13.07.2015 Views

Is love for green in our genes? - Agnes van den Berg

Is love for green in our genes? - Agnes van den Berg

Is love for green in our genes? - Agnes van den Berg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARTICLE IN PRESS8 Y. Joye, A. <strong>van</strong> <strong>den</strong> <strong>Berg</strong> / Urban Forestry & Urban Green<strong>in</strong>g xxx (2011) xxx–xxxGr<strong>in</strong>de, B., Patil, G.G., 2009. Biophilia: does visual contact with nature impacton health and well-be<strong>in</strong>g? International J<strong>our</strong>nal of Environmental Researchand Public Health 6, 2332–2343.Hagerhall, C.M., Purcell, T., Taylor, R., 2004. Fractal dimension of landscape silhouetteoutl<strong>in</strong>es as a predictor of landscape preference. J<strong>our</strong>nal of EnvironmentalPsychology 24, 247–255.Han, K.-T., 2007. Responses to six major terrestrial biomes <strong>in</strong> terms of scenic beauty,preference, and restorativeness. Environment and Behavior 39, 529–556.Hartig, T., E<strong>van</strong>s, G.W., 1993. Psychological foundations of nature experience.In: Gärl<strong>in</strong>g, T., Golledge, R.G. (Eds.), Behavior and Environment: Psychologicaland Geographical Approaches. , Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 427–457.Hartig, T., Staats, H., 2005. L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g preference <strong>for</strong> environments with their restorativequality. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., Fry, G., Opdam, P. (Eds.), FromLandscape Research to Landscape Plann<strong>in</strong>g: Aspects of Integration, Educationand Applica- tion. Spr<strong>in</strong>ger, Dordrecht, pp. 279–292.Hartig, T., Van <strong>den</strong> <strong>Berg</strong>, A.E., Hagerhall, C.M., Tomalak, M., Bauer, N.,Hansmann, R., Ojala, A., Syngollitou, E., Carrus, G., Van Herzele, A., Bell, S.,Podesta, M.T.C., Waaseth, G., 2010. Health benefits of nature experience:psychological, social and cultural processes. In: Nilsson, K., Sangster, M., Gallis,C., et, al. (Eds.), Forests, Trees and Human Health. Spr<strong>in</strong>ger Science Bus<strong>in</strong>ess andMedia, Dordrecht, pp.127–168.Hartmann, P., Apaolaza-Ibáñ ez, V., 2009. Beyond Sa<strong>van</strong>na: An evolutionary an<strong>den</strong>vi- ronmental psychology approach to behavioral effects of nature scenery <strong>in</strong><strong>green</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g. J<strong>our</strong>nal of Environmental Psychology 30, 119–128.Haviland-Jones, J., Rosario, H.H., Wilson, P., McGuire, T.R., 2005. Anenviron- mental approach to positive emotion: flowers. EvolutionaryPsychology 3,104–132.Heerwagen, J.H., Orians, G.H., 1993. Humans, habitats, and aesthetics. In:Kellert, S.R., Wilson, E.O. (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis. <strong>Is</strong>land Press,Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, pp.138–172.Herzog, T.R., Rector, A.E., 2009. Perceived danger and judged likelihood of restoration.Environment and Behavior 41, 387–401.Jaffe, E., 2010. This side of paradise. Why the human m<strong>in</strong>d needs nature. APS Observer23, 10–15.Joye, Y., 2007. Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: the caseof biophilic architecture. Review of General Psychology 11, 305–328.Joye, Y., De Block, A., 2011. ‘Nature and I are two’. A critical analysis of the biophiliahypothesis. Environmental Values 20, 189–215.Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Kaplan, S., 1992. Environmental preference <strong>in</strong> knowledge-seek<strong>in</strong>g, knowledge-us<strong>in</strong>gorganism. In: Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J. (Eds.), The Adapted M<strong>in</strong>d. Ox<strong>for</strong>dUniversity Press, Ox<strong>for</strong>d, pp. 581–598.Korpela, K.M., Klemettilä, T., Hietanen, J.K., 2002. Evi<strong>den</strong>ce <strong>for</strong> rapid affective evaluationof environmental scenes. Environment & Behavior 34, 634–650.Kuo, F.E., 2001. Cop<strong>in</strong>g with poverty: impacts of environment and attention <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>ner city. Environment & Behavior 33, 5–34.Laland, K.N., Brown, G.R., 2006. Niche construction, human behavi<strong>our</strong> and the adaptivelag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology 15, 95–104.Lewis, J., 2005. Challenges of <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>arity <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>est management andland- scape perception research. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., Fry, G., et, al.(Eds.), From Landscape Research to Landscape Plann<strong>in</strong>g: Aspects of Integration,Education, and Application. Spr<strong>in</strong>ger, Dordrecht, pp. 83–94.Lohr, V.I., 2007. Benefits of nature: what we are learn<strong>in</strong>g about why people respondto nature. J<strong>our</strong>nal of Physiological Anthropology 26, 83–85.Lohr, V.I., Pearson-Mims, C.H., 2006. Responses to scenes with spread<strong>in</strong>g, roundedand conical tree <strong>for</strong>ms. Environment & Behavior 38, 667–688.Lyons, E., 1983. Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environment andBehavior 15, 487–511.Martens, D., Gutscher, H., Bauer, N., 2010. Walk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> “wild” and “tended”urban <strong>for</strong>ests: the impact on psychological well-be<strong>in</strong>g. J<strong>our</strong>nal ofEnvironmental Psy- chology 31, 36–44.M<strong>in</strong>eka, S., Öhman, A., 2002. Phobias and preparedness: the selective,automatic, and encapsulated nature of fear. Biological Psychiatry 52, 927–937.Ode, Å., Fry, G., Tveit, M.S., Messager, P., Miller, D., 2009. Indicators ofperceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. J<strong>our</strong>nal ofEnvironmental Man- agement 90, 375–383.Parsons, R., Tass<strong>in</strong>ary, L.G., Ulrich, R.S., Hebl, M.R., Grossman-Alexander, M., 1998.The view from the road: implications <strong>for</strong> stress recovery andimmunization. J<strong>our</strong>nal of Environmental Psychology 18, 113–140.Purcell, T., Peron, E., Berto, R., 2001. Why do preferences differ between scene types?Environment and Behavior 33, 93–106.Reber, R., Schwarz, N., W<strong>in</strong>kielman, P., 2004. Process<strong>in</strong>g fluency and aesthetic pleasure:is beauty <strong>in</strong> the perceiver’s process<strong>in</strong>g experience? Personality and SocialPsychology Review 8, 364–382.Redies, C., 2007. A universal model of esthetic perception based on thesensory cod<strong>in</strong>g of natural stimuli. Spatial Vision 21, 97–117.Selye, H., 1956. The Stress of Life. McGraw Hill, New York.Sulli<strong>van</strong>, W.C., 2003. The sa<strong>van</strong>na and the city: nature at home. In: Barlett,P. (Ed.), Urban Place: Reconnections with the Natural World. AcademicExchange, Atlanta, pp. 55–63.T<strong>in</strong>io, P., 2010. Visual Features, Aesthetic Judgments, and Modulat<strong>in</strong>gFac- tors. Vienna. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Retrieved on 06.10.10from http://othes.univie.ac.at/9137/1/2010-01-28 0605023.pdf.Todorova, A., Asakawa, S., Aikoh, T., 2004. Preferences <strong>for</strong> and attitudestowards street flowers and trees <strong>in</strong> Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and UrbanPlann<strong>in</strong>g 69,403–416.Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., 1992. The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow,J.H., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J. (Eds.), The Adapted M<strong>in</strong>d. Evolutionary Psychologyand the Generation of Culture. Ox<strong>for</strong>d University Press, New York, pp. 19–136.Tveit, M., Ode, Å., Fry, G., 2006. Key concepts <strong>in</strong> a framework <strong>for</strong> analyz<strong>in</strong>g visuallandscape character. Landscape Research 31, 229–255.Ulrich, R.S., 1991. Natural versus urban scenes—some psychophysiological effects.Environment and Behavior 13, 523–556.Ulrich, R.S., 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman,I., Wohlwill, J.F. (Eds.), Human Behavior and Environment, vol. 6. PlenumPress, New York, pp. 85–125.Ulrich, R.S., 1986. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape andUrban Plann<strong>in</strong>g 13, 29–44.Ulrich, R.S., 1993. Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In: Kellert, S.R., Wilson,E.O. (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis. <strong>Is</strong>land Press, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, pp. 73–137.Ulrich, R.S., 1999. Effects of gar<strong>den</strong>s on health outcomes: theory and research. In:Cooper-Marcus, C., Barnes, M. (Eds.), Heal<strong>in</strong>g Gar<strong>den</strong>s: Therapeutic Benefits andDesign Recommendations. John Wiley, New York, pp. 27–86.Ulrich, R.S., 2008. Biophilic theory and research <strong>for</strong> healthcare design. In:Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J.H., Mador, M.L. (Eds.), Biophilic Design: The Theory,Science, and Practice of Br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g Build<strong>in</strong>gs to Life. John Wiley, Hoboken, pp. 87–106.Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A., Zelson, M., 1991. Stressrecovery dur<strong>in</strong>g exposure to natural and urban environments. J<strong>our</strong>nal of EnvironmentalPsychology 11, 201–230.Van <strong>den</strong> <strong>Berg</strong>, A.E., 2009. Restorative effects of nature: towards a neurobiologicalapproach. In: Louts, T., Reitenbach, M., Molenbroek, J. (Eds.), Human Diversity,Design <strong>for</strong> Life. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 9th International Congress of PhysiologicalAnthropology, 22–26 August, Delft, The Netherlands. Faculty of Industrial DesignEng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Delft University of Technology, Delft, pp. 132–138.Van <strong>den</strong> <strong>Berg</strong>, A.E., Hartig, T., Staats, H., 2007. Preference <strong>for</strong> nature <strong>in</strong>urbanized societies: stress, restoration, and the pursuit of susta<strong>in</strong>ability.J<strong>our</strong>nal of Social <strong>Is</strong>sues 63, 79–96.Van <strong>den</strong> <strong>Berg</strong>, A.E., Koole, S.L., Van der Wulp, N.Y., 2003. Environmentalpreference and restoration: (How) are they related? J<strong>our</strong>nal of EnvironmentalPsychology23, 135–146.Velarde, M.D., Fry, G., Tveit, M., 2007. Health effects ofview<strong>in</strong>g landscapes—landscape types <strong>in</strong> environmental psychology. UrbanForestry & Urban Green<strong>in</strong>g 6, 199–212.Wilson, E.O., 1984. Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species. Harvard UniversityPress, Cambridge.Zajonc, R., 1980. Feel<strong>in</strong>g and th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g: preferences need no <strong>in</strong>ferences.AmericanPsychologist 35, 151–175.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!