74 MINUTES OF THE SYNOD OF THEniable pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> this is to be found in what the Court cited insupport <strong>of</strong> its pronouncement; namely, a number <strong>of</strong> our numerousChristian usages, customs, laws and institutions with whichwe are all more or less familiar and in the existence and prevalence<strong>of</strong> which we all rejoice. For a nation to abound in these,even to be threaded through and through with them, is onething, but manifestly to do the will <strong>of</strong> God because it is Hiswill and out <strong>of</strong> a supreme desire to honor and glorify Him,(and that is the test by which we determine whether or no aman is a Christian) is quite another thing. And we must everkeep clearly in mind that it is because our nation as such neverhas openly owned Christ as its Lord and His law, in so far asthat law relates to nations, as the rule <strong>of</strong> its life and standard<strong>of</strong> its conduct, and so expressed itself in its highest written law,that Covenanters are political dissenters.3. Even the Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> the United States cannotamend the Federal Constitution by interpretation to the degree<strong>of</strong> turning a lack <strong>of</strong> any reference into a positive declarationfor acknowledging Jesus Christ and His law. The actual opinionin question is, as we have said, concerning a statute law, andonly concludes from the argument "This is a religious people,"that no purpose <strong>of</strong> action against religion can be imputed in alaw when no reference to religion is made. Justice Brewer doesnot say that, if there had been a specific reference forbiddinghiring a foreign clergyman, this provision would have beenunconstitutional because the Constitution is Christian.In his argument to prove that this is a religious people, herefers to the Federal Constitution only in two clauses. One isin the First Amendment, that Congress shall make no law respectingan establishment <strong>of</strong> religion, or prohibiting the freeexercise there<strong>of</strong>, a provision which he indicates is a provisiontouching "upon the private life <strong>of</strong> the individual." This cannot,as we see it, be interpreted into a decision on the public life<strong>of</strong> the nation. The other provision Justice Brewer refers to isthat the Executive shall have ten days (Sundays excepted) toact upon a bill. This granting to the Executive a rest day doesnot require him to keep it as a Sabbath. This, therefore, cannot,as we see it, be a declaration for Jesus Christ and His law.4. This decision, as we see it, makes no distinction, eitherexpressly or impliedly, between the nation and its agent thegovernment. It is because the political body which constitutesthe governing society <strong>of</strong> our country in its compact <strong>of</strong> government—ourwritten fundamental law which lays down the principlesby which the nation is to be governed—sets up the will <strong>of</strong>the ruling majority as <strong>of</strong> supreme authority in civil life ratherthan the will <strong>of</strong> the only rightful Lord and Ruler <strong>of</strong> all nations,that the Covenanters maintain the position <strong>of</strong> political dissent.And until that compact has been altered in such a way as t<strong>of</strong>orty the recognize tain <strong>of</strong>fense desired o. our years before this position the result ago. decision Divine God. as It as the We will was well most simply as rendered as supreme, effective to must keep at in obey we means the a our time are God year consciences <strong>of</strong> pledged when rather 1892, bringing we than well to void had mainabout men. nigh <strong>of</strong>
REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 75our membership men <strong>of</strong> ability who had not only made a thoroughand comprehensive study <strong>of</strong> laws, both constitutional and statutory,but the fruits <strong>of</strong> whose labors we have in written form.And in not a single instance, so far as we know, has any one <strong>of</strong>these men, some <strong>of</strong> whom within recent months only have goneto their reward, found in this decision anything to justify thesurrendering <strong>of</strong> our position <strong>of</strong> political dissent. Rather haveeach and all <strong>of</strong> them found in it an encouragement to labor moreearnestly and hopefully to bring our nation to an open acknowledgment<strong>of</strong> God and His Christ.In view <strong>of</strong> the above we would, so far from giving up theposition <strong>of</strong> political dissent, emphasize anew the importance <strong>of</strong>maintaining it as a means to the end <strong>of</strong> arresting public thoughtand directing it to our constitutional defect and the remedy forthe same.But along with this reply to the query propounded yourcommittee desires to put on record its keen appreciation <strong>of</strong> thesituation which prompted the query, and also <strong>of</strong> the spirit andforesightedness <strong>of</strong> the author <strong>of</strong> the query and his concern torelieve the situation in Indiana, brought about by the recentaction <strong>of</strong> the legislature <strong>of</strong> that state. Furthermore, in the light<strong>of</strong> this and numerous other somewhat similar situations arisingfrorii time to time that embarrass our people, we record itas our conviction that this court should, at the present meeting,take some action to aid them in securing relief, if possible, fromthis embarrassment.Respectfully submitted,JAMES S. MARTIN,The same committee was directed GEO. S. to COLEMAN,prepare and submitto this <strong>Synod</strong> a form <strong>of</strong> substitute t. c. Mcknight,oath to be used byCovenanter teachers and others required J. WALKER to take WILSON, an oath tothe Constitution.T. D. RUSSELL.The report on Unfinished Business was taken up.Item 1. The Moderator to reply to a letter from the<strong>Synod</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ireland, and to write Miss F. Elma French <strong>of</strong> theMersine Mission. Attended to.Item 2. To complete work on the Children's Handbook.W. J. McKnight submitted the report, which was adoptedand is as follows:REPORT ON YOUNG PEOPLE'S HANDBOOKThe thought <strong>of</strong> preparing a Young People's Handbookcame to birth at the <strong>Synod</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1921, and has been on its pilgrimageever since. In 1925 <strong>Synod</strong> appointed a Committee to