13.07.2015 Views

Comment letter on acquisition of interest (PDF 60 KB) - KPMG

Comment letter on acquisition of interest (PDF 60 KB) - KPMG

Comment letter on acquisition of interest (PDF 60 KB) - KPMG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

€<strong>KPMG</strong> IFRG Limited Tel +44 (0)20 7694 85898 Salisbury Square mark.vaessen@kpmg.co.ukL<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong> EC4Y 8BBUnited KingdomMr Hans HoogervorstInternati<strong>on</strong>al Accounting Standards Board1 st Floor30 Cann<strong>on</strong> StreetL<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong>EC4M 6XHOur refC<strong>on</strong>tactJS/IASB-EDMark Vaessen17 April 2013Dear Mr Hoogervorst<str<strong>on</strong>g>Comment</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>letter</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> ED/2012/7 Acquisiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an Interest in a Joint Operati<strong>on</strong>We appreciate the opportunity to comment <strong>on</strong> ED/2012/7 Acquisiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an Interest in a JointOperati<strong>on</strong> – Proposed amendment to IFRS 11. We have c<strong>on</strong>sulted with, and this <str<strong>on</strong>g>letter</str<strong>on</strong>g>represents the views <strong>of</strong>, the <strong>KPMG</strong> network.We support the proposed amendment. The Appendix to this <str<strong>on</strong>g>letter</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tains our resp<strong>on</strong>ses to thespecific questi<strong>on</strong>s raised in the ED, including some drafting suggesti<strong>on</strong>s.Please c<strong>on</strong>tact Mark Vaessen or Julie Santoro at +44 (0)20 7694 8871 if you wish to discuss any<strong>of</strong> the issues raised in this <str<strong>on</strong>g>letter</str<strong>on</strong>g>.Yours sincerely<strong>KPMG</strong> IFRG Limited<strong>KPMG</strong> IFRG Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, is a member <strong>of</strong><strong>KPMG</strong> Internati<strong>on</strong>al Cooperative, a Swiss entity.Registered in England No 5253019Registered <strong>of</strong>fice: 8 Salisbury Square, L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong>, EC4Y 8BB


ABCD<strong>KPMG</strong> IFRG Limited<str<strong>on</strong>g>Comment</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>letter</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> ED/2012/7 Acquisiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an Interest in a Joint Operati<strong>on</strong>17 April 2013AppendixQuesti<strong>on</strong> 1 – Relevant principlesDo you agree with the proposed amendment? Why or why not? If not, what alternative do youpropose?We agree with the proposed amendment.We believe that it is appropriate to apply the acquisiti<strong>on</strong> accounting methodology to theacquisiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an <strong>interest</strong> that gives an entity joint c<strong>on</strong>trol. This approach is substantially alignedwith that applied to the acquisiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an <strong>interest</strong> in an associate or joint venture as prescribed byIAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures.For clarity, we believe that the drafting <strong>of</strong> B33A should refer to applying “IFRS 3 and relatedIFRSs dealing with business combinati<strong>on</strong>s accounting” and not “the relevant principles <strong>on</strong>business combinati<strong>on</strong>s accounting in IFRS 3 and other IFRSs”. This is because IFRS 3 includesexcepti<strong>on</strong>s to the measurement and recogniti<strong>on</strong> principles that should also be applied when anentity acquires an <strong>interest</strong> in a joint operati<strong>on</strong>.For the avoidance <strong>of</strong> doubt, we also recommend making it clear that the requirements <strong>of</strong> IFRS 3for a business combinati<strong>on</strong> achieved in stages would apply when an entity acquires a jointc<strong>on</strong>trolling <strong>interest</strong> in a joint operati<strong>on</strong> in which it held an <strong>interest</strong> immediately before theacquisiti<strong>on</strong> date. For example, an investor holds a 10 percent <strong>interest</strong> in a joint operati<strong>on</strong> – i.e.the investor is not <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the joint c<strong>on</strong>trollers; it subsequently acquires a further 40 percent<strong>interest</strong> to obtain joint c<strong>on</strong>trol. A new part (e) could be added to B33A as follows:e) remeasuring any previously held <strong>interest</strong> in the joint operati<strong>on</strong>’s assets and liabilities at theiracquisiti<strong>on</strong>-date fair value and recognising the resulting gain or loss, if any, in pr<strong>of</strong>it or loss.Questi<strong>on</strong> 2 – ScopeDo you agree with the proposed amendment? Why or why not? If not, what alternative do youpropose?We agree with the proposed amendment.In the spirit <strong>of</strong> a limited scope amendment, we agree that the amendment should not apply whenno existing business is c<strong>on</strong>tributed to the joint operati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> formati<strong>on</strong>. However, for clarity, werecommend that the final sentence <strong>of</strong> BC10 be added to B33B, which would read as follows(shown in black-line compared to the proposals).Paragraphs 21A and B33A apply to the acquisiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an <strong>interest</strong> in a joint operati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> itsformati<strong>on</strong>, except when there is no existing business, i.e. when no existing business isc<strong>on</strong>tributed to the joint operati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> its formati<strong>on</strong>.JS/IASB-ED 2


ABCD<strong>KPMG</strong> IFRG Limited<str<strong>on</strong>g>Comment</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>letter</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> ED/2012/7 Acquisiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an Interest in a Joint Operati<strong>on</strong>17 April 2013Questi<strong>on</strong> 3 – Transiti<strong>on</strong> requirementDo you agree with the proposed transiti<strong>on</strong> requirement? Why or why not? If not, whatalternative do you propose?We agree with the proposed transiti<strong>on</strong> requirement.JS/IASB-ED 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!