13.07.2015 Views

Technical Paper No 8 - Annual reports for the AAQ NEPM

Technical Paper No 8 - Annual reports for the AAQ NEPM

Technical Paper No 8 - Annual reports for the AAQ NEPM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

National Environment Protection (Ambient Air Quality) Measure<strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Paper</strong> <strong>No</strong>. 8 – <strong>Annual</strong> ReportsIn addition, Clause 17(3) specifies that jurisdictions may provide an evaluation of a region as awhole against <strong>the</strong> standards. A region is in compliance if, and only if, every per<strong>for</strong>mancemonitoring station in <strong>the</strong> region meets <strong>the</strong> standards and goal. Based on this definition, <strong>the</strong>compliance status of <strong>the</strong> region as a whole can be stated in <strong>the</strong> last column of Tables 1 to 6(Per<strong>for</strong>mance against <strong>the</strong> standards and goal). A broader description of regional assessmentmay be included under section D.Clause 14(3) of <strong>the</strong> <strong>AAQ</strong> <strong>NEPM</strong> allows fewer monitoring stations to be used in regions where itcan be demonstrated that pollutant levels are reasonably expected to be consistently lower than<strong>the</strong> <strong>NEPM</strong> standards. The PRC has <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e developed screening procedures (described in<strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Paper</strong> <strong>No</strong>. 4) which specify <strong>the</strong> circumstances under which monitoring is notrequired in a region that is o<strong>the</strong>rwise covered by <strong>the</strong> <strong>NEPM</strong>. The arguments justifying <strong>the</strong>absence of monitoring in <strong>the</strong>se regions are detailed in <strong>the</strong> approved monitoring plans. Theseregions should be listed in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> Report separately from Tables 1 to 6 with a note that<strong>the</strong>y are in compliance under Clause 14(3) that <strong>the</strong> pollutant levels are reasonably expected tobe consistently lower than <strong>the</strong> <strong>NEPM</strong> standard.Air quality assessment using methods o<strong>the</strong>r than physical monitoring are also possible. The<strong>AAQ</strong> <strong>NEPM</strong> in Clause 11(b) permits <strong>the</strong> use of alternative means that provide in<strong>for</strong>mationequivalent to measurements, which would o<strong>the</strong>rwise occur at a per<strong>for</strong>mance monitoringstation. Such alternatives must be documented and <strong>for</strong>mally approved in monitoring plans. Ifthis were to occur, <strong>the</strong> data should be reported in <strong>the</strong> same <strong>for</strong>mat as <strong>for</strong> physical monitoring.The yearly in<strong>for</strong>mation, <strong>for</strong> each pollutant and per<strong>for</strong>mance monitoring station in each regionthat must be included in this section, consists of:1. <strong>the</strong> percentage of data available <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> calendar year as well as <strong>for</strong> each calendar quarter<strong>for</strong> each per<strong>for</strong>mance station;2. <strong>the</strong> number of exceedence days <strong>for</strong> each per<strong>for</strong>mance station;3. <strong>the</strong> annual mean concentration <strong>for</strong> pollutants with a 1-year standard; and4. <strong>the</strong> compliance status <strong>for</strong> each pollutant at each per<strong>for</strong>mance monitoring station in relationto <strong>the</strong> standards and <strong>the</strong> goal, as "met", "not met" or "not demonstrated."The proposed <strong>for</strong>mats <strong>for</strong> each of <strong>the</strong> <strong>AAQ</strong> <strong>NEPM</strong> pollutants are shown in Tables 1 to 6.Page 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!