13.07.2015 Views

SELECTED CHAPTERS FROM ALGEBRA I. R. Shafarevich Preface

SELECTED CHAPTERS FROM ALGEBRA I. R. Shafarevich Preface

SELECTED CHAPTERS FROM ALGEBRA I. R. Shafarevich Preface

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40 I. R. <strong>Shafarevich</strong>bility will be between 148 000 and 152 000 (since 3 4 n = 150 000, n 1100 = 2000,np ; n" = 148 000, np + n" = 152 000).Conversely, using Chebyshev's theorem we can estimate the number of experimentsto be made in order to obtain the probability p accurately enough. Supposethat we want to determine it with accuracy up to 1=10 and that the probability itis equal to the obtained number is not less than 0,99. According to Chebyshev'stheorem we have toput" =1=10 and to use the inequality; 110pq 2 n < 001:Notice that q =1;p, and for any p such that 0 6 p 6 1, wehave pq = p(1;p) 6 1=4.This follows from the fact that the geometric mean is not greater than the arithmeticmean of the numbers p, q, whichis1=2. Therefore, it is enough that n should satisfythe inequality14; 110 2 n < 001which implies n>2500.Problems1. In the set of some objects, 95% of them have a certain property. Prove thatamong 200 000 objects, the number of those which have thisproperty isbetween189 000 and 191 000 with probability not less than 0,99.2. Modify Problem 1 so that the portion of objects which have a certainproperty isnotknown. What is the probability that after testing 100 objects wecan determine it with accuracy up to 0,1?3. For any positive integer r 6 n nd the sum of all termsk(k ; 1)(k ; r +1)p(A k )for k =1 ...n.4. For r 6 4 evaluate the sums r consisting of terms k r p(A k ) for all k =0 1 2 3 4. Do this in two dierent ways: a) by the reasoning of the proof of theLemma, and b) by expressing the sums r in terms of sums evaluated in Problem 3for r =1 2 3 4.5. Try to improve the inequality (4) in Chebyshev's theorem, applying the k ; np 4 kfactorinstead of; np 2.The improvement will be that n2 willn"n"appear in the denominator of the right-hand side of the inequality instead of n.I. R. <strong>Shafarevich</strong>,Russian Academy of Sciences,Moscow, Russia

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!