Chlorophyll and suspended sediment assessment in a ... - OzCoasts

Figure 4-9. Sensitivity analysis for the proposed regional MODIS algorithm for theretrieval of CDOM for all concentrations of chlorophyll and TSM .................................... 67Figure 4-10. Comparison of chlorophyll estimates from MODIS/Aqua data using theCHL_Carder and MIM algorithms with the AIMS data. .................................................... 72Figure 4-11. Relative error of chlorophyll estimates from MODIS/Aqua data using theCHL_Carder and MIM algorithms with the AIMS data. Only the points common tothe two sets are plotted. ................................................................................................... 73Figure 5-1. Map of the log-transformed values (log_mean) for 2003 of the CHL retrievalby the MIM algorithm........................................................................................................ 77Figure 5-2. Map of the log-transformed values (log_mean) for the wet season coveringJanuary–April 2003 of the CHL retrieval by the MIM algorithm ....................................... 78Figure 5-3. Map of the log-transformed values (log_mean) for the dry season coveringMay–December 2003 of the CHL retrieval by the MIM algorithm .................................... 79Figure 5-4. Map of the log-transformed values (log_mean) for all 2003 of the TSM(as tripton) retrieval by the MIM algorithm........................................................................ 80Figure 5-5. Map of the log-transformed values (log_mean) for January–April 2003 ofthe TSM (as tripton) retrieval by the MIM algorithm......................................................... 81Figure 5-6. Map of the log-transformed values (log_mean) for May–December 2003of the TSM (as tripton) retrieval by the MIM algorithm..................................................... 82Figure 6-1. A two-dimensional view (looking down from above) of the three-dimensionalmodel grid used for the Fitzroy Estuary–Keppel Bay model ............................................ 85Figure 6-2. Comparison of the remote sensing products and model outputs for7 March 2004....................................................................................................................95Figure 6-3. Comparison of the remote sensing products and model outputs for14 March 2004.................................................................................................................. 96Figure 6-4. Comparison of the remote sensing products and model outputs for27 June 2004....................................................................................................................97Figure 6-5. Comparison of the remote sensing products and model outputs for24 July 2004 ..................................................................................................................... 98Figure 6-6. Comparison of the remote sensing products and model outputs for8 October 2004................................................................................................................. 99Figure 6-7. Comparison of the remote sensing products and model outputs for11 October 2004............................................................................................................. 100Figure 6-8. Comparison of the remote sensing products and model outputs for24 October 2004............................................................................................................. 101ix