4. Perspectives on the Evolution of European Social Policy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

40ReferencesAdema, W. and Ladaique, M.(2009), How Expensive is theWelfare State? Gross and NetIndicators in the OECD SocialExpenditure Database (SOCX),OECD Social, Employment andMigration Working Papers No92. Brussels: OECD Publishing.Alber, J. and Standing, G. (2000),‘Social Dumping, Catch-upor Convergence? Europe in aComparative Global Context’,Journal of European Social Policy,10 (2), 99-109.Baquero Cruz, J. (2005), ‘BeyondCompetition: Services ofGeneral Interest and EuropeanCommunity Law’ in De Búrca,G. (Ed.) EU Law and the WelfareState: In Search of Solidarity,Oxford: Oxford University Press.Bertola, G., Marimon, R.,Pissarides, C. (2000), ‘WelfareSystems and Labour Marketsin Europe: What ConvergenceBefore and After EMU?’ inBertola, G., Boeri, T. andNicoletti, G. (Ed.) Welfare andEmployment in a United Europe,Massachusetts: MassachusettsInstitute of Technology.Church, C. and Phinnemore, A.(2007), ‘The Rise and Fall of theConstitutional Treaty’ in Cini,M. (Ed.) European Union Politics,Second Edition, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press. 46-65Citi, M. and Rhodes, M. (2006),‘New Modes of Governancein the European Union: ACritical Survey and Analysis’ inJorgensen, K.E., Pollack, M.A. andRosamond, B. (Ed.) Handbook ofEuropean Union Politics, London:Sage Publications. 463-482Davesne, A. (2009), The LavalCase and the Future of LabourRelations in Sweden, Centred’Etudes Européennes, Paris:SciencesPo.De Búrca, G. (2010), ‘Stumblinginto Experimentalism: The EUanti-Discrimination Regime’in Sabel, C.F. and Zeitlin, J. (Ed.)Experimentalist Governance inthe European Union, Oxford:Oxford University Press.Eichhorst, W. and Konle-Seidl, R. (2008), ContingentConvergence: A ComparativeAnalysis of Activation Policies,IZA Discussion Paper 3905.Bonn: Institute for the Studyof Labor (IZA).Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie,D., Hemerijck, A. and Myles, J.(2001), A Welfare Architecturefor Europe?, Report Submittedto the Belgian Presidency ofthe European Union. Brussels:European Union.European Commission (2004),White Paper on Services ofGeneral Interest, Com 37<strong>4.</strong>Brussels: European Commission.European Commission (2005),Working Together for Growthand Jobs: A New Start for theLisbon Strategy, Com 24 2February, Brussels: EuropeanCommission.Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M.and Leiber, S. (2005), Complyingwith Europe: EU Harmonizationand Soft Law in the MemberStates, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity PressFerrera, M. (2005), TheBoundaries of Welfare, Oxford.Oxford University Press,Ferrera, M. (2009 ), ‘NationalWelfare States and EuropeanIntegration: In Search of a“Virtuous Nesting”’, Journal ofCommon Market Studies, 47 (2),219-233.Ferrara, M. and Sacchi, S. (2009),‘A More Social EU? Issues ofwhere and how’ in Micossi, S.and Tosato, G. (Ed.) Europe inthe 21st Century: <strong>Perspectives</strong>from the Lisbon Treaty, Brussels:Centre for European PolicyStudies.Hatzopoulos, V. (2008), ‘LegalAspect of the Internal Marketfor Services’ in Pelkmans, J., Hanf,D. and Chang, M. (Ed.) The EUInternal Market in a ComparativePerspective, College of EuropeanStudies. Brussels: PIE Peter Lang.Hemerijck, A. (2002), ‘The Self-Transformation of the EuropeanSocial Model’ in Esping-Andersen, G. (Ed.) Why we needa new Welfare State, Oxford:Oxford University Press.Hemerijck, A.C. (2007), ‘Troddenand Untrodden Paths in ‘SocialEurope’. On the InstitutionalRelationship Between theNational Welfare State and theProcess of European Integration’,Presentation UnpublishedInaugural Lecture,Hemerijck, A. (2008), ‘WelfareRecalibration as Social Learning’,Presentation to ESPAnetDoctoral Researcher Workshop,University of Bologna, 5-7 June.Hervey, T. (2007), ‘EU Lawand National Health Policies:Problem or Opportunity’, HealthEconomics, Policy and Law, 2 (1),1-6.Hix, S. (2005), The PoliticalSystem of the European Union,London: Palgrave Macmillan.Hunt, J. and Shaw, J. (2009), ‘FairyTale of Luxembourg? Reflectionson Law and Legal Scholarshipin European Integration’ inPhinnemore, D. and Warleigh-Lack, A. (Ed.) Reflections onEuropean Integration: 50years of the Treaty of Rome,Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Kilpatrick, C. (2009), ‘Laval’sRegulatory Conundrum:Collective Standard-Setting andthe Court’s New Approach toPosted Workers ‘, European LawReview, 34 (6), 844-865.Kok, W. (2004), Facing theChallenge: The Lisbon Strategyfor Growth and Employment,Report from the High LevelGroup Chaired by Wim Kok.Brussels: European Commission.Kvist, J. and Saari, J. (2007),The Europeanisation of SocialProtection, Bristol: Policy Press.
41Leibfried, S. (2005), ‘Social Policy:Left to the Judges and theMarkets?’ in Wallace, H., Wallace,W. and Pollack, M.A. (Ed.) Policy-Making in the European UnionFifth Edition, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press. 243-278Mangan, I. (1993), ‘The Influenceof EC Membership on Irish SocialPolicy and Social Services’ inO’Cinneide, S. (Ed.) Social Europe:EC Social Policy and Ireland,Dublin: Institute of EuropeanAffairs.NESC (2005a), TheDevelopmental Welfare State,Dublin National Economic andSocial Council.NESC (2005b), NESC Strategy2006: People, Productivityand Purpose, Dublin NationalEconomic and Social Council.NESC (2006), Migration Policy,Dublin: National Economic andSocial Council.O’Donnell, R. and Moss, B. (2005),‘Ireland: The Very Idea of anOpen Method of Coordination’in Zeitlin, J., Pochet, P. andMagnusson, L (Ed.) The OpenMethod of Co-ordinationin Action: The EuropeanEmployment and Social InclusionStrategies, Brussels: PIE PeterLang.O’Leary, S. (2005), ‘Solidarity andCitizenship Rights’ in De Búrca,G. (Ed.) EU Law and the WelfareState: in Search of Solidarity,Oxford: Oxford University Press.Pelkmans, J. (2007), How Socialis European Integration, BrugesEuropean Economic PolicyBriefing No 18. Bruges: Collegeof Europe.Rhodes, M. (2005), ‘EmploymentPolicy - Between Efficiency andExperimentation’ in Wallace,H., Wallace, W. and Pollack,M.A. (Ed.) Policy-Making in theEuropean Union, Fifth Edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.279-304Rodrigues, M. (2009), ‘On theEuropean Innovation Policy:Key Issues for Policy-Making’in Rodrigues, M. (Ed.) Europe,Globalisation and the LisbonAgenda, Cheltenham: EdwardElgar.Sabel, C.F. and Gerstenberg,O. (2010), ‘Constitutionalisingan Overlapping Consensus:The ECJ and the Emergence ofa Coordinate ConstitutionalOrder’, European Law Journal, 16(5), 511-550.Sauter, W. (2008), The ProposedPatient Mobility Directive andthe Reform of Cross BorderHealthcare in the EU, TILECDiscussion Paper DP 2008-03<strong>4.</strong>Tilburg: Tilburg University.Tayor-Gooby, P. (2002), ‘TheSilver age of he Welfare State:<strong>Perspectives</strong> on Resilience’,Journal of Social Policy, 31 (4),597-621.Walker, N. (2010), ‘The Anti-Political Polity’, Modern LawReview, 73 ( ), 141-15<strong>4.</strong>Wilding, P. (2002), ‘Review:Welfare States Under Pressure’,Journal of Social Policy, 31 (4),753-778.Wolf, H. (2002), Globalizationand the Convergence of SocialExpenditure in the EuropeanUnion, Occasional SeriesPaper. Washington: GeorgeWashington Center for theStudy of Globalization.Yeates, N. (2007), ‘Globalisationand Social Policy’ in Boaldock, A.,Manning, N. and Vickerstaff, S.(Ed.) Social Policy, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Zahn, R. (2008), The Viking andLaval Cases in the Context ofEuropean Enlargement, WebJournal of Current Legal Issues.10 Nov 2010, http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2008/issue3/pdf/zahn3.pdfZeitlin, J. (2005), ‘The OpenMethod of Co-ordination inQuestion’ in Zeitlin, J. andPochet, P. with Magnusson, L.(Ed.) The Open Method of Coordinationin Action, Brussels:P.I.E.-Peter Lang.Zeitlin, J. and Pochet, P. withMagnusson, L. (Ed.) (2005), TheOpen Method of Co-ordinationin Action: The EuropeanEmployment and Social InclusionStrategies, Brussels: P.I.E.-PeterLang.
Page 1: ackground paper4.
Page 4 and 5: Table of ContentsBackground Paper 4
Page 6 and 7: 64backgroundThe Provision paperof S
Page 8 and 9: expenditure but rather to a recalib
Page 10 and 11: 4.2.1 Toward a Soc
Page 12 and 13: in conjunction with the completion
Page 14 and 15: 4.2.2 The Lisbon S
Page 16 and 17: 10and social exclusion, as well as
Page 18 and 19: 12s Agreed common objectives at EU
Page 20 and 21: 14enforceable rights applicable to
Page 22 and 23: 164.3 Sovereignty
Page 24 and 25: 18assistance eligibility and reside
Page 26 and 27: 20it is subject to competition rule
Page 28 and 29: 226. The health area is a first and
Page 30 and 31: 24Across (Adema & Ladaique) countri
Page 32 and 33: 26from a reactive, corrective, comp
Page 34 and 35: 28Did this mean that measures that
Page 36 and 37: 30Figure 4.2 The E
Page 38 and 39: 32In portraying enlargement as prov
Page 40 and 41: 34Sabel and Gerstenberg (2010: 31)
Page 42 and 43: 36legal and social traditions. Of c
Page 44 and 45: 38process of liberalisation cannot

4. Perspectives on the Evolution of European Social Policy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?