13.07.2015 Views

TEENAGE SEX: What Should Schools Teach Children? Published ...

TEENAGE SEX: What Should Schools Teach Children? Published ...

TEENAGE SEX: What Should Schools Teach Children? Published ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Teach</strong>ers rarely discuss sex itself, let alone how to have a satisfying sex life. They don'tpromote the idea that sexual rights are human rights, and never support the right of youngpeople under the age of consent to make their own choice about when they are ready for sex.Education about emotions and relationships is almost entirely absent.Homosexuality and bisexuality are likewise often neglected - leaving many lesbian, gay andbisexual pupils feeling isolated and confused, and without of any specific advice on HIVprevention for same-sex relations. Sexual prejudice, and the teasing and bullying of pupilswho don't conform to gender stereotypes, passes unchallenged in many schools.Given the widespread concern about sexual abuse, it is particularly disturbing that mostyoung people never get taught sexual assertiveness and how to deal with unwelcome sexualattentionThese failings point to the need for a radical overhaul of sex education to help resolve themany sexual and emotional problems experienced by young people - problems that oftencontinue into adulthood, causing lifelong personal distress. This essay argues that schoolsshould affirm the value and pleasure of human sexuality, empowering pupils with theknowledge, skills and confidence to make responsible choices that enable them to enjoy ahappy, healthy sex life.Mutual Respect, Consent and Fulfilment<strong>Schools</strong> cannot be moral-free zones where anything goes. There has to be some kind ofmoral framework for sex education, otherwise teachers would end up sanctioning all kinds ofdangerous, destructive behaviour: coercive and unsafe sex, domineering and violentrelationships. A moral framework is not, however, the same as a moralistic one. Both impartethical values but they differ in one very significant respect: a moralistic framework excludes,whereas a truly moral one is inclusive of different people with diverse backgrounds andlifestyles.Until very recent times, all sex education was overwhelmingly biased towards promotingheterosexuality, marriage, parenthood and traditional family life. Anything outside thisexclusive framework was either ignored or condemned. Knowledge of the full range ofconsensual sex and love was systematically suppressed. Young people who did not abide bythe prevailing sexual orthodoxy - such as gays and bisexuals - were marginalized and oftenended up feeling inadequate, guilty, rejected and self-loathing.This old-style monocultural sex moralism is now totally out of sync with our modernmulticultural society where there is a great diversity of cultures and communities, lifestylesand love-lives.Acknowledging these social changes is, however, no reason to lapse into anarchic moral

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!