13.07.2015 Views

the irrationality of sums of radicals via cogalois theory

the irrationality of sums of radicals via cogalois theory

the irrationality of sums of radicals via cogalois theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32 Toma Albu4 Some applications <strong>of</strong> Cogalois TheoryCogalois Theory has nice applications to elementary Field Arithmetic, to AlgebraicNumber Theory, to binomial ideals and Gröbner bases, etc. (see [1], [8]).Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m cannot be performed without involving <strong>the</strong> tools <strong>of</strong> CogaloisTheory.We present below four <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se applications, especially those answering <strong>the</strong>Problems 3.1 and 3.2 discussed in <strong>the</strong> previous section. Note that most <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se applications hold in a more general context.A1. Effective degree computation: For any r, n 1 , . . . , n r ∈ N ∗ , a 1 , . . . , a r ∈Q ∗ √n+, let i ai denote <strong>the</strong> positive real n i -th root <strong>of</strong> a i , 1 i r. Then[ Q ( √ n 1a 1 , . . . , nr√ a r ) : Q ] = | Q ∗ 〈 √ n 1a 1 , . . . , nr√ a r 〉/Q ∗ |.This follows immediately from <strong>the</strong> Kneser Criterion (Theorem 3.3). Indeed,<strong>the</strong> extension Q ( √ n 1a 1 , . . . , nr√ a r )/Q is clearly Q ∗ 〈 √ n 1a 1 , . . . , nr√ a r 〉 -Kneserbecause <strong>the</strong>re are no primitive p-th roots <strong>of</strong> unity, p 3, inside <strong>the</strong> subfieldQ ( √ n 1a 1 , . . . , √ n ra r ) <strong>of</strong> R.□A2. Finding effectively all intermediate fields: We are going to describeall <strong>the</strong> subfields <strong>of</strong> E := Q ( 4√ 12 , 6√ 108 ), that is, all <strong>the</strong> intermediate fields <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> extension E/Q. By Example 3.7 (A), <strong>the</strong> extension E/Q is G-Cogalois,so, by Theorem 3.5, I(E/Q) is easily described by L(Kne(E/Q)), whereKne(E/Q) = Q ∗ 〈 ̂4√ 12 , ̂6√ 108 〉/ Q ∗ and ̂x denotes for any x ∈ R ∗ its cosetxQ ∗ in <strong>the</strong> quotient group R ∗ /Q ∗ .A simple calculation shows that Kne(E/Q) is a cyclic group <strong>of</strong> order 12generated by ĉ, where c = 4√ 12 · 6√ 108 = 12√ 20, 155, 392. Consequently all itssubgroups are precisely:〈 ĉ 〉, 〈 ĉ2 〉, 〈 ĉ3 〉, 〈 ĉ4 〉, 〈 ĉ6 〉, 〈 ĉ12 〉.Thus, all <strong>the</strong> subfields <strong>of</strong> E are exactlyQ, Q(c), Q(c 2 ), Q(c 3 ), Q(c 4 ), Q(c 6 ),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!