South Carolina Public Library Economic Impact Study - Illinois

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Morris, A., et. al. (2001b). Value of book borrowing from public libraries: userperceptions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 33(4), 191-198.Morris, A., et. al. (2002). Economic value of public libraries in the UK. Libri 52(2), 78-87.New York. State Library. “New York Libraries: How they Stack Up.”http://www.nysl.nysed.gov/libdev/stackup.htm (2004).OCLC, Inc. Libraries: how they stack up. Dublin, OH: OCLC, Inc. Available:http://www5.oclc.org/downloads/community/librariesstackup.pdfSumsion, J., et. al. (2002). The economic value of book borrowing from public libraries:An optimisation model. Journal of Documentation 58(6), 662-682.University of South Carolina. Moore School of Business. Division of Research. TheEconomic Impact of the Cultural Industry on the State of South Carolina. (2002).Prepared for the SC Arts Commission. Columbia, SC: The Commission. Available:http://research.moore.sc.edu/research/studies/CulturalInd/cult2002.pdfUsherwood, B. (2002). Accounting for outcomes: demonstrating the impact of publiclibraries. Australian Public Libraries and Information Services 15(1), 5-13.Vaughan, L.Q. (1997). The impact of the public library on business success: an analysisbased on medium-sized businesses in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Information andLibrary Science 22(2), 17-29.South Carolina Public Library Economic Impact Study 63
The Economic Impact of Public Librarieson South CarolinaAcknowledgementsA study prepared by:The School of Library and Information ScienceUniversity of South CarolinaDaniel D. Barron, DirectorRobert V. Williams, ProfessorStephen Bajjaly, Assoc. ProfessorJennifer Arns, Asst. ProfessorSteven Wilson, Research AssistantUniversity of South CarolinaCollege of Mass Communications and Information StudiesSchool of Library and Information ScienceJanuary, 2005
Page 1 and 2:
South Carolina Public Library Econo
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsExecutive Summary
Page 5 and 6:
o Helped to obtain a new job: 11% s
Page 7 and 8:
Background and Rationale for the St
Page 9 and 10:
Surveys of users and non-users of p
Page 11 and 12:
economy.” The brochure may be fou
Page 14 and 15: o 12% said it had contributed to th
Page 16 and 17: Summary of Findings from the Analys
Page 18 and 19: For questions 5, 6, 7, & 8 please s
Page 20 and 21: • Contributed to your Home School
Page 22 and 23: 7. What type of reference materials
Page 24 and 25: A.3: Responses from the Personal In
Page 26 and 27: 10. What dollar value would you ass
Page 28 and 29: 5. If you answered "Yes" to the pre
Page 30 and 31: • All libraries provide essential
Page 32 and 33: am out and about learning more. We
Page 34 and 35: CHARLESTON• Ability to find a wid
Page 36 and 37: charge). I have been able to make s
Page 38 and 39: • I have been able to update my r
Page 40 and 41: EDGEFIELD• My family uses "DISCUS
Page 42 and 43: I feel more confident that I am mak
Page 44 and 45: purchase are appropriate for my stu
Page 46 and 47: • The ability to obtain informati
Page 48 and 49: personal and professional growth an
Page 50 and 51: • The library (along with my pare
Page 52 and 53: time activities that additional pro
Page 54 and 55: CHARLESTON• I am a homeschool par
Page 56 and 57: LEXINGTON• Homeschool resources T
Page 58 and 59: Appendix B: Detailed Findings from
Page 60 and 61: subscriptions held results in: (sum
Page 62 and 63: Part II: Indirect Economic Impacts
Page 66 and 67: Research Team and AcknowledgementsD
Page 68 and 69: The Economic Impact of Public Libra
Page 70 and 71: o Helped to obtain a new job: 11% s
Page 72: School of Library & Information Sci
show all

South Carolina Public Library Economic Impact Study - Illinois

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?