02.12.2012 Views

FILM ART AND FILMMAKING

FILM ART AND FILMMAKING

FILM ART AND FILMMAKING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

or35060_ch01.qxd 7/19/06 8:15 AM Page 36<br />

36 CHAPTER 1 Film as Art: Creativity, Technology, and Business<br />

gets a bit of the business. One film can even advertise another within its story<br />

(1.42). Although synergy sometimes fails, multimedia giants are in the best position<br />

to take advantage of it.<br />

Distributors arrange release dates, make prints, and launch advertising campaigns.<br />

For big companies, distribution can be efficient because the costs can be<br />

spread out over many units. One poster design can be used in several markets, and<br />

a distributor who orders a thousand prints from a laboratory will pay less per print<br />

than the filmmaker who orders one. Large companies are also in the best position<br />

to cope with the rise of distribution costs. Today, the average Hollywood film is<br />

estimated to cost around $64 million to make and an additional $35 million to<br />

distribute.<br />

The risky nature of mass-market filmmaking has led the majors to two distribution<br />

strategies: platforming and wide release. In the platforming strategy, the film<br />

opens first in a few big cities. It’s then gradually expanded to theaters around the<br />

country, though it may never play in every community. If the strategy is successful,<br />

anticipation for the film builds, and it remains a point of discussion for months. The<br />

major distributors tend to use platforming for unusual films, such as Munich and<br />

Brokeback Mountain, which need time to accumulate critical support and generate<br />

positive word-of-mouth. Smaller distributors use platforming out of necessity, since<br />

they can’t afford to make enough prints to open wide, but the gradual accumulation<br />

of buzz can work in their favor, too.<br />

In wide release, a film opens at the same time in many cities and towns. In the<br />

United States, this requires that thousands of prints be made, so wide release is<br />

available only to the deep-pocketed major distributors. Wide release is the typical<br />

strategy for mainstream films, with two or three new titles opening each weekend<br />

on 2000–4000 screens. A film in wide release may be a midbudget one—a comedy,<br />

an action picture, a horror or science fiction film, or a children’s animated movie.<br />

It may also be a very big-budget item, a tentpole picture like War of the Worlds or<br />

a Harry Potter installment.<br />

Distributors hope that a wide opening signals a “must-see” film, the latest big<br />

thing. Just as important, opening wide helps recoup costs faster, since the distributor<br />

gets a larger portion of box office receipts early in the run. But it’s a gamble. If<br />

a film fails in its first weekend, it almost never recovers momentum and can lose<br />

money very fast. Even successful films usually lose revenues by 40 percent or more<br />

every week they run. So when two high-budget films open wide the same weekend,<br />

the competition is harmful to all. Companies tend to plan their tentpole release<br />

1.42 In Lethal Weapon, as Murtaugh and Riggs leave a hot-dog<br />

stand, they pass in front of a movie theater advertising The Lost<br />

Boys, another Warner Bros. film (released four months after<br />

Lethal Weapon). The prominence of Pepsi-Cola in this shot is an<br />

example of product placement—featuring well-known brands in a<br />

film in exchange for payment or cross-promotional services.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!