Table 2.patients.Findings <strong>of</strong> published studies <strong>of</strong> liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) treatment in HIV-visceral leishmaniasis–coinfectedCountry Reference Study designSpain [35] Case series (relapseafter Sb V treatment)No. <strong>of</strong>subjectsTotal LAmBdose, mg/kg Regimen Initial response2 22.5 1.5 mg/kg per day <strong>for</strong>15 days21 1 mg/kg per day <strong>for</strong> 21daysGreece [36] Case series 2 40 1 mg/kg per day <strong>for</strong>days 1–7 and 1.5mg/kg per day <strong>for</strong>days 8–2920 0.75 mg/kg per day <strong>for</strong>days 1–7 and 1.5mg/kg per day <strong>for</strong>days 8–17Spain [37] Case series 5 40 4 mg/kg per day <strong>for</strong>days 1–5, 10, 17, 31,and 38Europe b [23] Open-label, dose-finding 11 29–39 100 mg per day <strong>for</strong> 21daysItaly [38] Open-label, dose-finding 10 40 4 mg/kg per day <strong>for</strong>days 1–5, 10, 17, 31,and 38France [39] Case series, secondaryprophylaxis5 60–86 by day 30 2.9–4.1 mg/kg per day<strong>for</strong> 5–24 days, followedby 2.7–3.8mg/kg every 15 daysto prevent relapseGood clinical response,parasite free at 3– 6months…Good clinical response;no relapse at 10–16months…Parasites cleared in80% <strong>of</strong> subjectsPartial clinical responsein 9 <strong>of</strong> 11 subjects;negative <strong>for</strong> parasitesat day 21Partial clinical responsein 7 <strong>of</strong> 8 subjects;negative <strong>for</strong> parasitesat day 453 <strong>of</strong> 5 subjects wererelapse free atmonths 13–22Relapserate, %0…0…40 a89 c88 d40 eNOTE. SB V , pentavalent antimonial drugs.a Relapses at 4 and 20 months.b Nine subjects from Italy, 1 from France, and 1 from Portugal.c Two deaths due to o<strong>the</strong>r causes, 8 relapses, and 1 cure.d Seven subjects experienced relapses at 2–7 months, 2 were lost to follow-up, and 1 was listed as “leishmanina positive.”e Two patients had relapse at 42 and 270 days and were re-treated with high-dose liposomal LAmB followed by prophylaxis, with good response in 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>2 patients.clusion <strong>of</strong> lower total doses in combination regimens. To file<strong>for</strong> an extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> preferential pricing scheme, figures detailing<strong>the</strong> projected annual uptake will be compiled under <strong>the</strong>leadership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> WHO.RECOMMENDATIONSZoonotic VL (<strong>the</strong> Mediterranean Basin, <strong>the</strong> Middle East, andBrazil)• A total liposomal amphotericin B dose <strong>of</strong> 20 mg/kg is adequateto treat immunocompetent children and adults in<strong>the</strong>se regions.• The exact dosing schedule can be flexible (divided into doses<strong>of</strong> 10 mg/kg on 2 consecutive days or in smaller divideddoses), but liposomal amphotericin B pharmacokineticssuggest that <strong>the</strong> initial dose will provide better tissue levelsif at least 5 mg/kg is given.• The schedule <strong>of</strong> 10 mg/kg/day on 2 consecutive days needsto be validated in adults with zoonotic VL.• Veterinary use <strong>of</strong> liposomal amphotericin B and o<strong>the</strong>r newantileishmanial drugs (e.g., miltefosine and paromomycin)should be avoided to prevent <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> resistance.Anthroponotic VL (South Asia and <strong>the</strong> Horn <strong>of</strong> Africa)• When unresponsiveness to antimonial drugs exceeds athreshold to be determined in each specific region, policymakers should strongly consider a shift to an alternativefirst-line regimen. An Indian expert committee has suggestedusing thresholds <strong>of</strong> 10%–20% unresponsiveness. Twopossible alternative regimens are an amphotericin B <strong>for</strong>mulation(<strong>for</strong> example, liposomal amphotericin B at a totaldose <strong>of</strong> 20 mg/kg) or a combination regimen that does notinclude Sb V .922 • CID 2006:43 (1 October) • REVIEWS OF ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS
• Use <strong>of</strong> combination antileishmanial drug regimens shouldbe promoted to prevent <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> resistance toexisting drugs. Well-conducted trials <strong>of</strong> specific combinationsare urgently needed. A regimen would be consideredeffective if it produces an initial parasitologic and clinicalcure in 95% <strong>of</strong> patients and a definitive cure at 6 monthsin 90% <strong>of</strong> patients.• With respect to liposomal amphotericin B, <strong>the</strong> followingcombinations should be tested: liposomal amphotericin Bplus miltefosine, liposomal amphotericin B plus paromomycin,and (in areas with !10% primary unresponsivenessto Sb V ) liposomal amphotericin B plus Sb V .• If Sb V or o<strong>the</strong>r mono<strong>the</strong>rapy is used <strong>for</strong> anthroponotic VL,it is imperative that <strong>the</strong> regimen fulfills WHO guidelines<strong>for</strong> adequacy (currently, 30 days <strong>of</strong> Sb V at 20 mg/kg/dayadministered once per day) and that all ef<strong>for</strong>ts are made toensure compliance with complete treatment courses.• To promote access <strong>for</strong> all patients, to ensure completeness<strong>of</strong> treatment, and to delay development <strong>of</strong> drug resistance,<strong>the</strong> public health community should work in concert withgovernments and drug companies to provide antileishmanialdrugs gratis or at <strong>the</strong> lowest possible price. To ensurequality <strong>of</strong> and access to care, patients with VL should preferablybe treated within or in close coordination with anappropriately structured and monitored public healthprogram.• The governments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> countries where VL endemicity ismajor should facilitate <strong>the</strong> clinical trials outlined above andaccelerate registration <strong>of</strong> liposomal amphotericin B ando<strong>the</strong>r antileishmanial drugs. Emphasis should be placed onareas where resistance is a problem or where HIV-Leishmaniacoinfection is a major issue.HIV-VL Coinfection• Access to HAART is high priority <strong>for</strong> HIV-VL–coinfectedpatients.• Multicenter trials <strong>of</strong> first-line treatment and secondary prophylaxis<strong>of</strong> VL in HIV-infected patients are needed, andliposomal amphotericin B regimens should be included in<strong>the</strong>se trials. Because <strong>of</strong> stark epidemiologic and clinical differences,results from trials in European settings should notbe extrapolated to apply to low-income countries, and viceversa.General• An alternative route <strong>of</strong> liposomal amphotericin B administrationthat is more easily employed in peripheral healthcare settings (intramuscular, subcutaneous, or intrarectal)would be extremely useful. Preclinical work to develop such<strong>for</strong>mulations is encouraged.• Research is needed to investigate <strong>the</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> liposomalamphotericin B in field settings where <strong>the</strong> cold chain maybe suboptimal, and to investigate it especially in extremeconditions (temperatures 145C).• The current price <strong>of</strong> liposomal amphotericin B is prohibitivelyhigh <strong>for</strong> VL treatment in resource-poor countries.There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> WHO and o<strong>the</strong>rs will work with its manufacturerto make it available at a preferential and moreaf<strong>for</strong>dable price <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sectors in India, Bangladesh,and Nepal and <strong>for</strong> programs that treat HIV-VL–coinfectedpatients in Brazil.AcknowledgmentsWe thank <strong>the</strong> Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome <strong>for</strong> kindly providing<strong>the</strong> meeting facilities.Financial support. The consultative meeting on which this article isbased was supported by Communicable Disease Control, Prevention andEradication, WHO (Geneva, Switzerland), and <strong>the</strong> Italian Cooperation.Potential conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest. J.A.-M. has served as consultant to, isa member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> speakers’ bureau <strong>of</strong>, and has received research grantsfrom manufacturers <strong>of</strong> liposomal amphotericin B (Gilead Sciences andFujisawa Healthcare [now Astella]). J.B. has served as a consultant to Gileadin relation to antiretroviral compounds. R.N.D. has received research fundingfrom <strong>the</strong> manufacturers <strong>of</strong> liposomal amphotericin B (Gilead Sciences)and has acted as a consultant <strong>for</strong> a nonpr<strong>of</strong>it company developing paromomycin(Institute <strong>of</strong> OneWorld Health). S.S. has received support <strong>for</strong>clinical trials and presentation <strong>of</strong> data at scientific meetings from <strong>the</strong> manufacturers<strong>of</strong> liposomal amphotericin B (Nextar Pharmaceuticals [now GileadSciences]). J.A. received institutional support <strong>for</strong> clinical trials from<strong>the</strong> manufacturers <strong>of</strong> amphotericin B lipid complex (PENSA, Grupo Esteve)and is a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientific board <strong>of</strong> Microbisome, a journal fundedby Vestar. All o<strong>the</strong>r authors: no conflicts.References1. World Health Organization. <strong>Leishmaniasis</strong> disease burden. Availableat: http://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/burden/en/. Accessed 27 April2005.2. Pearson RD, Jeronimo SMB, de Queiroz Sousa A. <strong>Leishmaniasis</strong>. In:Guerrant RL, Walker DH, Weller PF, eds. Tropical infectious diseases:principles, pathogens and practice. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone,1999:797–813.3. Bern C, Hightower AW, Chowdhury R, et al. Risk factors <strong>for</strong> kala-azarin Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11:655–62.4. Addy M, Nandy A. Ten years <strong>of</strong> kala-azar in west Bengal, part I: didpost-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis initiate <strong>the</strong> outbreak in 24-Parganas?Bull World Health Organ 1992; 70:341–6.5. Sundar S, More DK, Singh MK, et al. Failure <strong>of</strong> pentavalent antimonyin visceral leishmaniasis in India: report from <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Indianepidemic. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31:1104–7.6. Desjeux P. The increase in risk factors <strong>for</strong> leishmaniasis worldwide.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2001; 95:239–43.7. Bryceson A. A policy <strong>for</strong> leishmaniasis with respect to <strong>the</strong> preventionand control <strong>of</strong> drug resistance. Trop Med Int Health 2001; 6:928–34.8. Rijal S, Chappuis F, Singh R, et al. <strong>Treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> visceral leishmaniasisin south-eastern Nepal: decreasing efficacy <strong>of</strong> sodium stibogluconateand need <strong>for</strong> a policy to limit fur<strong>the</strong>r decline. Trans R Soc Trop MedHyg 2003; 97:350–4.9. Anoopa Sharma D, Bern C, Varghese B, et al. The economic impact<strong>of</strong> visceral leishmaniasis on households in Bangladesh. Trop Med IntHealth 2006; 11:757–64.10. National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme. Drug policy underkala-azar elimination programme as per recommendations <strong>of</strong> expertcommittee. 2000. Available at: http://www.namp.gov.in/kal8.html. Accessed28 June 2005.11. Seaman J, Boer C, Wilkinson R, et al. <strong>Liposomal</strong> amphotericin BREVIEWS OF ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS • CID 2006:43 (1 October) • 923