gene Flow: Implications for Crop Diversity and Wild Relatives
gene Flow: Implications for Crop Diversity and Wild Relatives
gene Flow: Implications for Crop Diversity and Wild Relatives
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
introduction or interaction with other <strong>gene</strong>s) that are importantconsiderations <strong>for</strong> assessing <strong>gene</strong> establishment, expression,<strong>and</strong> hence fitness effects. Further, other levels of biologicalorganisation within the plant (transcriptome, proteome,metabolome) may also have direct impacts on fitness of <strong>gene</strong>flow. Another consideration is that the dominant currency of<strong>gene</strong> flow research as <strong>gene</strong>s conferring traits assumes that all<strong>gene</strong>s transferred will be protein-coding <strong>gene</strong>s. This fails toconsider the vast array of non-protein encoding DNA <strong>and</strong> RNAderivatives that are also implicated in the transfer of <strong>gene</strong>ticin<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>and</strong> the outcomes from one population to another(Mattick 2003).Thus, the evolutionary implications of hybridisation <strong>and</strong>introgression from crop to crop or crop to l<strong>and</strong>race/wildpopulations where it actually occurs are dependent on a numberof factors, where the fitness effects cannot be predicted a priorito GM crop release, <strong>and</strong> may change over hybrid <strong>gene</strong>rations.There<strong>for</strong>e, studies must be conducted on a case-by-case basiswithin any given context (country, environment, GMO, etc.)where relevant scientific questions can be addressed.22