* ... a very curious agreement in the name which the Jews <strong>and</strong> the Mexicans applied to the poles<strong>of</strong> the earth. The Mexicans, as we are informed by Sahgun, in the third <strong>and</strong> eighth chapters <strong>of</strong> hisninth book <strong>of</strong> History <strong>of</strong> New Spain, named the north <strong>and</strong> south poles the left <strong>and</strong> right h<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>earth, <strong>and</strong> the leatned Capellus, in his dissertation on the ground plan <strong>and</strong> architecture <strong>of</strong> theTemple <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem, which Bishop Walton has prefixed to the first volume <strong>of</strong> his polyglot Bible,affirms that the Jews gave the same name to the poles. VIII 256 Supplement* And Malvenda says, that the natives <strong>of</strong> St. Michael had tombstones, which the Spaniards diggedup, with several ancient Hebrew characters upon them, as, "Why is God gone away?" <strong>and</strong> "He isdead, God, knows." VIII 373 Supplement* (Chronicle <strong>of</strong> the Order <strong>of</strong> Saint Agustine in Peru) ... Two other stones containing inscriptionsin Hebrew <strong>and</strong> Greek letters, are stated by Colancha, on the authority <strong>of</strong> Brother Raymond Urtadoto have existed in the neighborhood. VIII 25* The strongest argument, however, ... is the confession <strong>of</strong> Montezuma <strong>and</strong> his nobles, one <strong>and</strong> allto Cortes - that their ancestors had come from the same part <strong>of</strong> the globe as the Spaniards,situated towards the rising sun. VI 53* The interpretter <strong>of</strong> the paintings contained in the larger Vatican M.S. ... instancing this <strong>and</strong>other traits <strong>of</strong> resemblance between the Mexicans <strong>and</strong> Jews ... adds, "<strong>From</strong> all thesecircumstances the fact is plain <strong>and</strong> probable, that this nation descended from the Jews ... VI 65
TwoSwine* (Adair reported )"When the English traders have been making sausages mixt with hog's blood, Iobserved the Indians to cast their eyes upon them with the horror <strong>of</strong> their reputed forefathers, when theyviewed the predicted abomination <strong>of</strong> desolation fulfilled by Antiochus in defiling the Temple ..." VIII157* Adair also remarks ... that the Indians entertained the same degree <strong>of</strong> abhorrence for the flesh <strong>of</strong> swineas the Jews; <strong>and</strong> this double analogy in the arbitrary association <strong>of</strong> ideas <strong>of</strong> pollution with blood <strong>and</strong>eating the flesh <strong>of</strong> swine, increases in much more than a tw<strong>of</strong>old ratio the probability that the Indiansderived their notions <strong>of</strong> uncleanliness from the Jews, <strong>and</strong> were deeply imbued with all the prejudices <strong>of</strong>the Old Law .... VIII 157* Having noticed their division <strong>of</strong> animals into clean <strong>and</strong> unclean,- under which latter denominationthey included hogs, wolves, panthers, foxes, cats, mice, rats, moles, <strong>and</strong> even the beaver, only exceptingthe bear from prohibition which Moses laid in the eleventh chapter <strong>of</strong> Leviticus on eating any <strong>of</strong> thespecies <strong>of</strong> animals here enumerated ... VIII 157* ... since Gumilla declares ... that the Indians <strong>of</strong> the Oronoco were circumcised, <strong>and</strong> held the flesh <strong>of</strong>swine in extreme abhorence ... VIII 159* The extreme aversion which the North American Indians felt for swine, <strong>and</strong> the opprobrious term <strong>of</strong>Shukapa, or swine eaters, which they bestowed on Europeans because they perceived that ate the flesh<strong>of</strong> that animal, have already been noticed by Adair in the twefth Argument <strong>of</strong> his treatise on the descent<strong>of</strong> the American Indians from the Jews. Whether, however, the fact <strong>of</strong> no mention being made by anySpanish authors <strong>of</strong> the flesh <strong>of</strong> the pecari, or Mexican hog, being eaten by the Mexicans, or that animalbeing domesticated among them or sacrificed in their temples, or even <strong>of</strong>fered as provision to theSpanish soldiers, before whom they placed all other kinds <strong>of</strong> food when on the marches through theircountry, can be a considered a negative pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Mexicans entertaining the same aversion for swineas the more northern Indian tribes, we shall leave it to others to detirmine. VI 236* Du Tetre, an old French author, who published a General History <strong>of</strong> the Isl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> St Christopher,Guadeloupe <strong>and</strong> Martinique, in the year 1654, remarks in the third section <strong>of</strong> the first chapter <strong>of</strong> thefifth part <strong>of</strong> that work, that the Indians, either <strong>of</strong> all or some <strong>of</strong> these isl<strong>and</strong>s, abstained from eating theflesh <strong>of</strong> swine, <strong>and</strong> also many kinds <strong>of</strong> fish when it is recollected that the group <strong>of</strong> isl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> which thethree above mentioned formed a portion were originally inhabited by the Caribs ... <strong>and</strong> that they werepeopled from the adjacent continent, <strong>and</strong> by the tribes dwelling in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Orinoco, this fact willnot appear so extraordinary; ... VIII 159* ... the Mexicans in their dress, in the domestic economy <strong>of</strong> their house (which had flat ro<strong>of</strong>s orterraces like those <strong>of</strong> the Jews), in their mode <strong>of</strong> receiving guests <strong>and</strong> saluting strangers, in their respectfor the old (rising up on their approach), <strong>and</strong> in the pains which they bestowed on the education <strong>of</strong> theirchildren ... strongly remind us <strong>of</strong> the Jews VI 276* It is evident, from the passage <strong>of</strong> Exodus (29:6) ... that the holy crown was distinct from the mitre: itconsisted <strong>of</strong> a plate <strong>of</strong> gold, that was tied with a blue lace over the mitre ... it says, in the thirty-sixth <strong>and</strong>following verses <strong>of</strong> the same chapter: "And thou shalt make a plate <strong>of</strong> pure gold, <strong>and</strong> grave upon it, likethe engravings <strong>of</strong> a signet, Holiness to the Lord. And thou shalt put it on blue lace, that it may be uponthe mitre; upon the forefront <strong>of</strong> the mitre it shall be. And it shall be upon Aaron's forehead ..."