13.07.2015 Views

the puppet as a figure of the other final P PIRIS 2013 - Central ...

the puppet as a figure of the other final P PIRIS 2013 - Central ...

the puppet as a figure of the other final P PIRIS 2013 - Central ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to oneself. In Le Jeu de la Marionnette: l’Objet Intermédiaire et son Métathéâtre(1981), Gilles adopts a Lacanian perspective to discuss how <strong>puppet</strong>s can be used bychildren <strong>as</strong> transitional objects in developing <strong>the</strong>ir relation to <strong>the</strong>mselves and <strong>the</strong> world.She also explicitly refers to concepts developed by British psychoanalyst DonaldWinnicott in Playing and Reality (first published in 1971). Although I consider <strong>the</strong><strong>puppet</strong> <strong>as</strong> an image, <strong>as</strong> it will be fur<strong>the</strong>r discussed in Chapter III, my understanding <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r is not Lacanian but related to <strong>the</strong> philosophy <strong>of</strong> French Existentialist Jean-Paul Sartre and to some extent to <strong>the</strong> philosophy <strong>of</strong> French phenomenologist EmmanuelLevin<strong>as</strong>. I have favoured a Sartrean phenomenological approach to manipulactingbecause I examine <strong>the</strong> alterity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>puppet</strong> through its ontological ambiguity. Even ifin some c<strong>as</strong>es <strong>the</strong> relation <strong>of</strong> self to O<strong>the</strong>r between <strong>the</strong> manipulactor and his <strong>puppet</strong> canrepresent a relation <strong>of</strong> oneself to oneself, <strong>as</strong> will be discussed in Chapter IV in regard to<strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Compagnie Mossoux-Bonté for instance, this is not <strong>the</strong> only possible form<strong>of</strong> relation. The materiality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>puppet</strong> <strong>as</strong> an object is at <strong>the</strong> heart <strong>of</strong> this researchbecause it only represents an O<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> representational actuality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> performance.The ontological dualism presented by Sartre in Being and Nothingness, first publishedin 1943, allows me to examine <strong>the</strong> particularity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>puppet</strong> through its ontologicalambiguity. I fur<strong>the</strong>r develop below <strong>the</strong> re<strong>as</strong>ons for looking at Sartre and Levin<strong>as</strong>, <strong>as</strong>well <strong>as</strong> for capitalising <strong>the</strong> word ‘O<strong>the</strong>r’.1.2. Research itineraryThe mode <strong>of</strong> inquiry <strong>of</strong> this study is framed by Practice-<strong>as</strong>-Research through <strong>the</strong> setting<strong>of</strong> a dialogue between practice and <strong>the</strong>ory. The aim is to understand how manipulactinginherently engages with representations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> co-presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!