03.12.2012 Views

FOA - Entrepreneurship in the Family Office.pdf - Summitas

FOA - Entrepreneurship in the Family Office.pdf - Summitas

FOA - Entrepreneurship in the Family Office.pdf - Summitas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Entrepreneurship</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Office</strong><br />

While <strong>the</strong>se options can also be attractive, <strong>the</strong>y all represent various<br />

degrees of separation from what is ultimately creat<strong>in</strong>g value, which<br />

are <strong>the</strong> enterprises receiv<strong>in</strong>g capital. The far<strong>the</strong>r from <strong>the</strong> value<br />

creation we go, <strong>the</strong> more people <strong>the</strong>re are along <strong>the</strong> way to take<br />

a piece.<br />

Conversely, as you move closer to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial value creation <strong>in</strong> a<br />

company, returns can <strong>in</strong>crease. For example, several studies show<br />

that a well diversified portfolio of direct angel <strong>in</strong>vestments is<br />

expected to earn 27%. 1 Few families take advantage of <strong>the</strong> returns<br />

from angel <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g as it is often misunderstood, time <strong>in</strong>tensive<br />

and difficult to do directly, and few choices exist to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong>directly.<br />

This is chang<strong>in</strong>g however as new seed stage <strong>in</strong>vestment managers<br />

are develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative strategies to achieve diversified returns<br />

of over 30% while provid<strong>in</strong>g access to early stage companies for<br />

larger <strong>in</strong>vestors (a topic for ano<strong>the</strong>r paper).<br />

While <strong>the</strong>se returns are attractive, <strong>the</strong>y can be even higher when<br />

you cont<strong>in</strong>ue to move closer to <strong>the</strong> source of value creation and<br />

actually found <strong>the</strong> enterprise <strong>in</strong>ternally. To illustrate, by <strong>the</strong> time<br />

angel <strong>in</strong>vestors purchase equity <strong>in</strong> a pre-revenue company, <strong>the</strong><br />

typical pre-money valuation is between $1 and $2 million. 2 An<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment of $100k <strong>in</strong> a company with a $1.5 million pre-money<br />

valuation will result <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SFO receiv<strong>in</strong>g 6.25% ownership <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

company (.1m/1.5m+.1m). Startup companies will typically raise<br />

enough to give away only 30-35% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir first round of f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

However, many of <strong>the</strong>se companies (not only <strong>in</strong>ternet) will have<br />

spent less than $100k to get to this po<strong>in</strong>t. Their $100k has earned<br />

<strong>the</strong>m 65-70%, while yours will earn you 6.25%. You would have to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vest $100k <strong>in</strong> ten more companies to achieve <strong>the</strong> same level of<br />

ownership as <strong>the</strong> founders, risk<strong>in</strong>g 10x more capital.<br />

What is <strong>the</strong> entrepreneurs’ response to this? Their response<br />

(correctly) is that <strong>the</strong>ir capital and time went <strong>in</strong> when this was just<br />

an idea- <strong>the</strong>ir idea, and when no one was sure it would work. Your<br />

capital goes <strong>in</strong> when th<strong>in</strong>gs are much fur<strong>the</strong>r along - <strong>the</strong>re may be<br />

a product developed, a great team, and maybe some customers<br />

or revenue. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> founders reduced risk and created<br />

value with <strong>the</strong>ir work and creative <strong>in</strong>sight. (They will also spend<br />

<strong>the</strong> next four years build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> company, but <strong>the</strong> market shows<br />

that management can be brought <strong>in</strong> for <strong>the</strong> same salary and much<br />

less equity once a company has fund<strong>in</strong>g, which implies <strong>the</strong> bulk of<br />

founder’s equity is due to founder status).<br />

1 Robert Wiltbank, “Returns to Angel Investors <strong>in</strong> Groups”, Kauffman Foundation, November 2007, Right<br />

Side Capital Management, LLC, “Historical Returns <strong>in</strong> Angel Markets”, 2010<br />

2 Payne, Bill, “Valuation of Pre-Revenue Angel Deals”, October, 2010<br />

<strong>Family</strong><strong>Office</strong>Association.com<br />

returns

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!