Breast Reconstruction Patients Educational Brochure - Mentor

More documents

Recommendations

Info

64Low Molecular Weight (LMW)Silicone: 33-34Lumpectomy: 12Lymphadenopathy: 30,33Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI):15,17,20-21,24,43-45,47-49,54Mammography: 15,31Mastectomy: 12-13,28-29,34-41Mastopexy: 38,41MedWatch: 56MemoryShape Breast ImplantCore Study: 12,16,20,24,26-30,34,40,45-46,50-51,53-55Necrosis: 16-18,20-21,24,29,41,48Neurological Disease: 33Pain: 15-26,28-32,34-35,42,44,47,49,51,53,55Periareolar Incision: 29,40Periumbilical Approach: 40Plastic Surgery: 32,41,56Platinum: 33-34Postoperative Care: 42Precautions: 14Saline: 16,33,35-36,40,59,61Scar Revision: 18-19,23,50Scarring: 12,16-21,23-24,27-29,36,41,47,49-51Seroma: 16-17,19,21,24-25,47,49-53Silent Rupture: 15,20,24,27,44Silicone: 12-13,15-16,24,26-27,29-35,40,43-45,49,54,56,59,61Subglandular Placement: 13,40Submuscular Placement: 13,40Suicide: 33,54-55Summary of Safety andEffectiveness Document (SSED): 56Surgical Incision: 16Systemic Disease: 27Tissue Flap Procedure: 34,36,38Tissue Flap Reconstruction: 34,36,38Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS): 25TRAM Flap: 36-38Warnings: 14Wrinkling: 19-20,23-24,26-28,35,39,48-53,63Ptosis (sagging): 19,23,47,49-50,52Reoperation: 15-25,27-28,42,46-51Reproduction Complications: 54-55Revision-Reconstruction: 12-13,16,21,24,26,28-29,34,45-46,48-49,51,53-55Risks: 12,14-16,21,28,30,31,34,39,41,45,56,59,61Rupture: 15-17,20-21,24-27,30,34,43-45,47-50,54,58
6516. REFERENCES1. Collis, N., et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Explantation Investigation of Long-TermSilicone Gel Implant Integrity. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 120(5): 1401-1406 (2007).2. Hölmich, L.R., et al. Prevalence of silicone breast implant rupture among Danishwomen. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 108(4):848-858 (2001).3. Gaubitz, M., Jackisch, C., Domschke, W., Heindel, W. & Pfleiderer, B. Silicone breastimplants: correlation between implant ruptures, magnetic resonance spectroscopicallyestimated silicone presence in the liver, antibody status and clinical symptoms.Rheumatology (Oxford) 41, 129-135; discussion 123-124 (2002).4. Brown, S. L., Duggirala, H. J. & Pennello, G. An association of silicone-gel breastimplant rupture and fibromyalgia. Curr Rheumatol Rep 4, 293-298 (2002).5. Brown, S. L., Pennello, G., Berg, W. A., Soo, M. S. & Middleton, M. S. Silicone gel breastimplant rupture, extracapsular silicone, and health status in a population of women. JRheumatol 28, 996-1003 (2001).6. Hölmich, L. R. et al. Self-reported diseases and symptoms by rupture status amongunselected Danish women with cosmetic silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg111, 723-732; discussion 733-724 (2003).7. Katzin, W. E., Centeno, J. A., Feng, L. J., Kiley, M. & Mullick, F. G. Pathology of lymphnodes from patients with breast implants: a histologic and spectroscopic evaluation.Am J Surg Pathol 29, 506-511 (2005).8. Berner, I., Gaubitz, M., Jackisch, C. & Pfleiderer, B. Comparative examination ofcomplaints of patients with breast-cancer with and without silicone implants. Eur JObstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 102, 61-66 (2002).9. Bondurant, S., Ernster, V. L. & Herdman, R. Safety of Silicone Breast Implants.Committee on the Safety of Silicone Breast Implants, Division of Health Promotion andDisease Prevention, Institute of Medicine. (National Academy Press., 2000).10. Brown, S. L., Todd, J. F., Cope, J. U. & Sachs, H. C. Breast implant surveillance reports tothe U.S. Food and Drug Administration: maternal child health problems. J Long TermEff Med Implants 16, 281-290 (2006).11. Hurst, N.M. Lactation after augmentation mammoplasty. Obstet. Gynecol.87(1):30-4 (1996).12. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG). Breast feeding: Maternal andInfant Aspects. Educational Bulletin Number 258 (July 2000).13. Kronowitz, S. J. & Robb, G. L. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a criticalreview of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 124, 395-408 (2009).14. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Vol. 74 (IARC Press 1999).15. European Committee on Quality Assurance (EQUAM) and Medical Devices in PlasticSurgery. Consensus declaration on breast implants 23-6-2000. Israel, European Committee16. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Breast implants: Status of research at the NationalInstitutes of Health (2005).17. Herdman, R.C., et al. Silicone breast implants and cancer. Cancer Invest.2001;19(8):821-32 (2001).18. Brisson, J. et al. Cancer incidence in a cohort of Ontario and Quebec women havingbilateral breast augmentation. Int J Cancer 118, 2854-2862 (2006).19. Brinton, L. A. et al. Breast cancer following augmentation mammoplasty(United States). Cancer Causes Control 11, 819-827 (2000).20. Deapen, D., Hamilton, A., Bernstein, L. & Brody, G. S. Breast cancer stage at diagnosis
Page 1 and 2:
Patient Educational BrochureRECONST
Page 3 and 4:
1PATIENT EDUCATIONAL BROCHURERECONS
Page 5 and 6:
3GLOSSARYAbdomenAnaplastic Large Ce
Page 7 and 8:
5Connective TissueDisease/Disorder
Page 9 and 10:
7Latissimus Dorsi FlapLatissimus Do
Page 11 and 12:
9Primary BreastReconstructionProsth
Page 13:
11Tissue ExpanderTissue FlapReconst
Page 17 and 18: 15WARNING - The following is a list
Page 19 and 20: EventKey ComplicationsImplant Remov
Page 21 and 22: Event19Table 1 ContinuedLikelihood
Page 23 and 24: EventAny ComplicationExcluding Rupt
Page 25 and 26: Event23Likelihood of the EventOccur
Page 27 and 28: 25Mentor will continue its MemorySh
Page 29 and 30: 27Sometimes there are symptoms asso
Page 31 and 32: 29A surgeon can minimize the chance
Page 33 and 34: 31The Institute of Medicine (IOM) r
Page 35 and 36: 33• Effects on Children Born to M
Page 37 and 38: 356.2 Breast Reconstruction with Im
Page 39 and 40: 37place to create the new breast. T
Page 41 and 42: 6.5 Choosing the Right Implant for
Page 43 and 44: 41Immediate reconstruction may allo
Page 45 and 46: 437.3 Caring for Yourself in the Mo
Page 47 and 48: What to do if the Implant Rupture i
Page 49 and 50: 47Table 63-Year and 6-Year Complica
Page 51 and 52: 49Table 73-Year and 6-Year Complica
Page 53 and 54: 51Revision-ReconstructionIn the Men
Page 55 and 56: 53Revision-ReconstructionThe main r
Page 57 and 58: 55Connective Tissue Disease (CTD)In
Page 59 and 60: 5711. MENTOR’S IMPLANT TRACKING P
Page 61 and 62: 59201 Mentor Drive, Santa Barbara,
Page 63 and 64: 61201 Mentor Drive, Santa Barbara,
Page 65: 6315. INDEXAlternatives to Breast I
Page 69 and 70: 41. Blackburn, W. D., Jr. & Everson
Page 71 and 72: This page is intentionally left bla
show all

Breast Reconstruction Patients Educational Brochure - Mentor

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?