13.07.2015 Views

Forward-Looking Bidding in Online Auctions. - The University of ...

Forward-Looking Bidding in Online Auctions. - The University of ...

Forward-Looking Bidding in Online Auctions. - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

game. F<strong>in</strong>ally, it is notable that bidders only submit positive bids on products <strong>of</strong> their desiredtype – a result that will lead to identification <strong>of</strong> personal preferences <strong>in</strong> the empirical test.<strong>The</strong> bidd<strong>in</strong>g function is fully characterized by the expected surplus function S, which is <strong>in</strong>turn characterized by the steady-state distribution <strong>of</strong> the future competition c 1 conditional on thecurrent competition c 0 and all the state variables <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the relationship between them:( | , , , , , )G c c ϕ ϕ ϕ ω ω . In equilibrium, the surplus function must reflect the actual expected1 0 0 1 2 1 2surplus given that everyone uses the optimal bidd<strong>in</strong>g strategy (2). <strong>The</strong>refore, the equilibriumexpected surplus function must satisfy the Bellman equation (3). Such an S function existsbecause <strong>of</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>of</strong> f, compactness <strong>of</strong> its support, and the fact (shown <strong>in</strong> the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>Proposition 1) that the slope <strong>of</strong> S <strong>in</strong> any <strong>of</strong> its arguments is uniformly bounded. However,equilibrium S cannot be expressed <strong>in</strong> closed form even for a simple distribution F and small N.Despite the lack <strong>of</strong> a closed-form solution, some general comparative statics <strong>of</strong> the bidd<strong>in</strong>gfunction can be derived from an analysis <strong>of</strong> the Bellman equation (see Appendix for a pro<strong>of</strong>):Proposition 2: For all F, the equilibriumb( ϕ , ϕ , ω , v)0 1 1has the follow<strong>in</strong>g properties:( )1) b 1, ϕ , ω , v <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> ω2)1 1( ) ( )1( )b 0, ϕ , ω , v = 0< b 1,1, ω , v < b 1,0, ω , v < v for all v>0.1 1 1 1( )3) b 1, ϕ , ω , v decreases <strong>in</strong> ρ1 1<strong>The</strong> first property shows that bids decrease when the future gets closer <strong>in</strong> the sense that ω 1decreases. In the empirical section, a generalization <strong>of</strong> this result will be tested, namely theprediction that bids decrease as the number <strong>of</strong> auctions <strong>in</strong> the next hour <strong>in</strong>creases. <strong>The</strong> secondproperty conta<strong>in</strong>s several important results. <strong>The</strong> first <strong>in</strong>equality shows that all bidders withpositive valuations submit positive bids on objects. This both guarantees trade and allows an13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!