat<strong>in</strong>g,re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g and support<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> accomplishments made<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past two years. Takentoge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> activities from<strong>the</strong> six field trips contributedto <strong>the</strong> fulfillment of <strong>the</strong>IWPs identifed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>city’s <strong>DRMMP</strong> (See Box11). The most significantachievements of <strong>the</strong> 3cdProgram <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong>are those that are long-Box 10. Outcome of <strong>the</strong> 6th <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong> Field Trip Ma<strong>in</strong> Activities11-17 October 2006, <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong>, Philipp<strong>in</strong>esName of Activity1. Consultative Forum on <strong>the</strong> Consolidated <strong>Disaster</strong> RiskManagement BillMajor recommendations were recorded, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those of <strong>the</strong>Presidential Legal Liaison Offi ce which meets monthly to discussbills that can be certifi ed as urgent by <strong>the</strong> President. Consensuswas reached on areas for improvement and procedures to beobserved for <strong>the</strong> eventual enactment of <strong>the</strong> bill.2. Round-table Discussion on <strong>the</strong> Megacity IndicatorSystem (MEGA-Index)Suggestions on <strong>the</strong> tool’s application, adaptation and<strong>in</strong>stitutionalization <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong> were ga<strong>the</strong>red. Lessonswere learned from <strong>the</strong> experience of participants <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dicators.3. Validation Workshop on <strong>the</strong> Risk-Sensitive Land UsePlann<strong>in</strong>g eLearn<strong>in</strong>g Course (MEGA-Plan)Participants provided feedback on <strong>the</strong> contents and presentationof <strong>the</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g module and <strong>in</strong>dicated additional topics for reviewand consideration.Related IWPIWP No. 5IWP No. 1IWP No. 222
Enhanc<strong>in</strong>g Local Partnership and Stakeholders’ Ownershipterm and quantitavely non-measurable. These <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g of soundpratices with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions, improvement of <strong>in</strong>stitutional and governmence processes,enhancement of skills among professionals, and <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> awareness among a largeconstituency that <strong>in</strong>cludes policymakers, managers, professionals and <strong>the</strong> generalpublic.Box 11. Collective Accomplishments of <strong>the</strong> <strong>DRMMP</strong> Implementation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong>3cd Program, Phase 1 (2004-2006)IWP No. Description Accomplishment1 Develop and<strong>in</strong>stitutionalizetechnologies for riskcommunication andpreparedness2 Incorporate riskreduction criteria <strong>in</strong>land use and urbanplann<strong>in</strong>g3 Conduct tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gneeds assessmentand capacity build<strong>in</strong>gfor DRM4 Mobilize resourcesamong NGOs,professionalorganizations andprivate sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>DRM agenda5 Improve legaland <strong>in</strong>stitutionalarrangements forDRM delivery1.1. Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial platform of MEGA-Learn, consist<strong>in</strong>g of fourmegacity-specifi c tools, namely, MEGA-Know, MEGA-View, MEGA-Index andMEGA-Plan, with <strong>in</strong>puts from various FG members and local partners1.2. Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of more than 100 technical staff and specialists on MEGA-View, anddevelopment of a plan to transfer <strong>the</strong> technology to ei<strong>the</strong>r PHIVOLCS or MMDA1.3. Review and test<strong>in</strong>g of MEGA-Index <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong>, with <strong>the</strong>direct <strong>in</strong>volvement of FG members and local and national experts2.1. Development of MEGA-Plan, a web-based course on risk-sensitive land useplann<strong>in</strong>g, with <strong>in</strong>puts from FG2 members2.2. Conduct of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g workshops with urban and environmental planners fromvarious government agencies2.3. Review of <strong>the</strong> urban plann<strong>in</strong>g “cookbook” to <strong>in</strong>clude DRR parameters2.4. Awareness-build<strong>in</strong>g among planners on <strong>the</strong> role of DRR <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> practice of<strong>the</strong>ir profession, through <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous work of FG23.1. Identifi cation and evaluation of exist<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g events <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong>irrelevance to DRM and DRR <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong>3.2. Identifi cation of a target audience consist<strong>in</strong>g of planners and key offi cials fromMMDA and <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong> LGUs3.3. Launch<strong>in</strong>g and delivery of <strong>the</strong> World Bank Institute’s (WBI) Distance Learn<strong>in</strong>gProgram on DRM <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>in</strong> collaboration with NDCC3.4. Undertak<strong>in</strong>g of several participatory tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g workshops to enhance <strong>the</strong>knowledge and skills of key offi cials and staff <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> DRM4.1. Identifi cation of key civil society organizations <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metro</strong> <strong>Manila</strong>4.2. Development of <strong>the</strong> Terms of Reference for FG4, and conduct of <strong>in</strong>itialworkshop with representatives from professional organizations and NGOs4.3. Agreement with <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>e Institute of Civil Eng<strong>in</strong>eers (PICE) to holdtra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for professionals to improve understand<strong>in</strong>g and implementation of <strong>the</strong>Build<strong>in</strong>g Code4.4. Initial discussion with CNDR for a jo<strong>in</strong>t program <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> private sector5.1. Collation and review of legislation related to DRM <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, as wellas state-of-<strong>the</strong>-art legislation <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries5.2. Elaboration and consolidation of pend<strong>in</strong>g bills <strong>in</strong>to a comprehensive DRM billthrough <strong>the</strong> collective work of FG5 members under <strong>the</strong> leadership of NDCC/OCD5.3. Consultation with key stakeholders, LGUs and legislators to promote <strong>the</strong>proposed DRM bill5.4. Introduction of a section on DRM <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country’s MTPDP23