Bloodborne pathogens - Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Exposure control plan:Paragraph (c)(1)(v)• Methods for soliciting employee input in engineeringand work practice control evaluations may includeemployee involvement in:– joint labor-management safety committees (which are requiredin Minnesota workplaces with 25 or more employees);– problem-solving groups;– safety meetings and audits;– employee surveys;– worksite inspections;– exposure incident investigations;– written employee comments; and– pilot testing programs.
Exposure control plan:Paragraph (c)(1)(v)• An employer with multiple worksites may opt for the followingapproach, instead of individual site-separate engineering and workpractice control evaluations.(A) Conduct initial product evaluations at the corporate level by ateam that includes nonmanagerial employees involved in the carepractices that will be affected by the devices being evaluated.(B) The devices recommended by the corporate level evaluationteam can then be sent to other sites for implementation.(C) The employer should establish a procedure for employees at thesmaller worksites to report problems with a new device or to suggesta new device for evaluation.
Page 2 and 3: Why is a standard needed? OSHA esti
Page 4 and 5: OSHA’s bloodborne pathogens stand
Page 6 and 7: Some workers who are at risk Physic
Page 8 and 9: Because of the large number ofoccup
Page 10 and 11: Format of 29 CFR 1910.1030(a) Scope
Page 12 and 13: Scope and application:Paragraph (a)
Page 14 and 15: Definitions:Paragraph (b)• Paragr
Page 16 and 17: Definitions:Paragraph (b)“Bloodbo
Page 18 and 19: Definitions:Paragraph (b)“Deconta
Page 20 and 21: Definitions:Paragraph (b)• “Occ
Page 22 and 23: Definitions:Paragraph (b)• “Reg
Page 24 and 25: Definitions:Paragraph (b)• ”Nee
Page 26 and 27: Engineering controls:hypodermic syr
Page 28 and 29: Engineering controls:hypodermic syr
Page 30 and 31: Engineering controls:scalpels that
Page 32 and 33: Engineering controls:vascular acces
Page 34 and 35: Exposure control:Paragraph (c)‣ P
Page 36 and 37: Exposure control plan:Paragraph (c)
Page 38 and 39: Exposure control plan:Paragraph (c)
Page 42 and 43: Minnesota Statutes 182.6555• “R
Page 44 and 45: Exposure determination:Paragraph (c
Page 46 and 47: Univeral precautions:Paragraph (d)(
Page 48 and 49: Engineering controlsThese controls
Page 50 and 51: Engineering control examplesSafe me
Page 52 and 53: Engineering control examples‣ Mou
Page 54 and 55: Work practice controls‣ Wash hand
Page 56 and 57: Work practice controls‣ Immediate
Page 58 and 59: Work practice controlsFood and drin
Page 60 and 61: Work practice controls‣ Mouthpipe
Page 62 and 63: Personal protective equipment:Parag
Page 64 and 65: Personal protective equipment:glove
Page 66 and 67: Personal protective equipment:masks
Page 68 and 69: Personal protective equipment:gowns
Page 70 and 71: Housekeeping:decontamination• Wor
Page 72 and 73: Housekeeping:other issues• Protec
Page 74 and 75: Housekeeping:regulated waste• Reg
Page 76 and 77: Housekeeping:laundryContaminated la
Page 78 and 79: Hepatitis B vaccination and post-ex
Page 80 and 81: Hepatitis B vaccination:Paragraph (
Page 82 and 83: Hepatitis B vaccination:titer and a
Page 84 and 85: Hepatitis B vaccination:titer and a
Page 86 and 87: Hepatitis B vaccination:collateral
Page 88 and 89: Collateral duty first-aid providers
Page 90 and 91:
Post-exposure evaluation and follow
Page 92 and 93:
LabelsThe standard requires warning
Page 94 and 95:
Information and training:Paragraph
Page 96 and 97:
Training program elements:(H) an ex
Page 98 and 99:
Recordkeeping, medical records:Para
Page 100 and 101:
Bloodborne pathogens recordkeepinga
Page 102 and 103:
Recordkeeping, sharps injury log‣
Page 104 and 105:
Summary OSHA’s bloodborne pathoge
Page 106 and 107:
Information sourcesMinnesota Depart
Page 108 and 109:
Questions?
show all

Bloodborne pathogens - Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?