13.07.2015 Views

250 Problems in Elementary Number Theory - Sierpinski (1970)

250 Problems in Elementary Number Theory - Sierpinski (1970)

250 Problems in Elementary Number Theory - Sierpinski (1970)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 <strong>250</strong> PROBLEMS IN NUMBER THEORYLet n be a given positive <strong>in</strong>teger. We have obviously n!lJi(n!)-I, hencef{n!) = n! k + 1, where k is an <strong>in</strong>teger. The absolute value of the polynomialhex) (which is of the order> 0) <strong>in</strong>creases over all bounds with x; for sufficientlylarge n we shall have therefore If(n!)1 = In!k+ 11 > 1, and the numbern!k+l has a prime divisor p. In view of pln!k+l we must have p > n,and s<strong>in</strong>ce pflt(n!), the congruence hex) = 0 (modp) is solvable for a primemodulus p > n. S<strong>in</strong>ce n is arbitrary, we deduce that the congruence fi(x)== 0 (modp), and also the congruence f(x) = 0 (modp) is solvable for <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itelymany primes p.131. There is only one such number, namely k = 1. Then the sequencek+l, k+2, ... , k+l0 (1)conta<strong>in</strong>s five primes: 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11. For k = 0 and k = 2,' sequence(1) conta<strong>in</strong>s four primes. If k ~ 3, then sequence (1) does not conta<strong>in</strong>number 3; as we know, out of each three consecutive odd numbers, one mustbe divisible by 3. It follows that sequence (1) conta<strong>in</strong>s at least one oddcomposite number. Besides that, sequence (1) conta<strong>in</strong>s five even numbers,hence (for k ~ 2) these numbers are composite. Thus, for k ~ 3, sequence(1) conta<strong>in</strong>s at least 6 composite numbers, and the numbers of primes cannotexceed 4.REMARK. Sequence (1) conta<strong>in</strong>s four primes for k = 0, 2, 10, 100, 190,820. We do not know whether there exist <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itely many such numbers k.From a certa<strong>in</strong> conjecture of A. Sch<strong>in</strong>zel concern<strong>in</strong>g primes ([22]) it followsthat the answer is positive.132. There exists only one such number, namely k = 1. For this valuethe sequencek+l, k+2, ... , k+:lOO (1)conta<strong>in</strong>s 26 primes. For k = 0, 2, 3 or 4, sequence (1) conta<strong>in</strong>s 25 primes.Thus, we may assume that k ~ 5. Sequence (I) conta<strong>in</strong>s 50 even numbers,which for k > 1 are all composite. Next, it conta<strong>in</strong>s also SO successiveodd numbers, and s<strong>in</strong>ce every three consecutive odd numbers conta<strong>in</strong> onedivisible by 3, sequence (I) conta<strong>in</strong>s at least 16 numbers divisible by 3,which are all composite for k > 2.Let us compute now the number of terms of sequence (1) which are divisibleby 5, and neither by 3 or 2. All such numbers will be of the form

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!