12.07.2015 Views

Case Study - Alliance for Risk Assessment

Case Study - Alliance for Risk Assessment

Case Study - Alliance for Risk Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Log Concentration (µg/m 3 )22Total uncertainty factors (UF) of 30 (interspecies UF of 3, intraspecies UF of 10, database UF of1) was applied to the POD HEC to result in the proposed 24-hr AMCV of 0.0012 ppm (1.2 ppb)(TCEQ 2010).24-Hour AMCV DerivationAs discussed in the previous section, UFs are applied to the key study (Dorman et al. 2008)POD HEC to derive the 24-h value:POD HEC / (30) = 0.0374 ppm / 30 = 1.2 ppb or 2.7 µg/m 3This value falls between the TCEQ acute 1-h ReV of 4.8 ppb (11 µg/m 3 ) (TCEQ 2010) and thechronic noncarcinogenic ReV of 0.22 ppb (0.50 µg/m 3 ) (TCEQ 2010) (Figure 1-1).Figure 1-1 Comparison of Acrolein AMCVs developed to evaluate different averagingtimes100Acrolein101-hr AMCV11 µg/m 3 24-hr AMCV10.12.7 µg/m 3 Long-TermAMCV0.50 µg/m 30.011 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000Log Time (Hours)24-Hr Acrolein Canister Data Collected at Sites in Texas with Comparison ValuesThere are two sites in TX which collect 24-hr carbonyl canister samples of ambient airapproximately every sixth day, including acrolein. Those sites are located in Karnack (in EastTexas) and in Deer Park (near Houston). A comparison of the proposed 24-hr AMCV <strong>for</strong>acrolein to the improved (“verified”) acrolein 24-hr data was conducted. Verified acrolein dataare those data that have been collected and analyzed using USEPA’s improved acrolein analysismethodology. Concentrations of acrolein collected at the sites using the improved samplingmethod implemented in October 2011 have not exceeded the 24-hr AMCV (Figure 1-2, below).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!