13.07.2015 Views

Technology Asset Protection Association (TAPA) “Securing the ...

Technology Asset Protection Association (TAPA) “Securing the ...

Technology Asset Protection Association (TAPA) “Securing the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Technology</strong><strong>Asset</strong> <strong>Protection</strong><strong>Association</strong>(<strong>TAPA</strong>)“Securing <strong>the</strong> Global SupplyChain”Rosita Swain


AgendaWhat is <strong>TAPA</strong><strong>TAPA</strong> Evolution2004 Strategic Objectives<strong>TAPA</strong> Uniformed Approach<strong>TAPA</strong> Uniformed ProcessContinuous Improvement


What is <strong>TAPA</strong>?<strong>Technology</strong><strong>Asset</strong><strong>Protection</strong><strong>Association</strong>is an forum of security, insurance andlogistics professionals representing hightechnology companies who have organizedfor <strong>the</strong> purpose of addressing <strong>the</strong> emergingcargo security threats that are common to <strong>the</strong>technology industry.


What <strong>TAPA</strong> is NOTForum for “blacklisting” of suppliers– Information sharing is done on standards andBKM’s, not on any supplier performance issuesForum for comparison of industry/supplier losses– All discussion under NDA----$ $ = “don’t ask / don’ttell”Guarantor of business– Supplier compliance to standards gaugedindependently– Certified suppliers to be listed on limited accesswebsite----non-certified locations not listedUnreasonable or cost-prohibitive


Evolution of <strong>TAPA</strong>1997: Security Professionals meet for firsttime to address problems <strong>the</strong>y face in regardsto high tech components <strong>the</strong>ft:– No one is exempt from cargo <strong>the</strong>ft– Demand for product peaking– Highly liquid components and demand on gray andblack markets– Conclusion: Establish a Forum dedicated todevelopment of best known protective measures,benchmarking and global implementation


1998-2000:Evolution Continued– Development of Standards:Audit CriteriaContractual Security T&C’s in form of FreightSecurity RequirementsScoring Matrix– 1999 <strong>TAPA</strong> EMEA formed– 2000 <strong>TAPA</strong> Asia formed– <strong>TAPA</strong> Worldwide Council developed


Charter of <strong>TAPA</strong> AsiaEstablish best known security practices infreight transportation and influence <strong>the</strong>iradoption by regulatory bodiesPromote compliance with identified bestpracticesIdentify latest technology in protection ofassetsShare information among members


2004 Strategic Objectives1. Continuous Improvement of FSR, ScoringMatrix, Audit ProtocolAnnual publication of FSRDue 1 January Every YearDevelop Worldwide Change Control Board protocol2. Develop Complete Supply Chain CertificationProgramTrucking OperationsIntegrator RequirementsAirline/Airport/Government Cargo Handling Facility Requirements3PL Complete Q1, 20033. Broaden <strong>TAPA</strong> ScopeShift from high tech to high exposurePharmaceutical membership


<strong>TAPA</strong> Uniformed Approach


Putting <strong>the</strong> Right SecurityMeasures in PlaceClassification of facilities in 3 categories----A, B, C--Cdepending on level of threat– As calculated by environmental and historical data andrisk aversion level for individual company– Highest level classification requires highest level ofsecurityApplied to trucking operationsAssessment protocol using 0 - 2 qualitative score----noweighting


3PHILOSOPHY• VALUE• VOLUME• VULNERABILITY


FREIGHT SECURITYFREIGHT SECURITYStandard Assessment ProtocolTrainingContractual LanguageConsequencesInvestigationsFreight Security Requirements


FREIGHT SECURITYELEMENTSDocumentationFreight Security Requirements– Specific required securityelements, with functionaldescriptionsContractual Language– FSR as addendum toLogistics contractsStandard Assessment Protocol– Standardized audits– Standardized scoring matrix– Standardized reportsProcessesConsequences– Corrective actions– Termination of contractTraining– Internal and Supplier– Requirements and auditingInvestigations– Roles and responsibilitiesafter loss– Recovery of property andapprehension of thieves


<strong>TAPA</strong> Uniformed Process


ACERENTEXMICRONPACKARD BELLAMDHITACHIMATSUSHITAMERISELPHILIPSAMDAHLINGRAMNORREDQUANTUMIndependentAMGENASPEN SYS.AMSGATEWAYIBMSAMSUNGSEAGATESED INT.Auditors:AVNETBAY NETWKSBERNES GPFREIGHTCARRIER /FORWARDERSILICON GR.SOLECTRONSMITH ASSOC.CELESTICASONYCISCOSUN MICRO.Move FromCOMARKCOMPAQH. PACKARDMICROAGETECH DATATEXAS INST.This…CYRIX/NSMDELLDIGITALFAIRCHILDINACOMINTELMAXTORLEXMARKMOTOROLAPNYTOSHIBA3COMWESTERN DIG.…To This<strong>TAPA</strong>AUTHORIZEDAUDITORFREIGHTCARRIER /FORWARDER


AuditFirms


Audit Criteria1. Perimeter Security Preventative Measures ScoreWarehouseClassificationX if notScored1.2 CCTV Systems 1.2.1 - CCTV external coverage of shipping andreceiving yard to cover movement of vehicles and 0 A 0people1.2.2 - 100% CCTV external coverage of all dockdoors0 A 01.2.3 - CCTV system able to view all sides of <strong>the</strong>facility0 A 01.3 Lighting 1.3.1 -Flood lighting of enclosed loading/unloadingareas0 A 01.3.2 - Dock doors illuminated externally at night 0 A 01.3.3. - External and internal lighting levels thatsupport high quality CCTV images and recording0 A 01.4 Perimeter alarm 1.4.1 - All facility external doors alarmed & linked todetectionmain alarm system0 A 01.5 Perimeterwindows, doors &o<strong>the</strong>r openings1.5.1 - Any windows or o<strong>the</strong>r openings in warehousewalls must secured by steel bars/mesh and alarmed(or o<strong>the</strong>r material that would harden <strong>the</strong> opening toburglary)1.5.2 - Ground floor warehouse windows protected byanti-ram posts or o<strong>the</strong>r physical barrier1.5.3 - Dock doors of sufficient strength or design toprevent or delay forced entry by use of portable handtools or ramming by vehicle, interior hinge pins andsealed hardware1.5.4 - Reinforced exit doors from warehouse (steeldoors & frames or suitable alternative1.5.5 - Exterior walls to be designed to resistpenetration by removing building fabric, cutting orramming by vehicle2. Access Control -Preventative MeasuresOffice Areas2.1 Office Entrances 2.1.1 - Guard or Receptionist on main office entrypoints2.1.2 - Security controlled access points (i.e. Cardaccess & CCTV)TotalScore0 A 00 A 00 A 00 A 00 A 0ScoreSection Total: 0Total Possible: 24Warehouse X if not TotalClassification Scored Score0 A 0 00 A 0 0


Continuous Improvement


CustomsTradePartnershipAgainstTerrorism (errorism (C C TPAT)Supply Chain Security requirements: Factory,Warehouse, Docks, Forwarder/Integrator FacilitiesShared FSR’s, Audit Protocol, and Scoring Matrixwith program management, best known methodsto dateAlignment agreement that <strong>TAPA</strong> securityrequirements fulfill supplier and manufacturerobligation if certified


The Infrastructure SecurityPartnership:– Cargo Security– Risk/Threat Assessments inSupply ChainTransportation SecurityAdministration:<strong>TAPA</strong> Partners– Partnership on developmentof FTL / LTL trailer loadsecurity requirements– <strong>TAPA</strong> Standards template forin transit cargo protectionNational Cargo SecurityCouncil


OpportunitiesPartner with Insurance industries, worldwidealliance with <strong>TAPA</strong> and insurancecommunity….Americas model– Invite to London Market to <strong>TAPA</strong> EMEA andAsia members to <strong>TAPA</strong> AsiaProliferation of <strong>TAPA</strong>, coverage mandatesPremium / Coverage Recognition:– Suppliers that have facilities certified– Manufacturers that have written in <strong>TAPA</strong> intoLogistics contracts


<strong>TAPA</strong> Asia Websitewww.<strong>TAPA</strong>-asia.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!