2010 Pre-K-Grade 12 Gifted Programming Standards ... - NAGC

____________________________________________________________________Res : N-8/162 F-6, Rajendra Vihar ,Newada, Sunderpur,Varanasi-221005,UP,IndiaR: 0542-2316859T : 0542-2368558,23072220542-6701673F: 0542-2369425, 2368174M : 08004928263E: registrar@bhu.ac.inProf. G.S.YadavREGISTRARW : www.bhu.ac.in______________________________________________________________________________________Part I: General Terms1. GOALS OF THIS EXPRESSION OF INTEREST(EOI)2. EOI ISSUING AUTHORITY3. EOI PROCESSING FEES4. VENUE & DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALSPart II : Scope of Work1. BACKGROUND2. SCOPE OF WORKPart III: Bidding Terms and Pre-Qualification Criteria1. CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS EOI IS ISSUED2. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF TERMS3. EVALUATION OF PRE QUALIFICATION PROPOSAL4. PRE QUALIFICATION CRITERIA5. PRE QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENT PROPOSAL1. FORM 1 : COVERING LETTER2. GENERAL DETAILS OF THE ORGANIZATION3. FINANCIAL DETAIL OF THE ORGANIZATIONPart IV: Annexure response formats4

Kaplan, S. N. (2005). Layering differentiated curricula for the gifted and talented. In F. Karnes & S. Bean(Eds.). Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2 nd ed., pp. 107-136). Waco, TX: PrufrockPress.Karnes, F., & Bean, S. (Eds.). (2005) Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2 nd ed.). Waco, TX:Prufrock Press.Kerr, B., & Sodano, S. (2003). Career assessment with intellectually gifted students. Journal of CareerAssessment, 11, 168-186.Kirschenbaum, R. J. (1998). Dynamic assessment and its use with underserved gifted and talentedpopulations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 140-147.Kitano, M. K., & Espinosa, R. (1995). Language diversity and giftedness: Working with gifted Englishlanguage learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 234-254.Kitano, M. K., Montgomery, D., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen, S. (2008). Using the national giftededucation standards for PreK-12 professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Kitano, M. K., & Pedersen, K. S. (2002). Action research and practical inquiry: Multicultural-contentintegration in gifted education: Lessons from the field. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26,269-289.Kolloff, P. B. (1996). Gifted girls and the humanities. The Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 486-492.Landrum, M. S. (2002). Resource consultation and collaboration in gifted education. Mansfield Center,CT: Creative Learning Press.Little, C., Feng, A., VanTassel-Baska, J., Rogers, K., & Avery, L. (2007). A study of curriculumeffectiveness in social studies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 272-284.Maker, J. (1986). Developing scope and sequence in curriculum. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(4), 151-158.Nugent, S. A. (2005). Affective education: Addressing the social and emotional needs of gifted students inthe classroom. In F. Karnes & S. Bean (Eds.) Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2 nded., pp. 409-438). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Ogbu, J. U. (1994). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,17, 355-383.Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2002). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your professional and personallife. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.Piechowski, M. M. (1998). The self victorious: Personal strengths, chance, and co-incidence. RoeperReview, 20, 191-198.Pyryt, M. C. (2003). Technology and the gifted. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of GiftedEducation (3 rd ed., pp. 582-589). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Ravaglia, R., Suppes, P., Stillinger, C., & Alper, T.M. (1995). Computer-based mathematics and physicsfor gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 7-13Reis, S., Neu, T., & McGuire, J. (1995). Talents in two places: Case studies of high ability students withlearning disabilities who have achieved (RM 95114). Storrs: University of Connecticut, NationalResearch Center on the Gifted and Talented.Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikowich, J. M., & Purcell, J. H. (1998). Curriculum compacting andachievement test scores: What does the research say? Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 123-129.Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). The schoolwide enrichment model: Developing creative andproductive giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3 rded., pp.184-203). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming gifted education: Matching the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ:Great Potential Press.Rollins, K., Mursky, C., Shah-Coltrane, S., & Johnsen, S. K. (2009). RtI models for gifted students. GiftedChild Today, 32(1), 20-30.Shade, B. J., Kelly, C., & Oberg, M. (1997). Creating culturally responsive classrooms. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.Siegle, D. (2004). Using media and technology with gifted learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. G. (2005). Extending learning through mentorships. In F. Karnes & S. Bean(Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching gifted (2 nd ed., pp. 473-518). Waco, TX: PrufrockPress.Stamps, L. (2004). The effectiveness of curriculum compacting in first grade classrooms. Roeper Review,27, 31-41.National Association for Gifted Children • 1331 H St., NW, Suite 1001 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202.785.4268 • www.nagc.org8

Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Giftedness as developing expertise. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg,& R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 55-66). New York,NY: Elsevier.Stiggins, R. (2008). Assessment manifesto: A call for the development of balanced assessment systems.Portland, OR: ETS Assessment Training Institute.Stiggins, R., Arter, J., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2006). Classroom assessment for student learning:Doing it right–using it well. Portland, OR: ETS Assessment Training Institute.Stormont, M., Stebbins, M. S., & Holliday, G. (2001). Characteristics and educational support needs ofunderrepresented gifted adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 413-423.Tomlinson, C. A. (Ed.). (2004). Differentiation for gifted and talented Students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Tomlinson, C. (2000). Reconcilable differences? Standards-based teaching and differentiation.Educational Leadership, 58(1), 6-11.Tomlinson, C., & Allan, S. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcell, J. H., Leppien, J. H., Burns, D. E., Strickland, C.A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2009). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop learner potential andchallenge advanced learners (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Stead-Dorval, K. B. (2006). Creative problem solving: An introduction(4 th ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Uresti, R., Goertz, J., & Bernal, E. M. (2002). Maximizing achievement for potentially gifted and talentedand regular minority students in a primary classroom. Roeper Review, 25, 27-31.VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). The development of academic talent. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 760-763.,VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners. Denver, CO:Love Publishing.VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004). Curriculum for gifted and talented students. Thousand Oaks, CA: CorwinPress.VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L. D., Little, C., & Hughes, C. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation ofcurriculum innovation: The impact of the William and Mary units on schools. Journal for theEducation of the Gifted, 23, 24-272.VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Ries, R., Poland, D., & Avery, L. (1998). A national study of sciencecurriculum effectiveness with high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 200-211.VanTassel-Baska, J., & Brown, E. F. (2007). An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in giftededucation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 342-358.VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D. T., Hughes, C. E., & Boyce, L. N. (1996). A study of language artscurriculum effectiveness with gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 461-480.VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006a). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3 rd ed.).Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006b). Developing key curriculum products. In J. VanTassel-Baska & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3 rd ed., pp. 17-30).Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006c). Using technology to supplement gifted curriculum. In J.VanTassel-Baska & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3 rd ed.,pp. 290-308). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Van Tassel-Baska, L., Zuo, L., Avery, L. D., & Little, C. A. (2002). Curriculum study of gifted-studentlearning in the language arts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 30-44.Vespi, L., & Yewchuk, C. (1992). A phenomenological study of the social/emotional characteristics ofgifted learning disabled children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 55-72.Weinstein, R. S., Gregory, A., & Strambler, M. J. (2004). Intractable self-fulfilling prophecies: Brown v.Board of Education. American Psychologist, 59, 511-520.Wessel, L. E. (1999). Career counseling for gifted students: Literature review and critique. ERICDocument Reproduction Services No. ED427267.Whitmore, J. A., & Maker, C. J. (1985). Intellectual giftedness in disabled persons. Rockville, MD: Aspen.Winebrenner, S. (2003). Teaching gifted kids in the regular classroom (2 nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: FreeSpirit Press.National Association for Gifted Children • 1331 H St., NW, Suite 1001 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202.785.4268 • www.nagc.org9

Winner, E., & Martino, G. (2003). Artistic giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook ofgifted education (3 rd ed., pp. 335-349). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Zimmerman, E. (1998). Nurturing the arts in programs for gifted and talented students. Phi Delta Kappan,79, 746-751.Standard 4: Learning EnvironmentsBain, S., & Bell, S. (2004). Social self-concept, social-attributions, and peer relationships in fourth, fifthand sixth graders who are gifted compared to high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 167-178.Berger, S. (2003). Technology and gifted learners. In W. A. Owings & L. S. Kaplan (Eds.), Best practices,best thinking, and emerging issues in school leadership (pp. 177-190). Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.Betts, G. (2004). Fostering autonomous learners through levels of differentiation. Roeper Review, 26,190-191.Brody, L. (1999). The talent searches: Counseling and mentoring activities. In N. Colangelo & S.Assouline (Eds.), Talent development III, Proceedings from The 1995 Henry B. and JocelynWallace national research symposium on talent development (pp.153-157). Scottsdale, AZ: GreatPotential Press.Callahan, C. M., Sowa, C. J., May, K. M., Tomchin, E. M., Plucker, J. A., Cunningham, C. M., & Taylor,W. (2004). The social and emotional development of gifted students (RM04118). Storrs:University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.Choi, E. Y. (1998). Through another’s eyes: Student fear number one. Gifted Child Today, 21(4), 30-31,48.Coleman, M. (2001). Surviving or thriving? Gifted middle school boys with learning disabilities. GiftedChild Today, 24, 56-63Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap? Journal for the Education of theGifted, 4, 41-56.Coleman, L. J., & Sanders, M. D. (1993). Understanding the needs of gifted students: Social needs,social choices and masking one’s giftedness. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5, 22-25.Cooper, C. R. (1998). For the good of humankind: Matching the budding talent with a curriculum ofconscience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 238-244.Cross, T. L. (2004). Technology and the unseen world of gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 14-15, 63-65.Cross, T. L., Stewart, R. A., & Coleman, L. (2003). Phenomenology and its implications for gifted studiesresearch: Investigating the lebenswelt of academically gifted students attending an elementarymagnet school. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 201-220.Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success andfailure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Daugherty, M., White, C. S., & Manning, B. H. (1994). Relationships among private speech and creativitymeasurements of young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 21-26.Davalos, R. A., & Haensly, P. A. (1997). After the dust has settled: Youth reflect on their high schoolmentored research experience. Roeper Review, 19, 204-207.den Brok, P., Levy, J., Rodriguez, R., & Wubbels, T. (2002). Perceptions of Asian-American and HispanicAmerican teachers and their students on teacher interpersonal communication style. Teachingand Teacher Education, 18, 447-467.Dweck, C. S. (2007a). Boosting achievement with messages that motivate. Education Canada, 47(2), 6-10Dweck, C. S. (2007b). The perils and promise of praise. Educational Leadership, 65(2), 34-39.Dweck, C. S., & Kamins, M. L. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications forcontingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35, 835-47.Enersen, D. L. (1993). Summer residential programs: Academics and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37,169-176.Feldhusen, J. F., & Kennedy, D. M. (1988). Preparing gifted youth for leadership roles in a rapidlychanging society. Roeper Review, 10, 226-230.National Association for Gifted Children • 1331 H St., NW, Suite 1001 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202.785.4268 • www.nagc.org10

Ford, D. Y., & Trotman, M. F. (2001). Teachers of gifted students: Suggested multicultural characteristicsand competencies. Roeper Review, 23, 235-239.Ford, D., Tyson, C., Howard, T., & Harris, J. J. (2000). Multicultural literature and gifted black students:Promoting self-understanding, awareness, and pride. Roeper Review, 22, 235-240.Frey, C. P. (1998). Struggling with identity: Working with seventh-and eighth-grade gifted girls to airissues of concern. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 437-451.Frey, C. P. (2000). A writer’s workshop for highly verbal students. Gifted Child Today, 23(5), 38-43.Grybe, D. (1997). Mentoring the gifted and talented. Preventing School Failure, 41, 115.Harmon, D. (2002). They won’t teach me: the voices of gifted African American inner-city students.Roeper Review, 24, 68-75.Harper, S. R., & Antonio, A. (2008). Not by accident: Intentionality in diversity, learning and engagement.In Harper, S. R. (Ed.), Creating inclusive campus environments for cross-cultural learning andstudent engagement (pp. 1-18). Washington, D.C.: National Association of Student PersonnelAdministrators.Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World BookHughes, C., Manns, N. N., & Ford, D. Y. (2009). Racial identity attitudes and academic achievementamong at-risk Black female adolescents. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 15(1), 25-32.Hughes, L. (1999). Action research and practical inquiry: How can I meet the needs of the high-abilitystudent within my regular education classroom? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 282-297.Ingram, M. A. (2003). Sociocultural poetry to assist gifted students in developing empathy for the livedexperiences of others. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 83-90.Johnsen, S., & Goree, K. (2005). Teaching gifted students through independent study. In F. Karnes & S.Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted and talented (pp. 379-408). Waco, TX:Prufrock Press.Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and thehonor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26, 20-28.Karnes, F. (1995). Perceptions of leadership held by young females. Journal of Secondary GiftedEducation, 6, 113-119.Kay, S. I. (2008). Nurturing visual arts talent. Gifted Child Today, 31(4), 19-23.Kettler, T., Shiu, A., & Johnsen, S. K. (2006). AP as an Intervention for Middle School Hispanic Students.Gifted Child Today, 29(1), 39-46.Kitano, M. K., & Lewis, R. B. (2005). Resilience and coping: Implications for gifted children and youth atrisk. Roeper Review, 27, 200-205.Kolesinski, M. T., & Leroux, J. A. (1992). The bilingual education experience, French-English, Spanish-English: From a perspective of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 221-224.Kyburg, R. M., Hertberg-Davis, H., & Callahan, C. M. (2007). Advanced Placement and InternationalBaccalaureate programs: Optimal learning environments for talented minorities? Journal ofAdvanced Academics, 18, 172-215.Lee, S.-Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Donahue, R., & Weimbolt, K. (2007). The effects of a service-learningprogram on the development of civic attitudes and behaviors among academically talentedadolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 165-197.Lockwood, A. T. (2007). An agenda for the future: Closing the achievement gap for underrepresentedgroups in gifted and talented education. Storrs: University of Connecticut, National ResearchCenter on the Gifted and Talented.Lovecky, D. (1995). Ramifications of giftedness for girls. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 6,157164.Manor-Bullock, R., Look, C., & Dixon, D. N. (1995). Is giftedness socially stigmatizing? The impact of highachievement on social interactions. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 319-338.McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievementgap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235-261.Merriman, J. (1999). Leadership conference. Gifted Child Today, 22, 18-27.Milem, J., Chang, M., & Antonio, A. (2005). Making diversity work on campus: A research-basedperspective. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.National Association for Gifted Children • 1331 H St., NW, Suite 1001 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202.785.4268 • www.nagc.org11

Myers, M. R., Slavin, M. J., & Southern, W. T. (1990). Emergence and maintenance of leadership amonggifted students in group problem solving. Roeper Review, 12, 256-261.Neihart, M. (2002). Risk and resilience in gifted children: A conceptual framework. In M. Neihart, S. M.Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of giftedchildren: What do we know? (pp. 113-122). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Oakland, T., Falkenberg, B. A., & Oakland, C. (1996). Assessment of leadership in children, youth andadults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 138-146.Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Grant, B., (1994). Social support systems and the disadvantaged gifted: Aframework for developing programs and services. Roeper Review, 17, 20-25.Peterson, J. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006a). Bullying and the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 148-168).Peterson, J. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006b). Bullying among the gifted: The subjective experience. Gifted ChildQuarterly, 50, 252-269.Pleasants, R., Stephens, K. R., Selph, H., & Pfeiffer, S. (2004). Incorporating service learning intoleadership education: Duke TIP's leadership institute. Gifted Child Today, 27(1), 16-21.Pleiss, M. K., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Mentors, role models and heroes in the lives of gifted children.Educational Psychologist, 30, 159-169.Purdie-Vaughns, V., Steele, C. M., Davies, P. G., Crosby, J. R., & Ditlmann, R. (2008). Social identitycontingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstreaminstitutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615-630.Pyryt, M. C. (2003). Technology and the gifted. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of giftededucation (3 rd ed., pp. 582-589). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Ravaglia, R., Suppes, P., Stillinger, C., & Alper, T.M. (1995). Computer-based mathematics and physicsfor gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 7-13.Renzulli, J. (1992) A general theory for the development of creative productivity through the pursuit ofideal acts of learning. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 170-183.Rizza, M. (2006). Computer-assisted technology for the twice exceptional. Understanding Our Gifted,18(4), 11-15.Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. L. (2007). Best practices in gifted education: An evidencebasedguide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Roeper, A. (1992). Global awareness and the young child. Roeper Review, 15, 52-53Ross, J., & Smyth, E. (1995). Differentiating cooperative learning to meet the needs of gifted learners: Acase for transformational leadership. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 63-82.Schroth, S. T., Helfer, J. A., & Dammers, R. (2009). Using technology to assist gifted children's musicaldevelopment. Gifted Child Today. 32(2), 54-61.Schulthes, D. & Wolosky, J. (1998). Developing each child's potential: The Discovery program. GiftedChild Today, 21, 42-45.Siegle, D. (2004). Using media and technology with gifted learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Simonton, D. K. (1999). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Bloomington, IN:Universe.Smyth, E., & Ross, J. (1999). Developing leadership skills of pre-adolescent gifted learners in small groupsettings. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 204-211.Soto, L. D., Smrekar, J. L., & Nekcovei, D. L. (Spring, 1999). Preserving home languages and cultures inthe classroom: Challenges and opportunities. Directions in Language and Education, 13, 1-9.Swiatek, M. A., & Cross, T. L. (2007). Construct validity of the social coping questionnaire. Journal for theEducation of the Gifted, 30, 427-449.Swiatek, M. A., & Dorr, R. (1998). Revision of the social coping questionnaire: Replication and extensionof previous findings. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 252-259.Terry, A. W. (2000). An early glimpse: Service learning from an adolescent perspective. Journal ofSecondary Gifted Education, 11, 115-135.Terry, A. W. (2003). Effects of service learning on young, gifted adolescents and their community. GiftedChild Quarterly, 47, 295-308.Terry, A. W., & Bohnenberger, J. E. (2003). Service learning: Fostering a cycle of caring in our giftedyouth. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 23-32.Thompson, M. C., & Thompson, M. B. (1996). Reflection on foreign language study for highly ablelearners. In J. VanTassel-Baska, D. T. Johnson, & L. N. Boyce (Eds.), Developing verbal talent:National Association for Gifted Children • 1331 H St., NW, Suite 1001 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202.785.4268 • www.nagc.org12

Ideas and strategies for teachers of elementary and middle school students, (pp. 174-188).Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Tookey, M. E. (1999/2000). The International Baccalaureate. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11,52-66.Torrance, E. P. (1984). Mentor relationships: How they aid creative achievement, endure, change anddie. Buffalo, NY: Bearly LimitedTyler-Wood, T., Perez Cereijo, M. V., & Holcomb, T. (2002). Technology skills among gifted students: Isthere a digital divide? Journal for Computing in Teacher Education, 18(2), 57-60.Valdes, G. (2002). Understanding the special giftedness of young interpreters (RM02158). Storrs:University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.Valdes, G. (2003). Expanding definitions of giftedness: The case of young interpreters from immigrantcommunities. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.van Stekelenburg A. V. (1984). Classics for the gifted: Evaluation. ERIC Document Reproduction ServiceNo. ED 292223.VanTassel-Baska, J. (1982). Results of a Latin-based experimental study of the verbally precocious.Roeper Review, 4, 35-37.VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004). Quo Vadis? Laboring in the classical vineyards: An optimal challenge forgifted secondary students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 56-60.VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Using technology to supplement gifted curriculum. In J.VanTassel-Baska & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3rd ed.,pp. 290-308). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Webster, N. S., & Worrell, F. C. (2008). Academically talented students' attitudes toward service in thecommunity, Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 170-179.Williams, E. R., & Baber, C. R. (2007). Building trust through culturally reciprocal home-school-communitycollaboration from the perspective of African-American parents. Multicultural Perspectives, 9(2),3-9.Wolfgang, A. (1991). Intercultural training of teachers and counselors for the year 2000. GiftedInternational, 7(1), 33-36.Zirkel, S. (2008). The influence of multicultural educational practices on student outcomes and intergrouprelations. Teachers College Record, 110, 1147-1181.Standard 5: ProgrammingAblard, K. E., Mills, C. J., & Duvall, R. (1994). Acceleration of CTY math and science students (Tech. Rep. No.10). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Talented Youth.Achter, J. A., Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1997). Rethinking multipotentiality among the intellectuallygifted: A critical review and recommendations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(1), 5-15.Baker, B. D., & Friedman-Nimz, R. (2003). Gifted children, vertical equity, and state school financepolicies and practices. Journal of Education Finance, 28(4), 523-555.Berger, S. (2003). Technology and gifted learners. In W. A. Owings & L. S. Kaplan (Eds.), Best practices,best thinking, and emerging issues in school leadership (pp. 177-190). Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.Betts, G. T., & Neihart, M. (1986). Implementing self-directed learning models for the gifted and talented.Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 174-177.Brody, L. (1999). The talent searches: Counseling and mentoring activities. In N. Colangelo & S.Assouline (Eds.) (1999) Talent development III, Proceedings from The 1995 Henry B. andJocelyn Wallace national research symposium. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.Brody, L. (2004). Grouping and acceleration practices in gifted education. Thousand Oaks, CA: CorwinPress.Callahan, C., & Reis, S. (2004). Program evaluation in gifted education: Essential readings in giftededucation series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Campbell, J. R., & Verna, M. A. (2007). Effective parental influence: Academic home climate linked tochildren's achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 501-519.Colangeo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold backAmerica’s brightest students. Iowa City: University of Iowa, Belin-Blank Center.National Association for Gifted Children • 1331 H St., NW, Suite 1001 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202.785.4268 • www.nagc.org13

Coleman, L. (2006). Talent development in economically disadvantaged populations. Gifted Child Today,29(2), 22-27.Conzemius, A., & O'Neill, J. (2001). Shared responsibility for student learning. Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Davalos, R. A., & Haensly, P. A. (1997). After the dust has settled: Youth reflect on their high schoolmentored research experience. Roeper Review, 19, 204-207.Gentry, M., & Ferriss, S. (1999). StATS: A model of collaboration to develop science talent among ruralstudents. Roeper Review, 21, 316-320.Gentry, M., Rizza, M. G., & Owen, S. V. (2002). Examining perceptions of challenges and choice inclassrooms: The relationship between teachers and their students and comparisons betweengifted students and other students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 145-155.Greene, M. J. (2003). Career adrift? Career counseling for the gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 25,66-72.Hébert, T. P. (1993). Reflections at graduation: The long-term impact of elementary school experiences increative productivity. Roeper Review, 16, 22-28.Hertzog, N. (2003). Advocacy: on the cutting edge. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 66-81.Hughes, C. E., & Rollins, K. (2009). RtI for nurturing giftedness: Implications for the RtI school-basedteam. Gifted Child Today, 32(3), 31-39.Johnsen, S. K., & Johnson, K. (2007). Independent Study Program (2 nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Karnes, M. B., & Johnson, L. J. (1991). The preschool/primary gifted child. Journal for the Education ofthe Gifted, 14, 267-283.Kerr, B., & Kurpius, S. (2004). Encouraging talented girls in math and science: Effects of a guidanceintervention. High Ability Studies. 15, 85-102.Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36,73-77.Landrum, M. S. (2002). Resource consultation and collaboration in gifted education. Mansfield Center,CT: Creative Learning Press.Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (1995). The study of mathematically precocious youth: The first threedecades of a planned 50-year study of intellectual talent. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.),Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 255-289).Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Maxwell, M. (2007). Career counseling is personal counseling: A constructivist approach to nurturing thedevelopment of gifted female adolescents. The Career Development Quarterly, 55, 206-224.Moon, S. M., Feldhusen, J. F., & Dillon, D. R. (1994). Long-term effect of an enrichment program basedon the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 38-48.Moon, S. M., Jurich, J. A., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Families of gifted children: Cradles of development.In R. C. Friedman and K. Rogers (Eds.), Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives ongiftedness (pp. 81-99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Myers, W. A. (1993/1994). Two plus two does not always equal four (years). Journal for Secondary GiftedEducation, 5(2), 27-30.National Association for Gifted Children & The Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted(2009). 2008-2009 State of the states in gifted education: National policy and practice data.Washington, DC: Author.Neber, H., Finsterwald, M., & Urban, N. (2001). Cooperative learning with gifted and high-achievingstudents: A review and meta-analyses of 12 studies. High Ability Studies, 12, 199-214.Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Lee, S-Y. (2004a). Gifted adolescents’ talent development through distancelearning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 7-35Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Lee, S.-Y. (2004b). Parent perceptions of the effects of the Saturday enrichmentprogram on gifted students' talent development. Roeper Review, 26, 156-165.Purcell, J. H., & Leppien, J. H. (1998). Building bridges between general practitioners and educators ofthe gifted: A study of collaboration. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(3), 172-181.Pyryt, M. C. (2003). Technology and the gifted. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of GiftedEducation (3 rd ed., pp. 582-589). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Reis, S. M. & Renzulli, J. S. (2009). The schoolwide enrichment model: A focus on student strengths andinterests. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. McMillen, R. Eckert, & C. Little (Eds.), Systems andNational Association for Gifted Children • 1331 H St., NW, Suite 1001 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202.785.4268 • www.nagc.org14

models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (2 nd ed., pp. 323-352). MansfieldCenter, CT: Creative Learning Press.Renzulli, J. (1992) A general theory for the development of creative productivity through the pursuit ofideal acts of learning. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 170-183.Renzulli, J. (1994). Schools for talent development. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). The schoolwide enrichment model: Developing creative andproductive giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3 rd ed.,pp.184-203). Boston, MA: Allyn & BaconRogers, K. B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talentedlearner: Research-based decision making series. Storrs: University of Connecticut, NationalResearch Center on the Gifted and Talented.Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming gifted education: Matching the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ:Great Potential Press.Scot, T. P., Callahan, C. M., & Urquhart, J. (2008). Paint-by-number teachers and cookie-cutter students:The unintended effects of high-stakes testing on the education of gifted students. Roeper Review,31, 40-52.Shaunessy, E., & Matthews, M. S. (2008). Accounting for gifted education: Making a case for reportingand transparency. Tampa: University of South Florida, David C. Anchin Center.Siegle, D. (2004). Using media and technology with gifted learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. G. (2005). Extending learning through mentorships. In F. Karnes & S. Bean(Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching gifted (2 nd ed., pp. 473-518). Waco, TX: PrufrockPress.Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. PsychologicalReview, 106, 435-457Southern, T. & Jones, E. (Eds.). (1991). The academic acceleration of gifted children. New York, NY:Teachers College Press.Subotnik, R. F., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1997). Restructuring special programs to reflect the distinctionsbetween children’s and adults’ experiences with giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education,72(3&4), 101-116.Swiatek, M. A. (1993). A decade of longitudinal research on academic acceleration through the study ofmathematically precocious youth. Roeper Review, 15, 120-123.Tomlinson, C. A., Coleman, M. R., Allan, S., Udall, A., & Landrum, M. (1996). Interface between giftededucation and general education: Toward communication, cooperation, and collaboration. GiftedChild Quarterly, 40, 165-171.VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004). The acceleration of gifted students’ programs and curriculum. Waco, TX:Prufrock Press.VanTassel-Baska, J., & Brown, E. F. (2007). An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in giftededucation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 342-358.VanTassel-Baska, J., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Kulieke, M. (1994). A study of self-concept and socialsupport in advantaged and disadvantaged seventh and eighth grade gifted students. RoeperReview, 16, 186-191.Wessel, L. E. (1999). Career counseling for gifted students: Literature review and critique. ERICDocument Reproduction Services No. ED427267.Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the effects of full-time vs. part-time educationalprograms for the gifted: Affective outcomes and policy considerations. Evaluation and ProgramPlanning, 22, 413-427.Standard 6: Professional DevelopmentAncess, J. (2001). Teacher learning at the intersection of school learning and student outcomes. In A.Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development thatmatters (pp. 61-78). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Bain, S., Bourgeois, S., & Pappas, D. (2003). Linking theoretical models to actual practices: A survey ofteachers in gifted education. Roeper Review, 25, 166-172.National Association for Gifted Children • 1331 H St., NW, Suite 1001 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202.785.4268 • www.nagc.org15

Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (Eds.). (2004). Designing virtual communities in the service oflearning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Bernal, E. M. (2000). The quintessential features of gifted education as seen from a multiculturalperspective. In G. B. Esquivel & J. C. Houtz (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness in culturally diversestudents (pp. 159-191). Cresskill, NJ: Harrington Press.Boothe, D., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds.). (2004). In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity ingifted education. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Callahan, C., Cooper, C., & Glascock, R. (2003). Preparing teachers to develop and enhance talent: Theposition of national education organizations. (ERIC Document Services No. ED477882).Castellano, J. A., & Diaz, E. I. (2002). Reaching new horizons: Gifted and talented education for culturallyand linguistically diverse students. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Clark, C. M. (Ed.). (2001). Talking shop: Authentic conversations and teacher learning. New York, NY:Teachers College Press.Clarke, D., & Hollingworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching andTeacher Education, 18, 947-967.Copenhaver, J. (2002). Primer for maintaining accurate special education records and meetingconfidentiality requirements when serving children with disabilities--Family Educational Rightsand Privacy Act (FERPA). Logan: Utah State University, Mountain Plains Regional ResourceCenter.Dettmer, P., & Landrum, M. (Eds.). (1998). Staff development: The key to effective gifted educationprogram. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Falk, J. K., & Drayton, B. (Eds.) (2009). Creating and sustaining online professional learning communities.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Ford, D. Y., & Trotman, M. F. (2001). Teachers of gifted students: Suggested multicultural characteristicsand competencies. Roeper Review, 23, 235-239.Frasier, M. M., Hunsaker, S. L., Lee, J., Finley, V. S., Frank, E., & Garcia, J. H. et al. (1995). Educators'perceptions of barriers to the identification of gifted children from economically disadvantagedand limited English proficient backgrounds (RM-95216). Storrs: University of Connecticut,National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professionaldevelopment effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American EducationalResearch Journal, 38, 915-945.Grantham, T. C., & Ford, D. Y. (2003). Beyond self-concept and self esteem: Racial identity and giftedAfrican American students. High School Journal, 87, 18-29.Gubbins, E. J., Westberg, K. L., Reis, S. M., Dinnocenti, S. T., Tieso, C. L., & Muller, L. M., et al. (2002).Implementing a professional development model using gifted education strategies with allstudents (Report RM02172). Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on theGifted and Talented.Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher,15(5), 5-12.Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Han, K. S., & Marvin, C. (2000). A five-year follow-up study of the Nebraska Project: Still a long way togo... Roeper Review, 23, 25-33.Hanninen, G. E. (1988). A study of teacher training in gifted education. Roeper Review, 10, 139-144.Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of giftedstudents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 115-123.Harris, A. (1998). Effective teaching: A review of the literature. School Leadership and Management,18(2), 169-183.Heath, W. J. (1997). What are the most effective characteristics of teachers of the gifted? (ERICDocument Reproduction Services No. ED411665).Higgins, T. E. (2006, April). Pressures to participate: Factors influencing teachers’ involvement in ongoingprofessional development programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AmericanEducational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Howley, C. B., Howley, A., & Pendarvis, E. D. (1995). Out of our minds: Anti-intellectualism and talentdevelopment in American schooling. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Johnsen, S. K., Haensly, P. A., Ryser, G. R., & Ford, R. F. (2002). Changing general education classroomNational Association for Gifted Children • 1331 H St., NW, Suite 1001 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202.785.4268 • www.nagc.org16

practices to adapt for gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 45-63.Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3 rd ed.). Alexandria,VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Kitano, M., Montgomery, D., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen, S. (2008). Using the national giftededucation standards for PreK-12 professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Klein, J. P., & Lugg, E. T. (2002). Nurturing young adolescents legally and ethically. Middle SchoolJournal, 34(1), 13-20.Landrum, M. S., Callahan, C. M., & Shaklee, B. D. (2000). Aiming for excellence: Gifted programstandards. Annotations to the NAGC pre-k-grade 12 gifted program standards. Waco, TX:Prufrock Press.Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D.Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). Washington, DC: AmericanPsychological Association.Masten, W. G., & Plata, M. (2000). Acculturation and teacher ratings of Hispanic and Anglo-Americanstudents. Roeper Review, 23, 45-46.Neihart, M., Reis, S., Robinson, N., & Moon, S. (Eds.). (2002). The social and emotional development ofgifted children: What do we know? Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Plucker, J. A., & Callahan, C. M. (Eds.). (2008). Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What theresearch says. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Vespi, L., & Yewchuk, C. (1992). A phenomenological study of the social/emotional characteristics ofgifted learning disabled children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 55-72.Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: CambridgeUniversity Press.National Association for Gifted Children • 1331 H St., NW, Suite 1001 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202.785.4268 • www.nagc.org17