02.12.2012 Views

0 jbtm vol. 6, no. 2 the proclamation of the gospel - Baptist Center for ...

0 jbtm vol. 6, no. 2 the proclamation of the gospel - Baptist Center for ...

0 jbtm vol. 6, no. 2 the proclamation of the gospel - Baptist Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 ٠ JBTM Vol. 6 No. 2 The Proclamation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel<br />

Paul Scott Wilson also emphasized <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> biblical metaphors,<br />

encouraging preachers to use biblical models <strong>of</strong> metaphor to create <strong>the</strong>ir own metaphors to<br />

communicate biblical <strong>the</strong>mes. Wilson pointed out four main functions <strong>of</strong> metaphor in<br />

preaching: (1) a point <strong>of</strong> contact between <strong>the</strong> biblical world and listener’s world, (2) <strong>the</strong><br />

dominant image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central idea, (3) stories as extended metaphor, and (4) <strong>the</strong>ological<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> experience. 32 He discussed metaphor within <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> linear and polar<br />

thought. Linear thought reflects progression and focuses upon a proposition. In contrast,<br />

polar thought reflects digression through comparison, contradiction, or metaphor, with<br />

metaphor being <strong>the</strong> principal <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> digression. Wilson advocated a blend <strong>of</strong> polar and<br />

linear thought. 33<br />

Claiming that metaphor is more than illustration, Richard Lischer encouraged<br />

homileticians to interact with contemporary metaphor <strong>the</strong>ory. He believed that many<br />

metaphors in sermons today are dead metaphors, metaphors that have become so familiar<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>no</strong> longer are considered metaphors. Lischer described a master’s metaphor as<br />

being substitutionary and illustrative. A pupil’s metaphor, however, is <strong>the</strong> only way to<br />

express certain <strong>the</strong>ological <strong>the</strong>mes such as <strong>for</strong>giveness. Lischer emphasized <strong>the</strong> need to<br />

create new metaphors to communicate biblical truth, writing that “images drawn from <strong>the</strong><br />

center <strong>of</strong> human life . . . <strong>no</strong>t only illustrate <strong>the</strong> divine story but are capable <strong>of</strong> receiving light<br />

from <strong>the</strong> text.” 34<br />

Research in <strong>the</strong> Use <strong>of</strong> Metaphors in Preaching<br />

The review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> metaphor in homiletical literature indicates that recent<br />

scholars have encouraged homileticians to interact with contemporary metaphor <strong>the</strong>ory.<br />

One way to interact would be to investigate <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> metaphors in sermons in light <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se contemporary <strong>the</strong>ories. For instance, a recent analysis <strong>of</strong> selected sermons by Robert<br />

G. Lee extends contemporary metaphor <strong>the</strong>ory to homiletics. 35 The focus <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analyses<br />

was Lee’s intentional use <strong>of</strong> metaphors in representative judgment and encouragement<br />

sermons. Based upon linguist Gerard Steen’s suggestions regarding <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> metaphors,<br />

<strong>the</strong> investigation <strong>of</strong> this nature should consist <strong>of</strong> a grammatical, conceptual, and<br />

32 Paul Scott Wilson, The Practice <strong>of</strong> Preaching (Nashville: Abingdon, 1995), 246-52.<br />

33 Ibid., 220, 239-43.<br />

34 Richard Lischer, “‘What Language Shall I Borrow?’ The Role <strong>of</strong> Metaphor in<br />

Proclamation,” Dialog 26 (fall 1987): 287.<br />

35 Lee was a <strong>no</strong>table Sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Baptist</strong> preacher re<strong>no</strong>wned <strong>for</strong> his use <strong>of</strong> figurative<br />

language, especially metaphor. He served as <strong>the</strong> pastor <strong>of</strong> Belleview <strong>Baptist</strong> Church in<br />

Memphis, Tennessee, <strong>for</strong> thirty-two years, beginning in 1927. He also served three terms as<br />

president <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Baptist</strong> Convention. David Larsen claimed that “<strong>no</strong> one<br />

exemplifies <strong>the</strong> old-time Sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Baptist</strong> preacher better than Robert G. Lee.” See David L.<br />

Larsen, The Company <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Preachers: A History <strong>of</strong> Biblical Preaching from <strong>the</strong> Old Testament to <strong>the</strong><br />

Modern Era (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1998), 742-3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!