13.07.2015 Views

GONG Hα Instrument

GONG Hα Instrument

GONG Hα Instrument

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>GONG</strong> <strong>Hα</strong> <strong>Instrument</strong>J. Harvey & <strong>GONG</strong> Team


Outline• Overview• Optical design• <strong>Hα</strong> Filter• Camera• Mechanical• Remaining issuesSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 2


<strong>Instrument</strong> Design Goals• No significant impact on normal <strong>GONG</strong>data or operations.• Provide an <strong>Hα</strong> image 1 per min using full 7cm aperture of <strong>GONG</strong> instrument.• Match ISOON format.• Rapid transfer of image to AFWA via theInternet.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 3


Basic Plan• Extract <strong>Hα</strong> light with a beamsplitter.• Use a Fabry-Perot filter to isolate <strong>Hα</strong>.• Form image on 2048 x 2048 CCD camera.• Replace existing diffuser for better flat fieldcalibration.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 4


Prototype Optical DesignPBSFCCDL1L2L3L4PBS - polarizing beamsplitter, RMI customL1- plano convex lens, f=450 mm, OptoSigma 011-2358-A55L2- plano convex lens, f=800 mm, OptoSigma 011-2770-A55F- H-alpha filter, d=32 mm, Daystar Quantum PE 0.4AL3- positive achromat, f=300 mm, OptoSigma 026-1380L4- negative achromat, f=-100 mm, Edmund NT62-494Not shown: Fold mirror, Edmund K30-258Diffuser, Luminit L1P6MD-73 1°September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 5


Spot DiagramSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 6


Field Curvature & DistortionSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 8


1 Arcmin Grid Distortion x100September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 9


Optics Summary• Simple system meets needs.• Traded a 0.12Å radial variation of centralwavelength vs. radius to get best spatialuniformity.• All glass optics purchased and in house.• All lenses tested.• Prototype running at <strong>GONG</strong> test site.• Does not interfere with normal <strong>GONG</strong>operations. New diffuser works well.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 10


<strong>Hα</strong> Filter Requirements• Passband narrow enough to see flares,plages, filaments and prominences.• Affordable and readily available.• Robust for unattended field use.• Transmission suitable for short exposures.• Useable with existing optical system.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 11


<strong>Hα</strong> Filter Selection• Considered only Fabry-Perot filters.• Tested loaners from Coronado, Daystarand Solar Spectrum.• Lab tests and solar imaging tests.• Based on overall quality, selected DaystarQuantum PE 0.4 Å unit. (Plan B: SolarSpectrum).September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 12


Lab Tests of Filter• Set up an emission line source andcamera.• Collected images of filter in collimated lightat different temperature settings.• Produce images of wavelength ofpassband peak and HWHM.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 13


Filter Test SetupCMOScamera,lens andstoplens filter hydrogenemissionlamp,collimatorSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 14


Sample Filter Peak Variation•Fit Fabry-Perotfunction to eachpixel•Nominal zero6562.8 Å•Shows offset ofpeak wavelengthover range of -0.6to 0.2 Å•Histogram ~flatfrom -0.4 to 0.1 ÅSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 15


Sample Filter HWHM•Fit Fabry-Perotfunction to eachpixel•Daystar HWHM isspec’d 0.20 Å•Shows HWHMover range of 0.15to 0.35 Å•Histogram peakedat ~0.23 ÅSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 16


Lab Test Results• DayStar optics of good quality.• Peak wavelength variation out of spec.• HWHM acceptable.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 17


Solar Test Setup• Rooftop light feed into basement lab.• <strong>GONG</strong> entrance window and objective.• Breadboard optical system and loanercamera.• Crude guider.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 18


March 3, 2009 SampleSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 19


Filter Status• 10 filters on order. Due Oct. 15.• Prototype uses a borrowed unit with old,inferior filter optics in a modern package.• Extensive NSO qualification testingprogram planned (wavefront, HWHM,transmission, etc.)September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 20


Filter Issue• Vendor has screened 1/5 of micainventory and found enough for our job.• But, vendor discovered a persistent indexgradient that shifts center wavelength.• Countering this by using a temperaturegradient in their oven (two heaters).• Vendor holds to on-time delivery but Iexpect this will add ~3 weeks.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 21


Filter StatusC:\Documents andSettings\jharvey\LocalSettings\TempSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 22


Center Wavelength VariationCompensationbaselinewith gradient heatingSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 23


September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 24


Filter Problem Mitigation• Reduce area of filter used by our system– Try 90% of clear aperture, do ray tracing.– No change in image quality.– Center to limb wavelength shift now 0.17Å.– Requires one lens change ($28 ea).– No mechanical problems, only small changes.• Backup vendor (serious concerns)September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 25


Filter Concerns• Delivery.• Wavefront quality. Loaner was fine but ourold unit is poor. Contingency plan tocorrect low-order aberrations if necessary.• Temperature gradient strategy success.• Uniformity among 10 units.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 26


CCD Camera Requirements 1• Match Nyquist frequency to MTF cutoff– 2048 x 2048 pixels to capture full disk• Fast readout, short exposure– Produce image in under 1 s (control blur)• Large dynamic range– Low dark noise (for disk and prominences)– Large full well (for flares)September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 27


CCD Camera Requirements 2• Robust for unattended field use.• Affordable and readily available.• Camera makes good use of CCD.• Programmable exposure time.• Industry standard interface.• Available software and support.• Good performance at high speed.• No interference fringing.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 28


CCD and Camera Selection• Kodak KAI-4022 interline transfer CCD– 2048 x 2048 7.4μ pixels– 38000 e- FW– Microlenses• DVC(Digital Video Camera Co)-4000AM camera, uncooled– 4.35 fps @ 20 MHz (low noise mode)– 12 bit A/D, 1 ADU = 9 e-– 10 e- RMS camera readout noise– dark clamped for good dark stability– Add 4 exposures to improve dynamic rangeSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 29


Camera Tests• Tested cooled and uncooled CCD units.• Dark stability.• Dark vs. exposure time.• Response to light.• Noise vs. light input.• Imaging with breadboard optical setup.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 30


Camera Dark Noise Stability12 hour dark mean11.4411.43mean dark11.4211.4111.411.3911.380 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000secondsSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 31


Camera Dark Noise vs Exposuredark noise vs expRMS noise (ADU)141210864200 1000 2000 3000uncooledcooled #2•Cooling reducesdark current bylarge factor•Not a significantfactor at ourexposure timesof ~40 msec•May need tofilter some hotpixelsExp time (msec)September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 32


Camera Light Responselo g sig maphoton transfer1.61.41.210.80.60.40.200 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4log meanmean signallinearity4500400035003000250020001500100050000 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180exp time (msec)•Textbook response•Confirms FW & gain•Highly linear responseSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 33


Camera Noise vs LightNoise vs Signal @ 40 ms3025•4 frame averagesSigma (ADU)2015105uncooledcooled #2•No differencebetween cooledand uncooled•Noise is asexpected fromphoton shot noisestatistics00 1000 2000 3000 4000Signal (ADU)September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 34


Camera Smear•Caused by lightleaking into coveredchannels and readoutbiasing•Amplitude ~ 0.3 %(range here 0 – 30ADU)•Only significant forprominence studies•Easily corrected bysubtraction of columnmeansSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 35


Camera Results• Cameras show expected performancefrom Kodak CCD.• Dark signals well behaved (some very lowlevel hum).• Light signal very linear, follows expectednoise behavior.• Well built.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 36


Camera Status• 10 cameras ordered and delivered.• All cameras passed lab tests.• One installed at prototype and one inbreadboard.• Should start a burn-in test to catch anyearly failures.• Custom software under development.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 37


Mechanical Requirements• Simple interface to existing system.• Provide mountings for optics.• Focus and image size adjustments.• Minimize changes and construction costs.• Easy to install and align.September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 38


Mechanical OverviewSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 39


Sled DetailSeptember 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 40


Mechanical Status/Issues• Installation space checked at all sites.• Prototype built and installed.• Simplified beamsplitter mount designed.• Waiting for production go/no-go decision.• New, shortened version (filter problem)• Dust shield design TBD (not critical).September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 41


Remaining Issues• Optics– Quality of filters.– Replacement of turret entrance windows?• Mechanical– New shorter version– Procedure for field installation and adjustment• Longevity of filters and cameras?• Schedule threats?September 22, 2009 <strong>GONG</strong> H-alpha Review 42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!