- Page 5:
Chapter 2:Access to Rights:Identifi
- Page 8 and 9:
Chapter 6:Recommendations6.1 Introd
- Page 10 and 11:
AcronymsANICASTICACABCAJCEHRCGBCIBC
- Page 12 and 13:
SOLIDTRACETUCTUIUDAUSIStrategies on
- Page 14 and 15:
3. Staff of equality bodies, advice
- Page 16 and 17:
In exploring the difficulties assoc
- Page 18 and 19:
esolution processes (Chapter 3). Du
- Page 20 and 21:
Participants at a recent UK confere
- Page 22 and 23:
the performance of public functions
- Page 24 and 25:
esearch has included work on LGB ac
- Page 26 and 27:
powers that entail litigation. Unli
- Page 28 and 29:
most cases, require a complainant t
- Page 30 and 31:
educating potential applicants and
- Page 32 and 33:
an amount of evidence to the effect
- Page 34 and 35:
people are cautious about disclosin
- Page 36 and 37:
either jurisdiction, yet social cla
- Page 38 and 39:
Social Effects of Discrimination, d
- Page 40 and 41:
Moreover, the social inequalities t
- Page 42 and 43:
oppression lesbian women were more
- Page 44 and 45:
only 27.6% felt that they understoo
- Page 46 and 47:
Such applications arise only in a m
- Page 48 and 49:
Centres or make contact by phone or
- Page 50 and 51:
The LAB representative pointed out
- Page 52 and 53:
eports that take-up of the service
- Page 54 and 55:
epresentation. UNISON has been invo
- Page 56 and 57:
One NGO that has already been invol
- Page 58:
According to the research participa
- Page 61 and 62:
If the EA or the ECNI assists an in
- Page 63 and 64:
This outcome reflects a wider reali
- Page 65 and 66:
divergence were not unpacked some i
- Page 67 and 68:
and Citizens Advice Bureaux was ide
- Page 69 and 70:
It is very difficult to take a case
- Page 71 and 72:
This exception is therefore unlikel
- Page 73 and 74:
statutory authority defence. It is
- Page 75 and 76:
activities or of the context in whi
- Page 77 and 78:
that the definition of a “service
- Page 79 and 80:
unwelcome and insulting comments ma
- Page 81 and 82:
incident or most recent occurrence
- Page 83 and 84:
A strong preference emerged from LG
- Page 85 and 86:
Ireland Court of Appeal may however
- Page 87 and 88:
hearing or meeting. It can also hav
- Page 89 and 90:
a claim and updated regularly follo
- Page 91 and 92:
from 2000-2005 and this “has put
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 1: Individual Claimants: Emer
- Page 95 and 96:
a parallel manner the EA hosts a fo
- Page 97 and 98: The EA has undertaken further joint
- Page 99 and 100: duties. This conference was widely
- Page 101 and 102: 4.2.2 Individual and Group Justice
- Page 103 and 104: considerable stakeholder approval f
- Page 105 and 106: LGB individuals and NGOs consistent
- Page 107 and 108: 4.4.1 Advocacy - The Equality Bodie
- Page 109 and 110: premises under the Intoxicating Liq
- Page 111 and 112: epresentation in discrimination cas
- Page 113 and 114: Equality Officers enjoy significant
- Page 115 and 116: (1) If the Commission receives a co
- Page 117 and 118: eview thereby getting around the co
- Page 119 and 120: voluntary equality reviews and equa
- Page 121 and 122: involved collaboration between empl
- Page 123 and 124: powers extended to the field of emp
- Page 125 and 126: uling on enforcement of Section 75
- Page 127 and 128: Associated legislationCivil partner
- Page 129 and 130: grounds to include, amongst others,
- Page 131 and 132: Justice project that is discussed b
- Page 133 and 134: RFSL and HomO have been involved in
- Page 135 and 136: informed in relation to development
- Page 137 and 138: on GFS and 14 other. The Dutch CGB
- Page 139 and 140: There are numerous examples, in the
- Page 141 and 142: Rights Center et al 2004; Rorive 20
- Page 143 and 144: 5.4.3 LitigationHomO can bring a ca
- Page 145 and 146: people but the focus is more on the
- Page 147: 6.2.1 Homophobia and HeterosexismEq
- Page 151 and 152: The inclusion of SO as a ground in
- Page 153 and 154: 6.2.3 Mechanisms of AccessEquality
- Page 155 and 156: Dialogue with CABx and CICsA legal
- Page 157 and 158: All of the constituencies involved
- Page 159 and 160: substantial experience in represent
- Page 161 and 162: In terms of legal representation at
- Page 163 and 164: Table 3: RecommendationsUnderlying
- Page 165 and 166: Inadequate redressComplex andopaque
- Page 167 and 168: Winter 2005 (Dublin: Equality Autho
- Page 169 and 170: Authority) 13-15, 22, 54, 71, 106-1
- Page 171 and 172: (Luxembourg: Office for Official Pu
- Page 173 and 174: Kelly, J.M. (with G. Hogan, and G.
- Page 175 and 176: O’Carroll, Íde, and Laura Szalac
- Page 177 and 178: and Elspeth Morris (2003) Snakes an
- Page 179 and 180: Queerspace 211 Gay and Lesbian Yout
- Page 181 and 182: Interviews with Individuals in Nort
- Page 183 and 184: Labour Relations Agency Northern Ir
- Page 185 and 186: individuals or promoting the rights
- Page 187 and 188: Percentage 1.6% 3.9% 6.7% 1.8% 0%Re
- Page 189 and 190: Sexual Orientation Ground in Case F
- Page 191 and 192: alleged that he was also humiliated
- Page 193: Contacting the Equality AuthorityTh