Beginningaccount value7/1/2014Endingaccount value12/31/2014Expenses paidduring period*<strong>Annual</strong>izedexpense ratioClass A - actual return $1,000.00 $1,037.74 $3.03 .59%Class A - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,022.23 3.01 .59Class B - actual return 1,000.00 1,034.09 6.82 1.33Class B - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,018.50 6.77 1.33Class C - actual return 1,000.00 1,033.82 7.07 1.38Class C - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,018.25 7.02 1.38Class F-1 - actual return 1,000.00 1,037.87 3.34 .65Class F-1 - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,021.93 3.31 .65Class F-2 - actual return 1,000.00 1,038.86 1.95 .38Class F-2 - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,023.29 1.94 .38Class 529-A - actual return 1,000.00 1,037.72 3.49 .68Class 529-A - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,021.78 3.47 .68Class 529-B - actual return 1,000.00 1,033.71 7.48 1.46Class 529-B - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,017.85 7.43 1.46Class 529-C - actual return 1,000.00 1,033.35 7.43 1.45Class 529-C - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,017.90 7.37 1.45Class 529-E - actual return 1,000.00 1,036.46 4.77 .93Class 529-E - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,020.52 4.74 .93Class 529-F-1 - actual return 1,000.00 1,038.88 2.31 .45Class 529-F-1 - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,022.94 2.29 .45Class R-1 - actual return 1,000.00 1,034.28 7.08 1.38Class R-1 - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,018.25 7.02 1.38Class R-2 - actual return 1,000.00 1,033.99 6.87 1.34Class R-2 - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,018.45 6.82 1.34Class R-2E - actual return † 1,000.00 1,021.66 1.68 .49Class R-2E - assumed 5% return † 1,000.00 1,022.74 2.50 .49Class R-3 - actual return 1,000.00 1,036.48 4.77 .93Class R-3 - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,020.52 4.74 .93Class R-4 - actual return 1,000.00 1,037.92 3.29 .64Class R-4 - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,021.98 3.26 .64Class R-5 - actual return 1,000.00 1,039.37 1.75 .34Class R-5 - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,023.49 1.73 .34Class R-6 - actual return 1,000.00 1,039.67 1.49 .29Class R-6 - assumed 5% return 1,000.00 1,023.74 1.48 .29*The “expenses paid during period” are equal to the “annualized expense ratio,” multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by thenumber of days in the period, and divided by 365 (to reflect the one-half year period).† The period for the ”annualized expense ratio” and ”actual return” line is based on the number of days since the initial sale of the share class on August 29, 2014.The ”assumed 5% return” line is based on 184 days.Tax informationunauditedWe are required to advise you of the federal tax status of certain distributions received by shareholders during the fiscal year. The fundhereby designates the following amounts for the fund’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2014:Long-term capital gains $4,365,643,000Qualified dividend income 100%Corporate dividends received deduction $994,887,000U.S. government income that may be exempt from state taxation $68,054,000Individual shareholders should refer to their Form 1099 or other tax information, which was mailed in January 2015, to determine thecalendar year amounts to be included on their 2014 tax returns. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors.32 <strong>American</strong> <strong>Balanced</strong> <strong>Fund</strong>
Approval of Investment Advisory and Service AgreementThe <strong>American</strong> <strong>Balanced</strong> <strong>Fund</strong>‘s boardhas approved the fund’s InvestmentAdvisory and Service Agreement (the“agreement”) with Capital Researchand Management Company (“CRMC”)for an additional period throughJanuary 31, 2016. The agreement wasamended to add additional advisoryfee breakpoints if and when thefund’s net assets exceed $89 billion.The board approved the agreementfollowing the recommendation ofthe fund’s Contracts Committee (the“committee”), which is composedof all of the fund’s independentboard members. The board and thecommittee determined that the fund’sadvisory fee structure was fair andreasonable in relation to the servicesprovided, and that approving theagreement was in the best interestsof the fund and its shareholders.In reaching this decision, the boardand the committee took into accountinformation furnished to themthroughout the year and otherwiseprovided to them, as well as informationprepared specifically in connection withtheir review of the agreement, and wereadvised by their independent counsel.They considered the following factors,among others, but did not identifyany single issue or particular piece ofinformation that, in isolation, was thecontrolling factor, and each board andcommittee member did not necessarilyattribute the same weight to each factor.1. Nature, extent and quality of servicesThe board and the committee considered the depth and quality of CRMC’s investmentmanagement process, including its global research capabilities; the experience,capability and integrity of its senior management and other personnel; the low turnoverrates of its key personnel; the overall financial strength and stability of CRMC andthe Capital Group organization; and the ongoing evolution of CRMC’s organizationalstructure designed to maintain and strengthen these qualities. The board and thecommittee also considered the nature, extent and quality of administrative, complianceand shareholder services provided by CRMC to the fund under the agreement andother agreements, as well as the benefits to fund shareholders from investing in a fundthat is part of a large family of funds. The board and the committee concluded that thenature, extent and quality of the services provided by CRMC have benefited and shouldcontinue to benefit the fund and its shareholders.2. Investment resultsThe board and the committee considered the investment results of the fund in light ofits objectives of providing conservation of capital, current income and long-term growthof capital and income. They compared the fund’s investment results with those of otherrelevant funds (including funds that form the basis of the Lipper index for the categoryin which the fund is included), and data such as relevant market and fund indexes, overvarious periods through June 30, 2014. This report, including the letter to shareholdersand related disclosures, contains certain information about the fund’s investment results.The board and the committee reviewed the fund’s investment results measured againstvarious indexes, including the Lipper <strong>Balanced</strong> <strong>Fund</strong>s Index, the S&P 500 Index, theBarclays U.S. Aggregate Index and a customized index that is 60% S&P 500 Index and40% Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index (adjusted for <strong>Fund</strong> expenses). They noted that theinvestment results of the fund generally exceeded those of these indexes for the lifetime,20-year, 10-year and five-year periods, except for the S&P 500 Index. They also notedthat the volatility of the fund’s monthly returns for such periods was at or near that of theLipper <strong>Balanced</strong> <strong>Fund</strong>s Index and less than that of the S&P 500 Index. The board andthe committee concluded that the fund’s investment results have been satisfactory forrenewal of the agreement and that CRMC’s record in managing the fund indicated thatits continued management should benefit the fund and its shareholders.3. Advisory fees and total expensesThe board and the committee compared the advisory fees and total expense levels ofthe fund to those of other relevant funds. They observed that the fund’s advisory feesand expenses generally compared favorably to those of other similar funds includedin the Lipper <strong>Balanced</strong> <strong>Fund</strong>s category. The board and the committee also consideredthe breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure that reduce the level offees charged by CRMC to the fund as fund assets increase. In addition, they reviewedinformation regarding the effective advisory fees charged to non-mutual fund clientsby CRMC and its affiliates. They noted that, to the extent there were differencesbetween the advisory fees paid by the fund and the advisory fees paid by those clients,the differences appropriately reflected the investment, operational and regulatorydifferences between advising the fund and the other clients. The board and thecommittee concluded that the fund’s cost structure was fair and reasonable in relationto the services provided, and that the fund’s shareholders receive reasonable value inreturn for the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.<strong>American</strong> <strong>Balanced</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> 33