28 tHE DRrlvk ouEstroN.Do the Licensing Justices in Ireland attend to thismost important branch of their duties ? I{ow oftendo we find licences to carry on this dangerous tradegir,en to persons utterly unfit for it ?Combination ol Trades ln a Licenseil House' Promotos Intemperance..Is it to the public advantage to have a combinatronof trades in a public house ? In England . no othergoods except eatables are allowed to be sold in thesame premises with intoxicants. In lreland, on thecontrary, it is not uncomrqon to find for sale, underthe samE roof with intoxicants, groceries of all kinds,hardware,_ soft goods. Thil system multiplies temptations,mrkes supervision difficult, and gives a clbakto drinking amDng women, who are sometimes suppliedwith drink under the title of groceries. On the whole,tle system militates against the cause of temperance.Have not the Licensing Justices, as an administrativebody, the power of taking some united uniform actionto save the country from this danger, without inflictingan injustice on the existing license holders ? Thediscontinuance of the system would quickly lead to adiminution of the number of public houses. Would'it not be well, too, if licences were altogether refusedto houses under a certain valuation, as at presentlicences are attached to some houses utterly unfit forthe business.Sunilay Closing.Consider the closing regulations. These have a mostimportant bearing on temperance reform. Take theSunday Closing Law. Tlrat this law has been, on thewho1e, a great boon to Ireland there can be no doubt;and few, if any, amongst the publicans themselves would,I venture to think. now ask for its repeal. Wherever thelaw is strictly enforced the results are excellent. Butis it strictly enforced ? I fear not, partly owing to theremissness of the police authorities and partly to theTHE DRINK oUESTrON. 29apathy and laxity oI the magistrates in punishingviolations of it. If No. 3 of the West Limerick resolutionswas universally adopted and acted on, andif a few vrotorious viola.tors of this law, in every townand village, were deprived of their licences, it wouldhave a most saiutary effect.Early Closing on Saturalay Night.Experience teaches that arrests {or drunkenness aremore numerous on Saturday nights than at any othertimes, and that the heaviest drinking takes place betweenro and rr o'clock.In Scotland the Licensing Authority has a discretionarypower since 1887 of early closing, except inseven large towns. They put it into effect, with suchbeneficial results, that the excluded torvns are agitatingto be included.The Licensing Authority in Ireland has not this discretionarypower; but if it had the power, say to makean order for early closing by any time up to two hours,to be renewed every year, and exercised it properly, itwould be productive of much good.Clubs anil Soltliers' Canteens.Two other sources of intenrperance in this country areclubs and soldiers' canteens. A well-regulated club,with its library, reading room, debates, and variousopportunities of intellectual improvement and innccentamusements, is a public boon. But a social club,with a drinking bar, is often a greater danger than anordinary public house. For the club is not under thesalne legal supervision and restrictive regulations,and hence it has all the temptations with fewer of thesafeguards. The consequence is that many personshave contracted habits of intemperance in these clubs,who would have escaped the ordinary snare of the publichouse. The evil of the drinking club is on the increasein Ireland, and is to be m:t with, it is to be feared,
l!tr--- ryr***-*-;H,--33otHp nnrrqk eubstroii.not only in the workingmen's clubs, but in ones withmore pretensions, whether County, Comtnercial orNational.It is in the interests of the members themselves ofthese clubs to see to the danger in time-to have themproperly conducted-and that none- but members besupplied with drink, and even these within the limitsgf moderation. Otherwise, public opinion will haveto be created against them, arid the legislature invokedto regulate them. I have been informed that it is not anuncommon thing to have civilians supplied with drinkfor payment on Sundays in soldieiri' canteens inGarrison towns. This is an abuse to which the attentionof the militaiy authorities should be directed.Question of Compensation.If the Licensing Authority in tiris country have thecourage to make a fol'ward move to reduce the numberof public houses, then the question oI compensationhas to be considered. This is a thorny question, onwhich I will merely touch.Since the case o-f Sharpe u. Wakefield, decided in r89z,it seems beyond bevond doubt, doubt. that there is. no stricf strict Ipoel l.egal cleinr claimto compensation for the ioss of a public house licence.The licence is granted for one year, and no longer.Furthermore, it is given to a particular' person {or aparticular house; but the Iaw recognises no l)ropertyin the licence, except during its annua"l currency. H'encri,when a licence holder is dying he cannot bequeath it,neither does it become an asset of his legal representative,who has to make a formal appJication for itf transfer.Again, r,vhatever vievrs individual justices may haveon this point, when there is a question of the refusalof a transfer or renewal in the ordinary way, they neednot be deterred {rom doing theii duiy, through fearof inflicting injury or ruin on the licence hoider:. Forthere are licence Insurance Companies which, for smallpremiums, will insure the holders against loss of licence,whether through misconduct, or for any other cause.Then the brewers themselves have combined to establishTHE DRINK QUESTION.Mutual Insurance Companies for the same purpose.p9 tha! every prudent licence holder can easily securehimself against the loss of his licence in one of thesecompanies.But if the Licensing Authority undertake to reduceon a large scale the number of public houses, on theground of their not being,necessary, then the questionof compensation would arise from another point of view.By the suppression of some the surviving ones wouldderive very substantial benefits on account of diminishedcompetition, and thus an inequality would be created.It would seem only fair, in such cases, that the owners ofthe suppressed- licences should get, at least, a moneycompensation from the houses that remain; whether iiraddition they should not get security of tenure for a certainnumber of years before srrppression, from the LicensingAuthority, is a matter of detail into which we need no1enter.Existing Licensing Authority not to bo Ended, butMethods Moniled.-As regards the I-icensing Authority itself in this country. whilst its record on the whole has been one of mal--a-dqrnistration, I s.hould be sorry to see any radicalchairge in its constitution, or to have the po#er takenfrom the Justices, and given over to the Cbunty CourtJudges, as was suggested some time ago. I hm notso desporrdent as that of the administrative capacityof my fellorv-coutrymen. Moreo.,ver, among the Licinsin!Justices there are men of ability, expeiience, and inldependent char-acter, heedless of -the bieath of passingpopularity, and beyoud _yielding to the tempiationland pressure of local influences. We cannoi affordto lose the services of such men, as without them anvgeneral and permanent reform of the Licensine Authoritvwould scarcely be possible at present. It itrikes ond,howeve_l, that the present I icefising Authority is ratheiunwieldly for effectual working puiposes.Would it not be competenC for the Justices in eachlicensing district, to- appioint out of thLir own f"ay icommittee of capablef independent men for a cer6in3I