12.07.2015 Views

Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill, 2012 [B35 ... - Juta - Law

Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill, 2012 [B35 ... - Juta - Law

Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill, 2012 [B35 ... - Juta - Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

422.60 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> of section 107The proposed amendment clarifies that SARS may concede an appeal similarto its power to allow an objection under section 106(2), but limits SARS’sability to concede an appeal to before the appeal is heard by the tax court or ahigher court dealing with an appeal against the judgment of the tax court.2.61 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> of section 130<strong>Amendment</strong> consequential upon amendment to section 11. (See the notes toparagraph 2.39 above).2.62 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> of section 135The proposed amendment is a technical correction in order to clarify that thissection only applies to appeals against tax court judgments to the SupremeCourt of Appeal.2.63 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> of section 142The proposed amendment is a technical correction to align the Chapterdefinition of ‘settle’ with the definition of ‘dispute’ to clarify that a settlementmay be concluded at any time after the issue of an assessment or the makingof a ‘decision’ which is ‘disputed’, and not only after an appeal is lodged.2.64 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> of section 164The proposed amendment is a technical correction in order to enhance clarity.2.65 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> of section 166The proposed amendment is a technical correction to enable SARS to allocatea payment against an amount of interest or penalty before capital, particularlywhere payment is made in respect of a tax type where interest is not yetcalculated on a daily basis and compounded monthly under section 187(2).2.66 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> of section 187The proposed amendment is a technical correction to ensure the correctapplication of the interest regime under the <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011, i.e.if a penalty is not paid by the payment date specified in the penalty assessmentinterest runs from the liability date which is the date of assessment.2.67 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> of section 189The proposed amendment is a technical correction to delete a incorrectreference to a defined term.2.68 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> of section 192The definition of ‘asset’ has been moved to the general definitions insection 1.2.69 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> to Chapter 14The proposed amendment is consequential upon the deletion of the definitionof ‘asset’ in section 192.2.70 <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Act, 2011: <strong>Amendment</strong> of section 210The proposed amendments seek to avoid administrative ‘double jeopardy’ byproviding that a fixed amount administrative penalty may not be imposed fornon-compliance which is subject to a percentage based penalty, in respect of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!