<strong>Kosovo</strong> Serb pupils due to perceived lack of security <strong>and</strong> parents’ concerns that <strong>Kosovo</strong>education may limit <strong>the</strong> possibility of pursuing education outside <strong>Kosovo</strong>.Primary education in Janjevë/Janjevo illustrates fur<strong>the</strong>r paradoxes of co-habitation. Theschool has three different directors <strong>and</strong> names. The Serbian curriculum director calls it”Vladimir Nazor’; <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> Croat director calls it “Janjevo;” <strong>the</strong> Lipjan/Lipljanmunicipality <strong>and</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanian director call it “Shtefan Gjeqovi.” The <strong>Kosovo</strong> Croatdirector is appointed by <strong>the</strong> municipality but pupils of this community attend Serbiancurriculumeducation. <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanian, Ashkali <strong>and</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> Turk students receiveeducation in Albanian on one floor; <strong>Kosovo</strong> Croat, <strong>Kosovo</strong> Bosniak, <strong>and</strong> Roma studentsreceive education in Serbian on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r.A relatively positive example comes from <strong>the</strong> elementary schools of Mogila/Mogille <strong>and</strong>Binač/Bincë (Viti/Vitina), where some classes of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> <strong>and</strong> Serbian educationalsystems share <strong>the</strong> school building during <strong>the</strong> same shift. In Poneš/Ponesh (Gjilan/Gnjilane)<strong>and</strong> Jasenovik (Novobërdë/Novo Brdo), schools operating under <strong>the</strong> two different systemsshare <strong>the</strong> same building although in different shifts. Space allocation arrangements disable orenable <strong>the</strong> possibility of interaction between students. For instance, in <strong>the</strong> Poneš/Poneshschool <strong>the</strong>re is a break of 45 minutes between <strong>the</strong> two shifts, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> students of <strong>the</strong>different <strong>communities</strong> do not meet. In Jasenovik, 15 to 30 minutes of break between shiftsallows some interaction between students, especially in summer when <strong>the</strong>y practice sportstoge<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> school yard.The satellite elementary school of “P<strong>and</strong>eli Sotiri” in <strong>the</strong> Plemetinë/Plemetina temporarycommunity shelter (Obiliq/Obilić), represents an example of poor quality <strong>and</strong> segregatededucation attended exclusively by Roma <strong>and</strong> Ashkali pupils, who receive tuition from underqualifiedteachers. The construction of a new school in <strong>the</strong> same village is expected to enable<strong>the</strong> integration of <strong>the</strong>se students with <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanian students in <strong>the</strong> forthcoming schoolyear. In 2008 two previously classrooms catering exclusively for 53 Ashkali, Egyptian <strong>and</strong>Roma pupils were already successfully integrated in <strong>the</strong> multiethnic <strong>primary</strong> school “SelmanRiza” in Fushë Kosovë/<strong>Kosovo</strong> Polje.In some cases, <strong>the</strong> mere fact of sharing <strong>the</strong> same school or class does not mean thatintegration is achieved. In Ferizaj/Uroševac, Ashkali respondents have highlighted how, insome cases, during <strong>the</strong> winter, students of <strong>the</strong>ir community are being placed in seats far from<strong>the</strong> stove <strong>and</strong> close to <strong>the</strong> window. Outside <strong>the</strong> school, <strong>the</strong>y are often bullied, addressed in aderogatory manner or even beaten up by <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanian students. After a series of recentalleged beatings by <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanian students, 73 Ashkali parents appear increasingly afraidof sending <strong>the</strong>ir children to school.4. PRESENTATION OF KOSOVO COMMUNITIES WITHIN TEXTBOOKSIn consonance with <strong>the</strong> Council of Europe Framework Convention for <strong>the</strong> Protection ofNational Minorities, 74 <strong>the</strong> applied legislation on <strong>the</strong> rights of <strong>communities</strong> requires that <strong>the</strong><strong>Kosovo</strong> educational curriculum cover <strong>the</strong> history, culture <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r attributes of <strong>communities</strong>traditionally present in <strong>Kosovo</strong> <strong>and</strong> foster a spirit of respect, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> tolerance73 A rapid succession of incidents of assault allegedly took place on 10 February, 1 <strong>and</strong> 3 March 2009.74 Article 6.1 of <strong>the</strong> Framework Convention for <strong>the</strong> Protection of National Minorities provides that authorities:“[s]hall encourage a spirit of tolerance <strong>and</strong> intercultural dialogue <strong>and</strong> take effective measures to promote mutualrespect <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> co-operation among all persons living on <strong>the</strong>ir territory, irrespective of thosepersons' ethnic, cultural, linguistic or religious identity, in particular in <strong>the</strong> fields of education, culture <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>media.”17
among all of <strong>the</strong>m. 75 It also provides that <strong>communities</strong>’ representative organizations beconsulted during <strong>the</strong> development of such curricula. In practice, in a post-conflictenvironment, <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>and</strong> practices of two separate school systems is not conducive to<strong>the</strong> creation of a system of inter-cultural education where <strong>the</strong> identity of each group ispreserved, <strong>the</strong> identity of o<strong>the</strong>r groups is learned <strong>and</strong> acknowledged, <strong>and</strong> mutualunderst<strong>and</strong>ing, acceptance <strong>and</strong> tolerance is promoted. Conflicting historical representationstend to prioritize ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanian or <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> Serb community. They do not orinsufficiently accommodate <strong>the</strong> specific histories of o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>communities</strong>. The lack ofcommunity-specific “national” subjects <strong>and</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r tongue classes for some of <strong>the</strong> mostvulnerable <strong>communities</strong> (Roma, Ashkali, Egyptians, Gorani, <strong>Kosovo</strong> Croats, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong>Montenegrins) impedes adequate preservation of <strong>the</strong>ir identities.Separation <strong>and</strong> conflict over authorityThe reality in <strong>Kosovo</strong> is characterised by social, political <strong>and</strong> administrative separationbetween <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanian <strong>and</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> Serb <strong>communities</strong>. Separation <strong>and</strong> conflict overauthority became even more pronounced after 17 February 2008. In <strong>the</strong> education field, <strong>the</strong>existence of two separate, divergent <strong>and</strong> often competing school systems is not conducive topromoting “underst<strong>and</strong>ing, tolerance <strong>and</strong> friendship among nations, racial or religiousgroups” or “contributing to <strong>the</strong> maintenance of peace”, as enshrined in <strong>the</strong> UniversalDeclaration of Human Rights <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> International Covenant on Economic, Social <strong>and</strong>Cultural Rights. 76 As previously explained, <strong>Kosovo</strong> Serb students attend schools financed<strong>and</strong> managed by <strong>the</strong> Serbian Ministry of Education, while <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanian students attendschools maintained by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> Ministry of Education. Overall, smaller <strong>communities</strong> tendto gravitate towards ei<strong>the</strong>r curricula depending chiefly on <strong>the</strong>ir geographical location <strong>and</strong>, toa lesser extent, on language <strong>and</strong>/or religion. Those who live <strong>within</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> Serb enclavesfollow <strong>the</strong> Serbian curriculum, while o<strong>the</strong>rs will normally follow <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> curriculum.The two educational systems have, in fact, contributed to entrench <strong>the</strong> chasm which divides<strong>communities</strong> in <strong>Kosovo</strong>. That both <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanian <strong>and</strong> Serbian textbooks tend to present aslanted <strong>and</strong> one-sided view of history is a case in point. They do not confine <strong>the</strong>mselves topresent a history of <strong>Kosovo</strong>, but tend to be more geared toward presenting <strong>the</strong> history ofei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Albanian or <strong>the</strong> Serb community. <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanian history school books focus onethnic Albanian protagonists, while Slavs are said to have come to “Albanian l<strong>and</strong>s” where<strong>the</strong>y fought, pillaged, destroyed <strong>and</strong> assimilated proto-Albanian tribes (except in <strong>Kosovo</strong> <strong>and</strong>Albania). 77 Serbian textbooks present <strong>Kosovo</strong> as <strong>the</strong> “Cradle of <strong>the</strong> Serbian Nation” <strong>and</strong>underline that <strong>Kosovo</strong> Albanians have come from Albania. 78 In both curricula, both ethnic<strong>communities</strong>’ histories are presented as a long enduring sequence of oppression <strong>and</strong> nationalstruggle to break away from <strong>the</strong> Ottoman Empire. According to <strong>the</strong> version of history taughtin <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kosovo</strong> curriculum, <strong>the</strong> oppression of <strong>the</strong> Albanian people <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir national struggle 7975 Art. 8.12, 2008 Law on <strong>the</strong> Rights of Communities.76 Article 26, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948; Art. 13.1, International Covenant on Economic,Social <strong>and</strong> Cultural Rights; General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education, Art. 13.4, Committee onEconomic, Social <strong>and</strong> Cultural Rights, Twenty-first session (1999).77 Fehmi Rexhepi & Frasher Demaj, 2006, Historia 6, Libri Shkollor Prishtinë/Priština, p. 113-4.78 Suzana Rajić, Kosta Nikolić & Nebojša Jovanović, 2005, Istoria 8: Za 8 Razred Osnovne Škole, Stampa“Kultura” Baćki Petrovac, p. 27 & 134-5.79 “Freedoms <strong>and</strong> political rights promised by <strong>the</strong> young Turks did not last for long. After <strong>the</strong>y established <strong>the</strong>irauthority, <strong>the</strong>y started actions against <strong>the</strong> national Albanian movement. Young Turks started to createobstacles to Albanian schools <strong>and</strong> cultural clubs, to arrest Albanian patriots etc. These actions as well astaxes <strong>and</strong> military service raised <strong>the</strong> anger of <strong>the</strong> Albanian population against <strong>the</strong> regime of <strong>the</strong> young Turks… Under-cover Albanian committees started <strong>the</strong>ir attempts to organize general armed uprising against <strong>the</strong>Ottomans. At <strong>the</strong> beginning of April 1910 uprising erupted in <strong>the</strong> Prishtinë region. It spread quickly to o<strong>the</strong>r18