13.07.2015 Views

Gorer v Lever - National Museums Liverpool

Gorer v Lever - National Museums Liverpool

Gorer v Lever - National Museums Liverpool

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

een made as per the Agreement. 60 <strong>Lever</strong> responded by explaining that his letterwas intended to be the earliest intimation that he was going to exercise his rightafter the fourth instalment to be relieved of the Collection. 61 In quick succession,<strong>Lever</strong> made his third and fourth instalments, the fourth instalment beingaccompanied by an instruction to sell the whole of the Collection. 62On 8 th July, 1912, <strong>Gorer</strong> initiated legal proceedings against <strong>Lever</strong>: ‘Having regardto your specific statements that you had not purchased the Collection you haveas our Client has pointed out in the course of his correspondence with you, soseriously prejudiced his position as to forfeit the right to call upon him to sell theCollection and he has instructed us to institute proceedings.’ 63 The Counselengaged were two legal heavyweights: F. E. Smith (later Lord Birkenhead) actingfor <strong>Lever</strong> and Sir Edward Carson, who had made his reputation in the notoriousOscar Wilde case in 1895, for <strong>Gorer</strong>. However, at the eleventh hour on 19 th April,1913, Edgar <strong>Gorer</strong> withdrew his action, although custody of the Collection prior toits re­sale was a matter for the courts to decide and Mr. Justice Darling found in<strong>Gorer</strong>’s favour. 64 It was at this moment that, through his solicitors, <strong>Lever</strong>requested that he be allowed to select a portion of the collection for retention,which <strong>Gorer</strong> agreed to. 65 Fifty­one items were retained by <strong>Lever</strong>, the value ofwhich amounted to the £55,000 <strong>Lever</strong> had already paid in instalments. <strong>Gorer</strong>60<strong>Gorer</strong> to <strong>Lever</strong>, 16 February, 1912, <strong>Gorer</strong> Papers.61<strong>Lever</strong> to <strong>Gorer</strong>, 27 February, 1912, <strong>Gorer</strong> Papers.62The third instalment was made on 4 April, the fourth on 4 July, 1912.63Harris, Chetham & Cohen, Solicitors, to <strong>Lever</strong>, 8 July, 1912, <strong>Gorer</strong> Papers.64‘Law Reports, May 23: Summary of the Day’s Cases’ The Times, 23 May, 1913 p.37 and‘The King’s Bench Division: The Richard Bennett Collection, <strong>Gorer</strong> v <strong>Lever</strong>’, The Times, 24 May,1913, p.37.65Simpson North Harley & Co., to <strong>Gorer</strong>, 24 May, 1913; <strong>Gorer</strong> agreed on 3 June, <strong>Gorer</strong>Papers.22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!