Reaffirming the Environment-Development Nexus of UNCED 1992
Reaffirming the Environment-Development Nexus of UNCED 1992
Reaffirming the Environment-Development Nexus of UNCED 1992
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ch a p t e r Th r e eINTEGRATION OF DEVELOPMENTCONCERNS IN GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTISSUES: BACKGROUND<strong>UNCED</strong> was originally an initiative <strong>of</strong> governments and environmentNGOs in some Nor<strong>the</strong>rn countries, which had become increasinglyanxious about <strong>the</strong> deteriorating state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment worldwide.They decided that it would be timely to hold a world conferenceon <strong>the</strong> environment to mark <strong>the</strong> twentieth year after <strong>the</strong> Stockholm<strong>Environment</strong> Conference <strong>of</strong> 1972, which had led to <strong>the</strong> establishment<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United Nations <strong>Environment</strong> Programme.When <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> an environment conference was introduced in <strong>the</strong>United Nations, many developing countries were concerned that thisinitiative could lead to <strong>the</strong> highlighting <strong>of</strong> environment issues thatwould place new obligations and disciplines on <strong>the</strong>ir ability to enjoyeconomic growth and development. Some developing countriesfeared that <strong>the</strong> environment could be used as ano<strong>the</strong>r instrumentto keep <strong>the</strong> South at low levels <strong>of</strong> development, whilst Nor<strong>the</strong>rncountries that possessed more environmentally friendly technologycould continue to grow and enjoy high consumption levels.They thus insisted that whilst environment problems could bebrought up as an issue <strong>of</strong> global priority, <strong>the</strong>se should be discussedsimultaneously with a range <strong>of</strong> “development issues”, since <strong>the</strong>rewas also a crisis <strong>of</strong> development side by side with <strong>the</strong> crisis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>environment. Moreover, so <strong>the</strong> argument went, <strong>the</strong> developingcountries would not be able to adequately tackle environment13