master planning and urban sprawl - Northeast Florida Regional ...
master planning and urban sprawl - Northeast Florida Regional ...
master planning and urban sprawl - Northeast Florida Regional ...
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MASTER PLANNINGANDURBAN SPRAWLNORTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COUNCILAUGUST 7, 2008
Location
Branan Field Master PlanBegan in 1998 with Branan Field RoadFunding (Pre‐Beltway)Anticipated Growth Pressures Resultingfrom New RoadBCC Recognized Need to Plan in Advanceof Road ConstructionFunded Study for Development of Plan
Branan Field Master PlanAt onset, area ranged in densities from1 unit per 5 acres to 16 units per acre.3000+ existing l<strong>and</strong>owners <strong>and</strong>residents.
Branan Field Master Plan
Lake Asbury Master PlanBegan in April 2000Anticipated Growth Pressures Associated withOuter BeltwayContinued Piecemeal Development Along CR739 <strong>and</strong> Henley Road
Lake Asbury Master PlanOriginally comprised of Agriculture l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong>existing residential development surroundingthe lakes.Densities ranged from one unit per 20 acres to3 units per acre.Vacant l<strong>and</strong> in large l<strong>and</strong>holdings.
Lake Asbury Master Plan
General Master Planning Process• Five Years (Minimum)• Mailed Notices to all Property Owners• Education of Existing Residents• Design Charettes• Community Consensus• Adoption of Plan <strong>and</strong> Implementing LDRs
Positives• Long‐Term Consensus Plans for 50,000 Acres• DCA Embraced Approach• Preservation of Wetl<strong>and</strong> Systems <strong>and</strong> Upl<strong>and</strong> Wildlife HabitatExceeding Permitting St<strong>and</strong>ards• Planned Internal Roadway Network to Provide EfficientConnectivity to Major Roadway Network• 5% Adequate Public Facilities Requirement• Provision of Central Services for all Developments (1 unit per 2acres <strong>and</strong> above)• Win‐Win Trade‐off: Higher Density for Higher Design St<strong>and</strong>ards
Positives• Design St<strong>and</strong>ards:Clustering/Preservation of Open SpaceGrid Street Patterns <strong>and</strong> Connectivity to Create WalkableCommunitiesNeighborhood Parks within 1,200 feet of Each ResidenceArchitectural, L<strong>and</strong>scaping <strong>and</strong> Lighting St<strong>and</strong>ards forNonresidential DevelopmentSigns – Monument Signs Integrated into DesignMix of Uses/Activity Centers – Reduction of VMTs
Negatives• Lengthy Process From Inception to Adoption• Labor Intensive ‐ Wide Range of Interests Buying into SingleVision <strong>and</strong> Plan• Subset of Comp Plan <strong>and</strong> LDRs adds Complexity toImplementation Process• Higher Design St<strong>and</strong>ards = $$, Objections from Developers,(Especially National Franchises)• Psychiatric Help for Development Facilitator
Indicators of Urban Sprawl• Promotes development of low‐intensity, low‐density or single‐usedevelopments.• Allows development to occur in rural areas at substantial distances fromexisting <strong>urban</strong> areas while leaping over undeveloped l<strong>and</strong>s.• Allows <strong>urban</strong> development in radial strip patterns.• Fails to adequately protect <strong>and</strong> conserve natural resources.• Fails to maximize the use of public facilities <strong>and</strong> services.• Fails to encourage an attractive <strong>and</strong> functional mix of uses.• Results in loss of significant amounts of functional open space.
Was it worth the effort?
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Holly ParrishClay County Engineering Division(904) 529‐3819holly.parrish@co.clay.fl.us